ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

Remodeling of the endometrial cavity in patients experiencing infertility and pregnancy loss

Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Gus A.I., Omarova A.R.

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Relevance: Uterine abnormalities occur in 35% of infertile patients and in approximately 63% of cases of pregnancy loss. Early detection of congenital uterine abnormalities and timely surgical correction are crucial.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical remodeling of the endometrial cavity in patients with reproductive dysfunction and various types of intrauterine septa.
Materials and methods: Between 2024 and 2025, 325 patients with various types of intrauterine septa underwent surgery at the Department of Operative Gynecology at V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia. All patients underwent pelvic examination using three-dimensional ultrasound scanning. The extent of surgical treatment was determined by the anatomical form of the intrauterine septum and the presence of concomitant gynecological pathologies. Reproductive outcomes were studied in 135 patients over two years following the recovery phase.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 33.6±3.5 years. Based on the anatomical characteristics of the uterus, we classified the intrauterine septa into three categories: complete intrauterine septum (n=22), incomplete intrauterine septum (n=183), and T-shaped narrowing of the uterine cavity (n=120). Hysteroresectoscopy was performed in 245 cases, whereas laparoscopy was combined with hysteroresectoscopy in 80 cases. Three-dimensional surgical remodeling of the endometrial cavity was performed by making a transverse incision in the subendometrial layer of the myometrium using a monopolar hysteroscopic loop at the fundus of the uterine cavity between the openings of the fallopian tubes. Areas of fibrous myometrium at the fundus were excised to a depth of 4–6 mm and a length of 25–30 mm in the transverse direction. Subsequently, a longitudinal excision of the subendometrial layer of the fibrous myometrium was performed along the lateral walls of the uterus from the openings of the fallopian tubes to the internal os, measuring 30–35 mm in length, 4–5 mm deep, and 6–8 mm wide. Pregnancy occurred in 34.8% of patients: 27 achieved pregnancy in a natural cycle, and 20 through IVF and embryo transfer. Thirty-six (26.7%) patients participated in the oocyte donation and pre-pregnancy preparation programs.
Conclusion: Three-dimensional surgical remodeling of the endometrial cavity is recommended for patients with congenital (intrauterine septum) or acquired narrowing (synechiae) of the uterine cavity. It also aims to enhance reproductive outcomes in cases of ineffective embryo transfer attempts during IVF and in older reproductive age groups as part of preimplantation preparation.

Authors' contributions: Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Gus A.I., Omarova A.R. – diagnostics, operations, conception and design of the study, data collection on the stated topic, analysis of the results, drafting and editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding: This study received no funding.
Ethical Approval: The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P (Ref. No: 6 of December 24, 2023).
Patient Consent for Publication: All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Gus A.I., Omarova A.R. Remodeling of
the endometrial cavity in patients experiencing infertility and pregnancy loss.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (11): 95-100 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.217

Keywords

uterine abnormalities
malformations
remodeling
intrauterine septum
T-shaped uterus
miscarriage

References

  1. Fauser B.C.J.M., Adamson G.D., Boivin J., Chambers G.M., de Geyter C., Dyer S. et al. Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2024; 30(2): 153-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad028
  2. Makiyan Z. Systematization for female genital anatomic variations. Clin. Anat. 2021; 34(3): 420-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23668
  3. Noventa M., Spagnol G., Marchetti M., Saccardi C., Bonaldo G., Laganà A.S. et al. Uterine septum with or without hysteroscopic metroplasty: impact on fertility and obstetrical outcomes – a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 11(12): 3290. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123290
  4. Prior M., Richardson A., Asif S., Polanski L., Parris‐Larkin M., Chandler J. et al. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 51(1):110-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.18935
  5. Caballero Campo M., Pérez Milán F., Carrera Roig M., Moratalla Bartolomé E., Domínguez Arroyo J.A., Alcázar Zambrano J.L. et al. Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024; 16(1): 9-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004
  6. Omoto A., Ishikawa H., Inoue M., Morimoto S., Koga K., Shozu M. Metroplasty increases the take-home baby rate by reducing pregnancy loss without changing the chance of conception in women with septate uterus: a retrospective, single-center, observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 860. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06191-3
  7. Joshi B., Kaushal A., Suri V., Gainder S., Choudhary N., Jamwal S. et al. Prevalence and pregnancy outcome of Mullerian anomalies in infertile women: a retrospective study. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2021; 14(4): 431-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_3_21
  8. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment for uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil. Steril. 2024; 122(2): 251-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.033
  9. Al-Husban N., Odeh O., AlRamahi M., Qadri S., Al-Husban H. Fertility-enhancing hysteroscopic surgery; multi-center retrospective cohort study of reproductive outcome. BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1): 459. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02562-2
  10. Kalaitzopoulos D.R., Themeli M.Z., Grigoriadis G., Alterio M.D., Vitale S.G., Angioni S. et al. Fertility, pregnancy and perioperative outcomes after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: a network meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023; 309(3): 731-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07109-2
  11. Rikken J.F.W., Kowalik C.R., Emanuel M.H., Bongers M.Y., Spinder T., Jansen F.W. et al. Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(5): 1260-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab037
  12. Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Асатурова А.В., Ярыгина Н.К. Маточные рудименты: клинико-морфологические варианты и оптимизация хирургического лечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 12: 126-32. [Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Asaturova A.V., Yarygina N.K. Uterine rudiments: clinical and morphological options of surgical treatment and its optimization. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (12): 126-32 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.12.126-132
  13. Burunova V.V., Gisina A.M., Yarygina N.K., Sukhinich K.K., Makiyan Z.N., Yarygin K.N. Isolation of a population of cells co-expressing markers of embryonic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells from the rudimentary uterine horn of a patient with uterine aplasia. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2023; 174(4):549-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10517-023-05746-w

Received 14.08.2025

Accepted 11.11.2025

About the Authors

Zograb N. Makiyan, Dr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Department of Operative Gynecology, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 4, Oparin str., Moscow, 117997, Russia, makiyan@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-1913
Leyla V. Adamyan, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Gynecological Department, Academician V.I. Kulakov
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 4, Oparin str., Moscow,
117997, Russia, adamyanleila@gmai.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3253-4512
Aleksandr I. Gus, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Chief Researcher at the Department of Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 4, Oparin str., Moscow, 117997, Russia, aleksandr_gus@mail.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-3128
Ayna R. Omarova, PhD student at the Department of Operative Gynecology, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 4, Oparin str., Moscow, 117997, Russia, a_omarova@oparina4.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8655-6306
Corresponding author: Zograb N. Makiyan, makiyan@mail.ru

Similar Articles