ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

Vacuum extraction delivery: 11 years of delivery experience, maternal and fetal outcomes

Shramko S.V., Alekseeva M.V., Renge L.V., Vlasenko A.E.

1) Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies – Branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, Novokuznetsk, Russia; 2) Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after G.P. Kurbatov, Perinatal Center, Novokuznetsk, Russia; 3) Digital Technologies and Platforms LLC, Moscow, Russia

The frequency of operative vaginal births using vacuum extraction delivery, also known as fetal vacuum extraction delivery (FVE), varies significantly worldwide and comprises 2.8–16.7% of the total number of births, whereas in Russia it is no more than 1.23%. Improved models of the ventouse systems, along with obvious simplicity and convenience, make the FEV method widely and safely used.
Objective: To assess the outcomes of FVE during vaginal delivery (VD) and cesarean section (CS) for mothers and their newborns.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of the outcome of 387 deliveries by FVE using the KIWI vacuum system was performed on the basis of the births  and newborns histories at the 2nd Maternity Department of the Novokuznetsk Perinatal Center for the period of 2013–2023. Parity, duration of labor, course of the postpartum period in women and the condition of newborns were studied. 
Results: The duration of the FVE was: 5.0 (5.0; 8.0) minutes for VD and 1.0 (1.0; 2.0) minute for CS. In 85% of VD cases and in 96% of CS cases, the postpartum period passed without complications. In 58% of VD cases and in 62% CS cases, the newborns had no complications and there were no cases of severe obstetric trauma. 83% of children were extracted in satisfactory condition, in 2% of CS cases, the death of the newborn occurred. Clinically significant injuries such as subgaleal hematomas and skull fractures were not registered. 
Conclusion: When used in a timely manner, taking into account contraindications, observing the conditions and impeccable technique, FVE can be considered a safe procedure both for the mother and the fetus. 

Authors’ contributions: Shramko S.V., Renge L.V., Alekseeva M.V. – study concept and design; Alekseeva M.V., Shramko S.V. – data collecting  and analysis; Vlasenko A.E. – statistical analysis; Shramko S.V., Alekseeva M.V. – manuscript drafting; Shramko S.V., Renge L.V. – manuscript editing.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to this publication.
Funding: The study was performed without external funding.
Ethical Approval: The study was approved on February 20, 2025 by the Research Ethics Committee of the Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies – Branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, 
Ministry of Health of Russia. 
Patient Consent for Publication: The mothers of newborns provided informed consent for the publication of their data. 
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Shramko S.V., Alekseeva M.V., Renge L.V., Vlasenko A.E. Vacuum extraction delivery: 
11 years of delivery experience, maternal and fetal outcomes.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (8): 80-87 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.75

Keywords

fetal vacuum extraction
operative delivery
vaginal delivery
cesarean section
fetal hypoxia

References

  1. Pattinson R.C., Vannevel V., Barnard D., Baloyi S., Gebhardt G. S., Roux K.L. et al. Failure to perform assisted deliveries is resulting in an in-creased neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality: an expert opinion. S. Afr. Med. J. 2018; 108: 75-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v108i2.12786
  2. Kayiga H., Ajeani J., Kiondo P., Kaye D. Improving the quality of ob-stetric care for women with obstructed labour in the national referral hospital in Uganda: lessons learnt from criteria based audit. BMC Pregnancy Child-birth. 2016; 16(1): 152. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0949-1
  3. Bailit J.L., Grobman W.A., Rice M.M. Wapner R.J., Reddy U.M., Varner M.W. et аl. Evaluation of delivery options for second‐stage events. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 214(638): e1-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.007
  4. Краснопольский В.И., Мельников А.П., Петрухин В.А., Карамян Р.А. Экстраперитонеальное кесарево сечение: место операции в мире и отечественном акушерстве. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; (9): 11-7. [Krasnopolsky V.I., Melnikov A.P., Petrukhin V.A., Karamyan R.A., Extraperitoneal cesarean section: the place of the operation in the world and in Russian obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (9): 11-7 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.9.11-17
  5. Сайдалиева Д.А., Додхоева М.Ф., Абдуллаева Р.А. Эпидемиология и факторы риска развития материнского сепсиса. Вестник Авиценны. 2023; 25(2): 248-59. [Sajdalieva D.A., Dodhoeva M.F., Abdullaeva R.A. Epidemiology and risk factors for the development of maternal sepsis. Avicenna Bulletin. 2023; 25(2): 248-59 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2023-25-2-248-259
  6. Ивачев А.С., Митрошин А.Н., Боярченко Е.М., Ивачева Н.А. Гнойно-воспалительные осложнения и послеоперационные грыжи после кесарева сечения. Ульяновский медико-биологический журнал. 2024; (2): 90-107. [Ivachev A.S., Mitroshin A.N., Boyarchenko E.M., Ivacheva N.A. Pu-rulent-inflammatory complications and postoperative hernias after cesarean section. Ulyanovsk Medical and Biological Journal. 2024; (2): 90-107 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.34014/2227-1848-2024-2-90-107
  7. Кузьменков А.Ю., Виноградова А.Г., Трушин И.В., Эйдельштейн М.В., Авраменко А.А., Козлов Р.С. AMRmap – система мониторинга антибиотикорезистентности в России. Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия. 2021; 23(2): 198-204. [Kuz'menkov A.Yu., Vinogradova A.G., Trushin I.V., Ejdel'shtejn M.V., Avramenko A.A., Kozlov R.S. AMRmap – antibiotic resistance monitoring system in Russia. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2021; 23(2): 198-204 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2021.2.198-204
  8. Федорова М.Н. Тенденции развития человеческого потенциала России: индикаторы состояния здоровья, образования и культуры населения в 2000–2020 гг. Развитие и безопасность. 2022; 3(15): 72-84. [Fedorova M.N. Tendencies of the development of the human potential in Russia: indicators of health status, education and culture of the population in 2000–2020 уеаrs. Development and security. 2022; 3(15): 72-84 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.46960/2713-2633_2022_3_72
  9. Sandall J., Tribe R.M., Avery L. Mola G., Visser G.H., Homer C.S. et. аl. Short term and long term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018; 392: 1349-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
  10. Muraca G.M., Skoll A., Lisonkova S., Sabr Y., Brant R., Cundiff G.W. et al. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2018; 125(6): 693-702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14820
  11. Mola G.D.L., Unger H.W. Strategies to reduce and maintain low perina-tal mortality in resource poor settings – Findings from a four decade observa-tional study of birth records from a large public maternity hospital in Papua New Guinea. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019; 59(3): 394-402. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12876
  12. Muraca G.M., Boutin A., Razaz N., Lisonkova S., John S., Ting J.Y. et аl. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery. CMAJ. 2022; 194(1): E1-E12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210841
  13. Nolens B., Namiiro F., Lule J., Akker T. van den, Roosmalen J. van, Byamugisha J. Prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between vacu-um extraction and second stage cesarean delivery at a Ugandan tertiary referral hospital. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018; 142(1): 28-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12500
  14. Nolens B., van den Akker T., Lule J., Twinomuhangi S., van Roosmalen J., Byamugisha J. Birthing experience and quality of life after vacuum delivery and second stage caesarean section: a prospective cohort study in Uganda. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2018; 23(8): 914-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13089
  15. Ulfsdottir H., Ekéus C., Tedroff K., Åberg K., Pettersson H.J. Long term neurological morbidity among children delivered by vacuum xtraction a national cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2023; 102(7): 843-53. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14568
  16. Ekéus C., Wrangsell K., Penttinen S., Åberg K. Neonatal complications among 596 infants delivered by vacuum extraction (in relation to characteristics of the extraction). J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31(18): 2402-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1344631
  17. Åberg K., Norman M., Pettersson K. Järnbert-Pettersson H., Ekéus C. Protracted vacuum extraction and neonatal intracranial hemorrhage among in-fants born at term: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019; 98(4): 523-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13519
  18. Thierens S., Binsbergen V. A., Nolens B. Akker T., Bloemenkamp K., Rijken M.J. Vacuum extraction or caesarean section in the second stage of labour: a systematic review. BJOG. 2023; 130(6): 586-98. https://dx.doi.org/110.1111/1471-0528.17394
  19. O’Mahony F., Hofmeyr G.J., Menon V. Choice of instruments for as-sisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010; 10(11): CD005455. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858
  20. Kong C.W., To W.W.K. Precision of vacuum cup placement and its association with subgaleal hemorrhage and associated morbidity in term neonates. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024; 309(4): 1411-9. ery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010; 10(11): CD005455. 10.1007/s00404-023-07018-4
  21. Баев О.Р., Гайдарова А.Р., Караваева А.Л. Родовой травматизм новорожденных. Неонатология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2023; 11(2): 67-73. [Baev O.R., Gaydarova A.R., Karavaeva A.L. Birth trauma in newborns. Neonatology: News, Opinions, Training. 2023; 11(2): 67-73 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.33029/2308- 2402-2023-11-2-67-73
  22. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Оперативные влагалищные роды (роды одноплодные, родоразрешение с наложением щипцов или с применением вакуум-экстрактора). М.; 2023. 28 с. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Operative vaginal child-birth (unilateral childbirth, delivery with forceps or vacuum extraction). Moscow; 2023. 28 p. (in Russian)].
  23. Медведева И.Н., Святченко К.С., Барбашова Ю.Ю. Вакуум-экстракция плода: версии и контраверсии. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2017; 66(1): 21-6. [Medvedeva I.N., Svyatchenko K.S., Barbashova Y.Y. Vacuum extraction of the fetus: versions and controversies. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2017; 66(1): 21-6 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17816/JOWD66121-26
  24. Киселева Л.Г., Сачкова Ю.И. Перинатальный анамнез детей при родоразрешении путем вакуум-экстракции. Вятский медицинский вестник. 2024; 2(82): 20-5. [Kiseleva L.G., Sachkova Yu.I. Perinatal history of children delivered by vacuum extraction. Vyatka Medical Bulletin. 2024; 2(82): 20-5 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.24412/2220-7880-2024-2-20-25
  25. Levin G., Tsur A., Rottenstreich A., Cahan T., Shai D., Meyer R. The association of vacuum-assisted delivery and shoulder dystocia among macrosomic newborns: a retrospective study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021; 304(1): 117-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05941-4
  26. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder dystocia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 129(5): e123-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043
  27. Gardella C., Taylor M., Benedetti T., Hitti J., Critchlow C. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001; 185(4): 896-902. https://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.117309
  28. Tsakiridis I., Giouleka S., Mamopoulos A., Athanasiadis A., Daniilidis A., Dagklis T. Operative vaginal delivery: a review of four national guidelines. J. Perinat. Med. 2020; 48(3): 189-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2019-0433

Received 13.03.2025

Accepted 30.06.2025

About the Authors

Svetlana V. Shramko, Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, 654005, Russia, Novokuznetsk, Stroiteley Ave., 5, +7(3843)324-750, shramko_08@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-165X
Marina V. Alekseeva, Head of Obstetric Hospital No. 2, Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1 named after. G.P. Kurbatov, Perinatal Center,
Obstetric Department No. 2, 654031, Russia, Novokuznetsk, Izhevskiy proezd, 16, +7(913)316-99-16, arina13_68@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7553-0856
Ludmila V. Renge, Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia, 654005, Russia, Novokuznetsk, Stroiteley Ave., 5, +7(3843)324-750, l.renge@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7237-9721
Anna E. Vlasenko, Leading Expert, Digital Technologies and Platforms LLC, 115054, Russia, Moscow, Dubininskaya str., 57, build. 1а, vlasenkoanna@inbox.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-4216

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.