Diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the first trimester of pregnancy

Piskulina A.A., Kostyukov K.V.

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Objective: To investigate the incidence and types of fetal congenital anomalies (FCA) detected during first-trimester screening in pregnant women from various risk groups.
Materials and methods:  This retrospective study included 10,044 patients who underwent first-trimester screening at 11–14 weeks of pregnancy at V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P of the Ministry of Health of Russia from 2018 to 2023. Based on baseline medical history and established recommendations, patients were categorized into low- and high-risk groups for fetal pathology. The incidence and types of FCA were analyzed for each group. Pregnancy outcomes including diagnostic verification were assessed using archived electronic patient records. Ultrasound examinations were performed by expert physicians of the Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics Department with appropriate qualifications. Statistical analysis was conducted using the generalized D'Agostino–Pearson test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, with differences considered significant at p<0.05.
Results: Of the study population, 61.6% were in the low-risk group, and 38.3% were in the high-risk group. The mean age of high-risk patients was 37.6 (3.5) years, compared to 29.7 (3.2) years for low-risk patients (p<0.001). Although the median body mass index (BMI) did not differ significantly between the groups, obesity
(BMI>30 kg/m²) was more common in the high-risk group (8.7%) than in the low-risk group (4.8%). Additionally, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) were used more frequently in the high-risk group (19.2%) than in the low-risk group (8.4%; p<0.01). In the low-risk group, most women were primigravidae (64.6%) and primiparae (63.2%), whereas in the high-risk group, 41.5% were primigravidae and 44% were primiparae. The overall incidence of FCA in the cohort was 4.3%, with fetal defects occurring in 1.9% of the low-risk patients and 8.1% of the high-risk patients (p<0.01). Combined fetal defects were the most common, accounting for 55% of all the detected anomalies. The most frequently isolated FCAs were congenital heart, limb anomalies, genitourinary, anterior abdominal wall, and gastrointestinal tract defects. Statistically significant differences in isolated FCA incidences were observed between the groups, specifically for facial, chest, and genitourinary pathologies in low-risk patients (p<0.05). Of the 194 isolated defects, anomalies consistently detected before 14 weeks of pregnancy accounted for 35%, those sometimes detected constituted 58.3%, and those practically not detected made up 6.7%.
Conclusion: Prenatal ultrasound diagnostics enables the detection of a significant proportion of fetal anomalies at 11–14 weeks of gestation. The higher incidence of FCA in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group supports the efficacy of risk-based stratification in prenatal screening.

Authors' contributions: Piskulina A.A. – review of relevant literature, obtaining data for analysis, statistical analysis, drafting of the manuscript; Kostyukov K.V. – conception and design of the study, editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding: There was no funding for this study.
Ethical Approval: The study is a retrospective analysis of data obtained as a result of a standardized screening study in V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia and does not require approval from the ethics committee.
Patient Consent for Publication: All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Piskulina A.A., Kostyukov K.V. Diagnosis of
 fetal congenital anomalies in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (11): 90-97 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.182

Keywords

screening
ultrasound diagnosis
congenital anomalies
prenatal diagnosis

References

  1. Айламазян Э.К., Баранов В.С., ред. Пренатальная диагностика наследственных и врожденных болезней. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2007. 416с. [Ailamazyan E.K., Baranov V.S., eds. Prenatal diagnosis of hereditary and congenital diseases. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2007. 416p. (in Russian)].
  2. AIUM Practice Parameter for the performance of detailed diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations between 12 weeks 0 days and 13 weeks 6 days. J. Ultrasound Med. 2021; 40(5): E1-E16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.15477.
  3. Лазюк Г.И. Этиология и патогенез врожденных пороков развития. Гл. 2. В кн.: Лазюк Г.И., ред. Тератология человека. 2-e изд. М.: Медицина; 1991: 18-46. [Lazyuk G.I. Etiology and pathogenesis of congenital malformations. Ch. 2. In: Lazyuk G.I., ed. Teratology of man. 2nd ed. Moscow: Medicine; 1991: 18-46. (in Russian)].
  4. Медведев М.В., ред. Пренатальная эхография. М.: Реальное Время; 2005. 560с. [Medvedev M.V., ed. Prenatal echography. Moscow: Real Time; 2005. 560p. (in Russian)].
  5. Esteves K.M., Tugarinov N., Lechmann G., Abi Habib P., Cagliyan E., Goetzinger K.R. et al. The value of detailed first-trimester ultrasound in the era of noninvasive prenatal testing. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023; 229(3): 326.e1-326.e6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.031.
  6. Wagner P., Sonek J., Hoopmann M., Abele H., Kagan K.O. First‐trimester screening for trisomies 18 and 13, triploidy and Turner syndrome by detailed early anomaly scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 48(4): 446-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15829.
  7. Abu-Rustum R.S., Daou L., Abu-Rustum S.E. Role of first-trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies. J. Ultrasound. Med. 2010; 29(10): 1445-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2010.29.10.1445.
  8. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Bashiri A., Monteagudo A., Arslan A.A. Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 191(4): 1247-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.007.
  9. Bilardo C.M., Chaoui R., Hyett J.A., Kagan K.O., Karim J.N., Papageorghiou A.T. et al.; International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2023; 61(1): 127-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.26106.
  10. Minnella G.P., Crupano F.M., Syngelaki A., Zidere V., Akolekar R., Nicolaides K.H. Diagnosis of major heart defects by routine first-trimester ultrasound examination: association with increased nuchal translucency, tricuspid regurgitation and abnormal flow in ductus venosus. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 55(5): 637-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21956.
  11. Buijtendijk M.F., Bet B.B., Leeflang M.M., Shah H., Reuvekamp T., Goring T. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2024; 5(5): CD014715. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2.
  12. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации от 20.10.2020 N 1130н «Об утверждении Порядка оказания медицинской помощи по профилю "акушерство и гинекология"». [Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of 20.10.2020 No. 1130n "On approval of the Procedure for the provision of medical care in the field of obstetrics and gynecology". (in Russian)].
  13. Kim S.A., Lee S.M., Hong J.S., Lee J., Park C.W., Kim B.J. et al. Ultrasonographic severity scoring of non-immune hydrops: a predictor of perinatal mortality. J. Perinat. Med. 2015; 43(1): 53-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2013-0208.
  14. Vanaparthy R., Vadakekut E.S., Mahdy H. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL); 2024.
  15. Gjerris A.C., Tabor A., Loft A., Christiansen M., Pinborg A. First trimester prenatal screening among women pregnant after IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012; 18(4): 350-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms010.
  16. Syngelaki A., Hammami A., Bower S., Zidere V., Akolekar R., Nicolaides K.H. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 54(4): 468-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20844.
  17. Karim J.N., Roberts N.W., Salomon L.J., Papageorghiou A.T. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50(4): 429-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17246.
  18. Liao Y., Wen H., Ouyang S., Yuan Y., Bi J., Guan Y. et al. Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 224(4): 396.e1-396.e15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.037.
  19. Kenkhuis M.J.A., Bakker M., Bardi F., Fontanella F., Bakker M.K., Fleurke-Rozema J.H. et al. Effectiveness of 12-13-week scan for early diagnosis of fetal congenital anomalies in the cell-free DNA era. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 51(4): 463-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17487.
  20. Kagan K., Schmid M., Hoopmann M., Wagner P., Abele H. Screening performance and costs of different strategies in prenatal screening for trisomy 21. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015; 75(03): 244-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545885.

Received 31.07.2024

Accepted 14.10.2024

About the Authors

Alexandra A. Piskulina, PhD student, V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, +7(904)888-36-22, piskulinaalexandra@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7845-690X
Kirill V. Kostyukov, Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Department of the Ultrasound and Functional Diagnosis, V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia, +7(926)214-97-84, kostyukov_k@yahoo.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3094-4013

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.