Correlation of perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia with the dynamics of CD16+ monocyte content in peripheral blood

Tyutyunnik V.L., Mirzabekova D.D., Mikhailova O.I., Kan N.E., Krasnyi A.M.

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Objective: To study the changes of CD16+ monocytes, the expression of CD86, CD152 in monocytes and CD28 in lymphocytes in the peripheral blood of pregnant women with preeclampsia in the course of therapy; to identify factors of prognostic value for determining the group of patients with complications in the neonatal period.
Materials and methods: The study included 26 patients with preeclampsia of various degrees of severity and time of manifestation. The expression of CD86 and CD152 in monocytes, CD28 in lymphocytes, and CD16+ in monocytes was determined using flow cytometry after diagnosis verification and before delivery. Two study groups were formed retrospectively: group 1 (main, n=10) included patients with a complicated course of the early neonatal period and group 2 (comparison group, n=16) included patients with an uncomplicated course of the early neonatal period. The change in the markers in response to therapy in both study groups was examined.
Results: There was a higher level of increase in the studied markers in the group of patients with a complicated course of the early neonatal period. There was a statistically significant increase in the CD16+ monocyte content in the group of patients with a complicated course (p<0.001). The median change in the content of CD16+ monocytes over five days was 13%. It was 0.95% in the group of patients with an uncomplicated course of the early neonatal period. The ROC analysis showed that the time change in the content of CD16+ in monocytes has a prognostic value for determining perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia, AUC=0.96.
Conclusion: The findings suggest the prospective prognostic value of determining the level of CD16+ monocytes in the peripheral blood of pregnant women in dynamics in order to predict perinatal outcomes. This can help optimize the planned delivery time.

Authors’ contributions: Tyutyunnik V.L., Mikhailova O.I., Kan N.E., Mirzabekova D.D., Krasnyi A.M. – developing the concept and design of the study, obtaining data for analysis, review of publications on the topic of the article, processing and analysis of the material, writing the text, editing the article.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no possible conflicts of interest.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship.
Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Patient Consent for Publication: The patients provided an informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Tyutyunnik V.L., Mirzabekova D.D., Mikhailova O.I., Kan N.E., Krasnyi A.M. Correlation of perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia with the dynamics of CD16+ monocyte content in peripheral blood.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (9): 73-80 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.168

Keywords

pregnancy
preeclampsia
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
CD152
CD86
CD28
CD16
monocytes
lymphocytes

References

  1. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Преэклампсия. Эклампсия. Отеки, протеинурия и гипертензивные расстройства во время беременности, в родах и послеродовом периоде. М.; 2021. 81 с. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Preeclampsia. Eclampsia. Clinical guidelines. Edema, proteinuria and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Moscow; 2021. 81 p. (in Russian)].
  2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 133(1): 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018.
  3. Jung E., Romero R., Yeo L., Gomez-Lopez N., Chaemsaithong P., Jaovisidha A. et al. The etiology of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226 (2S): S844-S866. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1356.
  4. Turbeville H.R., Sasser J.M. Preeclampsia beyond pregnancy: long-term consequences for mother and child. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2020; 318(6): F1315-F1326. https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00071.2020.
  5. Roberts J.M., Rich-Edwards J.W., McElrath T.F., Garmire L., Myatt L.; Global Pregnancy Collaboration. Subtypes of preeclampsia: recognition and determining clinical usefulness. Hypertension. 2021; 77(5): 1430-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14781.
  6. Melchiorre K., Giorgione V., Thilaganathan B. The placenta and preeclampsia: villain or victim? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226 (2S): S954-S962. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.024.
  7. Duhig K.E., Myers J., Seed P.T., Sparkes J., Lowe J., Hunter R.M. et al.; PARROT trial group. Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 393(10183): 1807-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33212-4.
  8. Пылаева Н.Ю., Шифман Е.М., Пономарева Е.Г., Османова Э.С. Антитромбин III – эволюция от антикоагулянта к маркеру тяжелых форм преэклампсии. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2020; (6): 57‑61. [Pylaeva N.Yu., Shifman E.M., Ponomareva E.G., Osmanova E.S. Antithrombin III – evolution from anticoagulant to a marker of severe preeclampsia. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2020; (6): 57‑61. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202006157.
  9. Sachan R., Patel M.L., Dhiman S., Gupta P., Sachan P., Shyam R. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of serum soluble endoglin levels in preeclampsia and eclampsia. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2016; 5: 119. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.186993.
  10. Karapetian А.О., Baev О.R., Sadekova А.А., Krasnyi А.М., Sukhikh G.T. Cell-free foetal DNA as a useful marker for preeclampsia prediction. Reprod. Sci. 2021; 28(5): 1563-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00466-w.
  11. Krasnyi A.M., Gracheva M.I., Sadekova A.A., Vtorushina V.V., Balashov I.S., Kan N.E. et al. Combined study of total, fetal DNA, cytokines in maternal blood plasma in preeclampsia Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018; 164(6): 721-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10517-018-4066-1.
  12. Борис Д.А., Волгина Н.Е., Красный А.М., Тютюнник В.Л., Кан Н.Е. Прогнозирование преэклампсии по содержанию CD16-негативных моноцитов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 7: 49-55. [Boris D.A., Volgina N.E., Krasnyi A.M., Tyutyunnik V.L., Kan N.E. Prediction of preeclampsia on the couts of CD-16 negative monocytes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (7): 49-55. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.7.49-55.
  13. MacDonald T.M., Walker S.P., Hannan N.J., Tong S., Kaitu'u-Lino T.J. Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia. EBioMedicine. 2022; 75: 103780. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103780.
  14. Staff A.C., Fjeldstad H.E., Fosheim I.K., Moe K., Turowski G., Johnsen G.M. et al. Failure of physiological transformation and spiral artery atherosis: their roles in preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226(2S): S895-S906. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.026.
  15. Chang K.J., Seow K.M., Chen K.H. Preeclampsia: Recent advances in predicting, preventing, and managing the maternal and fetal life-threatening condition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023; 20(4): 2994. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042994.
  16. Садекова А.А., Хачатрян З.В., Красный А.М., Кан Н.Е., Хачатурян А.А., Тютюнник В.Л. Диагностическая значимость определения уровня внеклеточной фетальной ДНК у беременных с преэклампсией и задержкой роста плода. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 8: 144-9. [Sadekova A.A., Khachatryan Z.V., Krasnyi A.M., Kan N.E., Khachaturian A.A., Tyutyunnik V.L. The diagnostic significance of determining the level of extracellular fetal DNA in pregnant women with preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (8): 144-9. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.8.144-149.
  17. Uzunov A.V., Secara D.C., Mehedințu C., Cîrstoiu M.M. Preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes in adolescent and adult patients. J. Med. Life. 2022; 15(12): 1488-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0264.
  18. Overton E., Tobes D., Lee A. Preeclampsia diagnosis and management. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2022; 36(1): 107-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2022.02.003.
  19. Wang Y., Li B., Zhao Y. Inflammation in preeclampsia: genetic biomarkers, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies. Front. Immunol. 2022; 13: 883404. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.883404.
  20. Nirupama R., Divyashree S., Janhavi P., Muthukumar S.P., Ravindra P.V. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology and management. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 50(2): 101975. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101975.
  21. Красный А.М., Кан Н.Е., Мирзабекова Д.Д., Тютюнник В.Л., Панасенко Е.А., Садекова А.А. Фенотипический профиль мононуклеарных клеток периферической крови при преэклампсии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 5: 68-74. [Krasnyi A.M., Kan N.E., Mirzabekova D.D., Tyutyunnik V.L., Panasenko E.A., Sadekova A.A. Phenotypic profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in preeclampsia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (5): 68-74 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/0.18565/aig.2023.27.

Received 17.07.2024

Accepted 24.09.2024

About the Authors

Victor L. Tyutyunnik, Professor, Dr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher of Center of Scientific and Clinical Researches, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, tioutiounnik@mail.ru, Researcher ID: B-2364-2015, SPIN-code: 1963-1359, Authors ID: 213217, Scopus Author ID: 56190621500, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-5099
Dzhamilia D. Mirzabekova, graduate student, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, Jamilya1705@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-3334
Natalia E. Kan, Professor, Dr. Med. Sci., Deputy Director of Science, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, kan-med@mail.ru, Researcher ID: B-2370-2015, SPIN-code: 5378-8437,
Authors ID: 624900, Scopus Author ID: 57008835600, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-5946
Olga I. Mikhailova, PhD, Researcher at 2nd Maternity Department, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, omikhaylova@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-8704
Aleksey M. Krasnyi, PhD, Head of the Cytology Laboratory, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, alexred@list.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7883-2702

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.