Placenta accreta: a modern view on etiopathogenesis and obstetric tactics

Ignatko I.V., Bogomazova I.M., Timokhina E.V., Belousova V.S., Fedyunina I.A., Kardanova M.A., Samara A.B., Gutsu V.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Placenta accreta spectrum refers to a form of abnormal placentation and its severity depends on the depth of trophoblast invasion. This abnormality leads to a partial or complete delay in the separation of the placenta in the third stage of labor. The incidence of placental attachment disorders has increased by more than 9 times over the past 20 years. The etiological factors of the abnormality include placenta previa, the presence of postoperative uterine scar, the history of intrauterine interventions, pelvic inflammatory diseases, etc. Placenta previa and uterine scar after cesarean section (CS) are the most common causes of placenta accreta; moreover, the risk of placenta accreta after one CS increases by 7 times, and it increases by 56 times after two or more CS. 
Currently, the main theory on the pathogenesis of placenta accreta consists in an impaired decidualization of the endometrium, which leads to uncontrolled invasion of the trophoblast. It is the decidua basalis that regulates proper invasion of the trophoblast by producing pro- and anti-invasive factors. This review presents the evolution of placenta accreta classifications. The main methods of antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta are ultrasound assessment and magnetic resonance imaging, but none of them has 100% sensitivity and specificity; therefore, laboratory studies are currently conducted to search for biomarkers associated with the depth of trophoblast invasion.
Conclusion: The tactics of managing patients with placenta accreta depends on the depth of invasion, the amount of blood loss and the experience of surgeons, as well as the woman’s desire to preserve her fertility. There are conservative or organ-preserving methods of surgical treatment and non-conservative ones which include hysterectomy. The conservative methods include leaving the placenta in situ, one-stage surgical management, and the Triple-P procedure. The traditional technique involving CS followed by hysterectomy is characterized by a high maternal morbidity due to the development of intra- and postoperative complications.

Authors’ contributions: Ignatko I.V., Bogomazova I.M. – developing the concept and design of the study; Samara A.B., 
Fedyunina I.A. – collecting and processing the material; Gutsu V., Kardanova M.A. – statistical data processing; Samara A.B., Bogomazova I.M. – writing the text; Ignatko I.V., Timokhina E.V., Belousova V.S. – editing the article.
Conflicts of interest: Authors declare lack of the possible conflicts of interests.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship.
For citation: Ignatko I.V., Bogomazova I.M., Timokhina E.V., Belousova V.S., Fedyunina I.A., 
Kardanova M.A., Samara A.B., Gutsu V. Placenta accreta: a modern view on etiopathogenesis and obstetric tactics.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (1): 5-11 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.251

Keywords

placenta accreta
placenta increta
placenta percreta
PAS
etiology of placenta accreta
classification of placenta accreta
diagnosis of placenta accreta
conservative treatment of placenta accreta

References

  1. Hecht J.L., Baergen R., Ernst L.M., Katzman P.J., Jacques S.M., Jauniaux E. et al. Classification and reporting guidelines for the pathology diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: recommendations from an expert panel. Mod. Pathol. 2020;33(12):2382-96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0569-1.
  2. Arakaza A., Zou L., Zhu J. Placenta accrete spectrum diagnosis challenges and controversies in current obstetrics: a review. Int. J. Womens Health. 2023;15:635-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S395271.
  3. Jauniaux E., Bhide A., Kennedy A., Woodward P., Hubinont C., Collins S.; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018;140(3):274-80.https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12408.
  4. Berkley E.M., Abuhamad A. Imaging of placenta accreta spectrum. Clin. Obst. Gynecol. 2018;61(4):755-65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000407.
  5. Jauniaux E., Chantraine F., Silver R.M., Langhoff-Roos J.; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018;140(3):265-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12407.
  6. Забелина Т.М., Васильченко О.Н., Каримова Г.Н., Ежова Л.С., Учеваткина П.В., Шмаков Р.Г. Родоразрешение беременных с врастанием плаценты без рубца на матке. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021;4:150-6. [Zabelina T.M., Vasilchenko O.N., Karimova G.N., Ezhova L.S., Uchevatkina P.V., Shmakov R.G. Delivery of pregnant women with placenta increta and no uterine scar. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;(4):150-6. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.4.150-156.
  7. Организация объединенных наций. Новости ООН, 16 июня 2021. ВОЗ: все больше женщин рожают с помощью кесарева сечения при отсутствии медицинских показаний. Доступно по: http://news.un.org/ru/story/2021/06/1404792. [United Nations. UN News, 2021, June 16. WHO: more and more women are giving birth by caesarean section in the absence of medical indications. Available at: http://news.un.org/ru/story/2021/06/1404792.(in Russian)].
  8. Betran A.P., Ye J., Moller A.B., Souza J.P., Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob. Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
  9. The Lancet. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1279. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32394-8.
  10. Thurn L., Lindqvist P.G., Jakobsson M., Colmorn L.B., Klungsoyr K., Bjarnadóttir R.I. et al. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016;123(8):1348-55.https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13547.
  11. Marshall N.E., Fu R., Guise J.M. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262.e1-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035.
  12. Jauniaux E., Collins S., Burton G.J. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218(1):75-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067.
  13. Morlando M., Collins S. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders: challenges, risks, and management strategies. Int. J. Womens Health. 2020;12:1033-45.https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S224191.
  14. Badr D.A., Al Hassan J., Wehbe G.S., Ramadan M.K. Uterine body placenta accreta spectrum: A detailed literature review. Placenta. 2020;95:44-52.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2020.04.005.
  15. Sharma S., Godbole G., Modi D. Decidual control of trophoblast invasion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016;75(3):341-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aji.12466
  16. Zhang X., Wei H. Role of decidual natural killer cells in human pregnancy and related pregnancy complications. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:728291.https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.728291.
  17. Laban M., Ibrahim E.A., Elsafty M.S., Hassanin A.S. Placenta accreta is associated with decreased decidual natural killer (dNK) cells population: a comparative pilot study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014;181:284-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.015.
  18. Carlino C., Rippo M.R., Lazzarini R., Monsurrò V., Morrone S., Angelini S. et al. Differential microRNA expression between decidual and peripheral blood natural killer cells in early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2018;33(12):2184-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey323
  19. Jansen C.H.J.R., Kastelein A.W., Kleinrouweler C.E., van Leeuwen E., De Jong K.H., Pajkrt E., van Noorden C.J.F. Development of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020;99(8):983-93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13834
  20. Qian Z.-D, Weng Y., Wang C.-F., Huang L.-L., Zhu X.-M. Research on the expression of integrin β3 and leukaemia inhibitory factor in the decidua of women with cesarean scar pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1270-3.
  21. Torabi S., Sheikh M., Masrour F.F., Shamshirsaz A.A., Bateni Z.H., Nassr A.A. et al. Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in second pregnancy with previous elective cesarean section. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(13):2221-7.https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1430132.
  22. Flo K., Widnes C., Vårtun Å., Acharya G. Blood flow to the scarred gravid uterus at 22–24 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2014;121(2):210-5.https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12441.
  23. Shigemitsu A., Naruse K., Kobayashi H. Hypoxia promotes extravillous trophoblast cell invasion through the hypoxia-inducible factor urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor pathway. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.2022;87(3-4):232-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525851.
  24. Zhao H., Wong R.J., Stevenson D.K. The impact of hypoxia in early pregnancy on placental cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(18):9675. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189675.
  25. Jauniaux E., Ayres-de-Campos D., Langhoff-Roos J., Fox K.A., Collins S.; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019;146(1):20-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12761.
  26. Palacios-Jaraquemada J.M., D'Antonio F., Buca D., Fiorillo A., Larraza P. Systematic review on near miss cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: correlation with invasion topography, prenatal imaging, and surgical outcome. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(19):3377-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1570494.
  27. Maged A.M., El-Mazny A., Kamal N., Mahmoud S.I., Fouad M., El-Nassery N. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):354. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6.
  28. De Oliveira Carniello M., Oliveira Brito L.G., Sarian L.O., Bennini J.R. Diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in high-risk women using ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;59(4):428-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24861.
  29. D'Antonio F., Iacovella C., Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;42(5):509-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.13194.
  30. Bailit J.L., Grobman W.A., Rice M.M., Reddy U.M., Wapner R.J., Varner M.W. et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Morbidly adherent placenta treatments and outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;125(3):683-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000680.
  31. Tinari S., Buca D., Cali G., Timor-Tritsch I., Palacios-Jaraquemada J., Rizzo G. et al. Risk factors, histopathology and diagnostic accuracy in posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;57(6):903-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.22183
  32. Morel O., Collins S.L., Uzan-Augui J., Masselli G., Duan J., Chabot-Lecoanet A.C. et al.; International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta (IS-AIP). A proposal for standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) – from the International Society for AIP. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2019;100(6):319-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.004.
  33. Familiari A., Liberati M., Lim P., Pagani G., Cali G., Buca D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the severity of abnormal invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2018;97(5):507-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13258.
  34. Einerson B.D., Rodriguez C.E., Kennedy A.M., Woodward P.J., Donnelly M.A., Silver R.M. Magnetic resonance imaging is often misleading when used as an adjunct to ultrasound in the management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;218(6):618.e1-618.e7.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.013.
  35. Zhang T., Wang S. Potential serum biomarkers in prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2022;9:860186.https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.860186.
  36. Виницкий А.А., Шмаков Р.Г. Современные представления об этиопатогенезе врастания плаценты и перспективы его прогнозирования молекулярными методами диагностики. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017;2: 5-10. [Vinitskiy A.A., Shmakov R.G. The modern concepts of etiology and pathogenesis placenta accreta and prospects of its prediction by molecular diagnostics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;(2):5-10. (in Russian)].https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.2.5-10.
  37. Rac M.W.F., Dashe J.S., Wells C.E., Moschos E., McIntire D.D., Twickler D.M. Ultrasound predictors of placental invasion: the placenta accreta index. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;212(3):343.e1-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.022.
  38. Jauniaux E., Hussein A.M., Fox K.A., Collins S.L. New evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019;61:75-88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.04.006.
  39. Sentilhes L., Kayem G., Chandraharan E., Palacios-Jaraquemada J., Jauniaux E.; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Conservative management. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018;140(3):291-8.https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12410.
  40. Sentilhes L., Kayem G., Silver R.M. Conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018;61(4):783-94.https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000395.
  41. de Marcillac F.D., Lecointre L., Guillaume A., Sananes N., Fritz G., Viville B. et al. Morbimortalité maternelle associée au traitement conservateur d’un placenta anormalement adhérent (accreta) diagnostiqué en anténatal. À propos d’une série continue de 15 cas [Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with conservative management for placenta morbidly adherent (accreta) diagnosed during pregnancy. Report of 15 cases]. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2016;45(8):849-58. French. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.012.
  42. Курцер М.А., Бреслав И.Ю., Латышкевич О.А., Григорьян А.М. Временная баллонная окклюзия общих подвздошных артерий у пациенток с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения и placenta accreta. Преимущества и возможные осложнения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016;12: 70-5. [Kurtser M.A., Breslav I.Yu., Latyshkevich O.A., Grigoryan A.M. Temporary balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries in patients with post-cesarean uterine scar and placenta accreta: Advantages and possible complications. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;(12):70-5. (in Russian)].https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2016.12.70-5.
  43. Allen L., Jauniaux E., Hobson S., Papillon-Smith J., Belfort M.A.; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Nonconservative surgical management. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018;140(3):281-90.https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12409.
  44. Piñas Carrillo A., Chandraharan E. Placenta accreta spectrum: Risk factors, diagnosis and management with special reference to the Triple P procedure. Womens Health (Lond). 2019;15:1745506519878081.https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745506519878081.

Received 07.11.2023

Accepted 14.12.2023

About the Authors

Irina V. Ignatko, Dr. Med. Sci., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, ignatko_i_v@staff.sechenov.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-3848
Irina M. Bogomazova, PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, +7(926)305-04-03, bogomazova_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-7726
Elena V. Timokhina, Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),
119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, timokhina_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-0023
Vera S. Belousova, Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University),
119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, belousova_v_s@staff.sechenov.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8332-7073
Irina A. Fedyunina, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine,
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, fedyunina_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru , https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-5338
Madina A. Kardanova, PhD, Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2,
kardanova_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-0717
Alina B. Samara, student of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, linaasamaraa@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8266-6524
Vladimir Gutsu, Resident of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str., 8-2, gutsu_vladimir@mail.ru,
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3712-3280
Corresponding author: Irina M. Bogomazova, bogomazova_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.