Respectful midwifery care
Mazúchová L., Porubská A., Kelčíková S., Maskalová E., Malinovská N.
Introduction: Obstetric care that respects a woman’s autonomy during childbirth is a basic component of quality care that every woman needs and deserves during childbirth.
Objective: To determine the degree of respect for a woman’s autonomy during childbirth and providing respectful care as well as their interrelationship.
Materials and methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study design was chosen. The study sample included 453 women (mean age is 29.8 (4.6) years) after spontaneous vaginal delivery from 0 to 1 year. The tool for data collection was the MADM questionnaire supplemented with self-constructed questions. Descriptive and inductive statistics (Student’s t-test) were used for analysis.
Results: The mean MADM scale score was 24.9 (10.33) which represents the borderline between the low and adequate degrees of parturient woman’s autonomy. In the assessment of respectful care, the lowest scores were obtained for questions related to the possibility of choosing a position, the woman’s feeling that she could refuse any routine procedure or examination, and the possibility of moving freely in the delivery room. A statistically significant association was demonstrated between the degree of women’s autonomy during childbirth and all variables of respectful care.
Conclusion: Health care providers should make every effort to actively support a woman’s autonomy during childbirth in all available ways to ensure that respectful care becomes the norm.
Authors’ contributions: Mazúchová L., Porubská A. – developing the concept and design of the study, collecting and processing the material; Porubská A., Mazúchová L. – statistical processing of the data; Mazúchová L., Malinovská N., Kelčíková S., Maskálová E. – writing the text; Malinovská N. – editing the article.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Financing: There was no funding obtained for the study.
Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board “Ethics of the Žilina and Trnava self-governing regions”.
Patient Consent Publication: The patients provided an informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Mazúchová L., Porubská A., Kelčíková S., Maskalová E., Malinovská N. Respectful midwifery care.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (11): 110-117 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.213
Keywords
References
- Attanasio L.B., Kozhimannil K.B., Kjerulff K.H. Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth. Patient Educ. Couns. 2018; 101(6): 1130-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.002.
- Feijen-de Jong E.I., van der Pijl M., Vedam S., Jansen D.E.M.C., Peters L.L. Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures. Women Birth. 2020; 33(5): e447-e454. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.008.
- Wilhelmová R., Veselá L., Korábová, I., Slezáková S., Pokorná A. Determinants of respectful care in midwifery. Kontak. 2022; 24(4): 302-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.32725/kont.2022.035.
- Prosen M., Krajnc M.T. Sociological conceptualization of the medicalization of pregnancy and childbirth: the implications in Slovenia. Revija Za Sociologiju. 2013; 43(3): 251-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.5613/rzs.43.3.3.
- WHO. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO Document Production Services. 2018; 200 p.
- Bohren M.A., Tunçalp Ö., Miller S. Transforming intrapartum care: Respectful maternity care. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020; 67: 113-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.005.
- Vedam S., Stoll K., Martin K., Rubashkin N., Partridge S., Thordarson D. et al.; Changing Childbirth in BC Steering Council. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0171804. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171804.
- Vedam S., Stoll K., McRae D.N., Korchinski M., Velasquez R., Wang J. et al.; CCinBC Steering Committee. Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care. Patient Educ. Couns. 2019; 102(3): 586-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023.
- Iravani M., Zarean E., Janghorbani M., Bahrami M. Women's needs and expectations during normal labor and delivery. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2015; 4: 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.151885.
- Reed R., Sharman R., Inglis C. Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1): 21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1197-0.
- Bohren M.A., Hofmeyr G.J., Sakala C., Fukuzawa R.K., Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017; 7(7): CD003766. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6.
- Mazúchová L., Kelčíková S., Štofaníková L., Kopincová J., Malinovská N., Grendár M. Satisfaction of Slovak women with psychosocial aspects of care during childbirth. Midwifery. 2020; 86: 102711. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102711.
- Mazúchová L., Kelčíková S., Štofániková L., Malinovská N. Women´s control and participation in decision-making during childbirth in relation to satisfaction. Cen. Eur. J. Nurs. Midw. 2020; 11(3): 136-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0021.
- Afulani P.A., Buback L., Kelly A.M., Kirumbi L., Cohen C.R., Lyndon A. Providers' perceptions of communication and women's autonomy during childbirth: a mixed methods study in Kenya. Reprod. Health. 2020; 17(1): 85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0909-0.
- Reis T.L.D.R.D., Padoin S.M.M., Toebe T.R.P., Paula C.C., Quadros J.S. Women's autonomy in the process of labour and childbirth: integrative literature review. Rev. Gaucha Enferm. 2017; 38(1): e64677. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.01.64677.
- Hodnett E.D., Gates S., Hofmeyr G.J., Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; 7: CD003766. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub5.
- Meyer S. Control in childbirth: a concept analysis and synthesis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2013; 69(1): 218-28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06051.x.
- Olza I., Uvnas-Moberg K., Ekström-Bergström A., Leahy-Warren P., Karlsdottir S.I., Nieuwenhuijze M. et al. Birth as a neuro-psycho-social event: An integrative model of maternal experiences and their relation to neurohormonal events during childbirth. PLoS One. 2020; 15(7): e0230992. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230992.
- Sandall J., Soltani H., Gates S., Shennan A., Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; 4(4): CD004667. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
- Nieuwenhuijze M.J., de Jonge A., Korstjens I., Budé L., Lagro-Janssen T.L. Influence on birthing positions affects women's sense of control in second stage of labour. Midwifery. 2013; 29(11): e107-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.007.
- Mensah R.S., Mogale R.S., Richter M.S. Birthing experiences of Ghanaian women in 37th Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Int. J. Africa Nurs Sci. 2014; 1: 29-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2014.06.001.
- Nigatu D., Gebremariam A., Abera M., Setegn T., Deribe K. Factors associated with women's autonomy regarding maternal and child health care utilization in Bale Zone: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14: 79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-79.
- Yuill C., McCourt C., Cheyne H., Leister N. Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20: 343. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6.
- Novysedláková M., Kaiserová E. Psychosociálne aspekty chronického ochorenia. Zdravotnícke štúdie. 2015; 8(2): 36-8.
Received 26.08.2024
Accepted 28.10.2024
About the Authors
Lucia Mazúchová, MSN, PhD, a lecturer with the specialization on Nursing and Midwifery at Comenius University (Bratislava), Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Department of Midwifery, Malá Hora 5, Martin 036 01, Slovakia, lucia.mazuchova@uniba.sk, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-0922Andrea Porubská, MSN, a midwife at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in the A. Winter Hospital, Piešt’any, Slovakia, andrea.porubska2@gmail.com
Simona Kelčíková, MSN, PhD, a lecturer with the specialization on Public Health, Nursing, and Midwifery at Comenius University (Bratislava), Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Department of Midwifery, Malá Hora 5, Martin 036 01, Slovakia, simona.kelcikova@uniba.sk, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-4343
Erika Maskalová, MSN, PhD, a lecturer with the specialization on Nursing and Midwifery at Comenius University (Bratislava), Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Department of Midwifery, Malá Hora 5, Martin 036 01, Slovakia, erika.maskalova@uniba.sk, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2806-4586
Nora Malinovská, MA, PhD, a lecturer in Medical Latin and English for Medical Purposes, History of Medicine at Comenius University (Bratislava), Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Department of Foreign Languages, Malá Hora 5, Martin 036 01, Slovakia, 00421 432633520, nora.malinovska@uniba.sk, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-207X
Corresponding author: Nora Malinovská, nora.malinovska@uniba.sk