Severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome at 18 weeks gestation

Belokrinitskaya T.E., Frolova N.I., Kargina D.S., Zolotukhina А.О., Agarkova М.А.

1) Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Chita, Russia; 2) Transbaikal Regional Hospital, Chita, Russia; 3) Transbaikal Regional Pathoanatomical Bureau, Chita, Russia

Background: According to the current Russian and international clinical guidelines, preeclampsia is a complication of pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum period characterized by an increase in systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg after 20 weeks gestation, regardless of the BP level in the patient’s history, combined with proteinuria or at least another parameter indicating the onset of multi-organ failure. However, preeclampsia is generally known to occur before 20 weeks gestation in patients with molar pregnancy.  
Case report: The article presents a clinical observation of a case of severe preeclampsia complicated by HELLP syndrome at 18 weeks gestation in a healthy patient at high risk of developing preeclampsia who did not receive acetylsalicylic acid prophylaxis. The clinical case has a favorable outcome for the mother but it resulted in the fetal loss.
Conclusion: It is recommended to determine biochemical markers (PlGF or PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio) in order to improve the efficiency of prenatal screening and to identify the risk group for the development of preeclampsia before 20 weeks gestation. The effects of acetylsalicylic acid on the prevention of preeclampsia before 20 weeks gestation have not been studied yet due to the rare incidence of atypical course of this complication. It is necessary to conduct international registry studies to establish new criteria for the prognosis of early-onset preeclampsia and to reconsider the current definition.

Authors’ contributions: Belokrinitskaya T.E. – developing the concept and design of the study, general supervision, editing the text; Frolova N.I. – collection and analysis of publications on the issue of the article; Kargina D.S., Agarkova M.A. – collecting and processing clinical material; Zolotukhina A.O. – pathomorphological studies, preparation of slides of placenta, their description; Belokrinitskaya T.E., Frolova N.I. – writing the text.
Conflicts of interest: Authors declare lack of the possible conflicts of interests.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship.
Patient Consent for Publication: The patient provided an informed consent for the publication of her data.
For citation: Belokrinitskaya T.E., Frolova N.I., Kargina D.S., Zolotukhina А.О., Agarkova М.А.
Severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome at 18 weeks gestation. 
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (7): 136-144 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.58

Keywords

preeclampsia
HELLP syndrome
early-onset preeclampsia

References

  1. Brown M.A., Magee L.A., Kenny L.C., Karumanchi S.A., McCarthy F.P., Saito S. et al.; International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 2018; 72(1): 24-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10803.
  2. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Преэклампсия. Эклампсия. Отеки, протеинурия и гипертензивные расстройства во время беременности, в родах и послеродовом периоде. М.; 2021. 62с. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Preeclampsia. Eclampsia. Edema, proteinuria and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Moscow; 2021. 62p. (in Russian)].
  3. Magee L.A., Smith G.N., Bloch C., Côté A.M., Jain V., Nerenberg K. et al. Guideline No. 426: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: diagnosis, prediction, prevention, and management. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2022; 44(5): 547-571.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.002.
  4. Ives C.W., Sinkey R., Rajapreyar I., Tita A.T.N., Oparil S. Preeclampsia - pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020; 76(14): 1690-702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.014.
  5. Ottanelli S., Simeone S., Serena C., Rambaldi M.P., Villanucci A., Tavella K. et al. PP120. Hydatidiform mole as a cause of eclampsia in the first trimester: a case report. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012; 2(3): 304. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.231.
  6. Lowe S.A., Bowyer L., Lust K., McMahon L.P., Morton M., North R.A. et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2014. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015; 55(5): e1-e29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12399.
  7. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Трофобластические опухоли. М.; 2020. 45с. [The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Trophoblastic tumors. Moscow; 2020. 45p. (in Russian)].
  8. Modzelewski J., Siarkowska I., Pajurek-Dudek J., Feduniw S., Muzyka-Placzyńska K., Baran A. et al. Atypical preeclampsia before 20 weeks of gestation - a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023; 24(4): 3752.https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043752.
  9. Борис Д.А., Шмаков Р.Г. Преэклампсия: современные концепции патогенеза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 12: 12-7. [Boris D.A., Shmakov R.G. Preeclampsia: modern concepts of pathogenesis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (12): 12-7. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.213.
  10. Вишнякова П.А., Ельчанинов А.В., Киселева В.В., Муминова К.Т., Ходжаева З.С., Еремина И.З., Фатхудинов Т.Х. Роль плацентарных макрофагов при физиологической беременности и преэклампсии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 4: 5-12. [Vishnyakova P.A., Elchaninov A.V., Kiseleva V.V., Muminova K.T., Khodzhaeva Z.S., Eremina I.Z., Fatkhudinov T.Kh. The role of placental macrophages in physiological pregnancy and preeclampsia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (4): 5-12. (in Russian)].https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.4.5-12.
  11. Garrido-Gómez T., Castillo-Marco N., Cordero T., Simón C. Decidualization resistance in the origin of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226(2S): S886-S894. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.039.
  12. Tabacco S., Ambrosii S., Polsinelli V., Fantasia I., D'Alfonso A., Ludovisi M. et al. Pre-eclampsia: from etiology and molecular mechanisms to clinical tools - a review of the literature. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023; 45(8): 6202-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb45080391.
  13. El-Sayed A.A.F. Preeclampsia: a review of the pathogenesis and possible management strategies based on its pathophysiological derangements. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 56(5): 593-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.004.
  14. Staff A.C., Fjeldstad H.E., Fosheim I.K., Moe K., Turowski G., Johnsen G.M. et al. Failure of physiological transformation and spiral artery atherosis: their roles in preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226(2S): S895-S906. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.026.
  15. James-Allan L.B., Whitley G.S., Leslie K., Wallace A.E., Cartwright J.E. Decidual cell regulation of trophoblast is altered in pregnancies at risk of pre-eclampsia. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018; 60(3): 239-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/JME-17-0243.
  16. Falco M.L., Sivanathan J., Laoreti A., Thilaganathan B., Khalil A. Placental histopathology associated with pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50(3): 295-301.https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17494.
  17. Sebire N.J. Placental histology findings in relation to pre-eclampsia: implications for interpretation of retrospective studies. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50(3): 291-2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17498.
  18. Wadhwani P., Saha P.K., Kalra J.K., Gainder S., Sundaram V. A study to compare maternal and perinatal outcome in early vs. late onset preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 2020; 63(3): 270-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.270.
  19. Burton G.J., Redman C.W., Roberts J.M., Moffett A. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ. 2019; 366: l2381. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2381.
  20. Hong K., Kim S.H., Cha D.H., Park H.J. Defective uteroplacental vascular remodeling in preeclampsia: key molecular factors leading to long term cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021; 22(20): 11202. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222011202.
  21. Щеголев А.И., Туманова У.Н., Ляпин В.М. Нарушения структуры и васкуляризации ворсин плаценты при преэклампсии. Гинекология. 2018; 20(4): 12-8. [Shchegolev A.I., Tumanova U.N., Lyapin V.M. Disorder of the structure and vascularization of the villi of placenta at the preeclampsia. Gynecology. 2018; 20(4): 12-8. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.26442/2079-5696_2018.4.12-18.
  22. Raymond D., Peterson E. A critical review of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2011; 66(8): 497-506. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182331028.
  23. Agrawal S., Cerdeira A.S., Redman C., Vatish M. Meta-analysis and systematic review to assess the role of soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placenta growth factor ratio in prediction of preeclampsia: the SaPPPhirE study. Hypertension. 2018; 71(2): 306-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10182.
  24. O'Gorman N., Wright D., Poon L.C., Rolnik D.L., Syngelaki A., Wright A. et al. Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 49(6): 751-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17399.
  25. Rolnik D.L., Wright D., Poon L.C.Y., Syngelaki A., O'Gorman N., de Paco Matallana C. et al. ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50(4): 492-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.18816.
  26. Холин А.М., Муминова К.Т., Балашов И.С., Ходжаева З.С., Боровиков П.И., Иванец Т.Ю., Гус А.И. Прогнозирование преэклампсии в первом триместре беременности: валидация алгоритмов скрининга на российской популяции. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017; 8: 74-84. [Kholin A.M., Muminova K.T., Balashov I.S., Khodzhaeva Z.S., Borovikov P.I.,Ivanets T.Yu., Gus A.I. First-trimester prediction of preeclampsia: validation of screening algorithms in a Russian population. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; (8): 74-84. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.8.74-84.
  27. Kenny L.C., Black M.A., Poston L., Taylor R., Myers J.E., Baker P.N. et al. Early pregnancy prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women, combining clinical risk and biomarkers: the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) international cohort study. Hypertension. 2014; 64(3): 644-52. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03578.
  28. Chaemsaithong P., Sahota D.S., Poon L.C. First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226(2S): S1071-S1097.e2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020.
  29. Poon L.C., Shennan A., Hyett J.A., Kapur A., Hadar E., Divakar H. et al.The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019; 145 Suppl. 1(Suppl. 1): 1-33.https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12802.
  30. Roberge S., Bujold E., Nicolaides K.H. Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 218(3): 287-293.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561.
  31. Zhou L., Wang Z., Wang L., Rastogi S. Evaluation of impacts of aspirin therapy versus placebo on preeclampsia: an observational study. Heliyon. 2023; 9(9): e19527. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19527.

Received 18.03.2024

Accepted 27.06.2024

About the Authors

Tatiana E. Belokrinitskaya, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Pediatric Faculty and Faculty of Professional Retraining,
Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, 672000, Russia, Chita, Gorky str., 39a, +7(3022)32-30-58,
tanbell24@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-4223
Nataly I. Frolova, Dr. Med. Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Pediatric Faculty and Faculty of Professional Retraining,
Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, 672000, Russia, Chita, Gorky str., 39a, taasyaa@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-6012
Daria S. Kargina, obstetrician-gynaecologist at the Gynecology Department, Transbaikal Regional Hospital, 672090, Russia, Chita, Kohansky str., 7,
gven2007@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-5861
Anastasiya O. Zolotukhina, Head of the Department of Pediatric and Prenatal Pathology, Transbaikal Regional Pathoanatomical Bureau, 672038, Russia, Chita,
Matveeva str., 64, zolot-anastasiya@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1136-1798
Maria А. Agarkova, Resident at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Pediatric Faculty and Faculty of Professional Retraining, Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, 672000, Russia, Chita, Gorky str., 39а, rinary_19@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4924-1475
Corresponding author: Tatiana E. Belokrinitskaya, tanbell24@mail.ru

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.