Comparative analysis of estrogen metabolites when using different forms of estrogen-containing medications in a cryo-protocol for preparation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

Kvashnina E.V., Tutakov M.A., Tomina E.V., Shilova N.V.

1) Partus Center for Rehabilitation of Reproductive Function Disorders, Yekaterinburg, Russia; 2) Gen-Lab Ltd., Moscow, Russia
Objective: To compare the levels of urinary estradiol metabolites in women with COMT rs4680 gene polymorphisms and different types of estrogen support in a cryo-protocol using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
Materials and methods: Thirty-nine ART cryo-cycles were analyzed; the level of estrone and estradiol metabolites was measured. The urinary levels of hydroxyestrone, methoxyestrone, and estradiol were estimated in women on the day of progesterone start. The indicators were comparatively analyzed according to the estrogen type used: 0.1% transdermal estradiol gel in Group 1 and estradiol valerate pills 2 mg in Group 2 after the preliminary use of GnRH agonists.
Results: The use of oral estrogens is associated with the higher urinary level (by 10 times or more) of hydroxylated forms of metabolites than that of the transdermal gel for any of the COMT gene polymorphism variants. The COMT AA and GA gene polymorphisms are related to the higher level of hydroxylated estrogen metabolic products regardless of the estrogen type used in the protocol. Thus, in women with AA polymorphism who used transdermal estradiol, the level of hydroxyl forms was 1.5 times higher than that in those with GG polymorphism (p=0.014). In women with GA polymorphism, the urinary level of these metabolites was 1.6 times higher than that in those with the GG genotype (p=0.010).
Conclusion: The cryo-protocol that uses GnRH agonists in combination with 0.1% transdermal estradiol gel is characterized by the higher level of methoxy forms of estrogen metabolites than hat of estradiol valerate pills. In patients with COMT AG and GG polymorphisms in the long protocol, it is advisable to apply transdermal estrogen as a drug that does not increase the accumulation of hydroxylated forms of estrogen metabolites.

Authors' contributions: Kvashnina E.V. – setting the task of the investigation, raw material collection, writing and editing the text of the article; Tutakov M.A. – control and collection of data from the embryological stage of the investigation; Tomina E.V. – data consolidation in an electronic worksheet; Shilova N.V. – work with literary sources, statistical processing of investigation results, writing the text of the article
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding: The article has been prepared in line with the initiative topic.
Patient Consent for Publication: All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Kvashnina E.V., Tutakov M.A., Tomina E.V., Shilova N.V. Comparative analysis of estrogen metabolites when using different forms of estrogen-containing medications in a cryo-protocol for preparation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (2): 126-133 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.17

Keywords

0.1% transdermal estradiol gel
COMT polymorphism
cryo-protocol safety
hormone replacement therapy

References

  1. Roque M., Haahr T., Geber S., Esteves S.C., Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2019; 25(1): 2-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy033.
  2. Наими З.М.С., Калинина Е.А., Донников А.Е., Алиева K.У., Дударова А.Х., Тухватуллина Я.А. Эффективность программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий при переносе эмбрионов в стимулированном цикле по сравнению с переносом криоконсервированных/размороженных эмбрионов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 6: 11-7. [Naimi Z.M.S., Kalinina E.A., Donnikov A.E., Alieva K.U., Dubarova A.H., Tukhvatullina Ya.A. Efficiency of assisted reproductive technology programs in stimulated-cycle embryo transfer versus cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2016; (6): 11-7. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2016.6.11-17.
  3. Краснопольская К.В., Назаренко Т.А., Сесина Н.И., Александрова В.Р. Программы экстракорпорального оплодотворения с эмбрионами, полученными из витрифицированных и нативных ооцитов донора. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017; 3: 75-80. [Krasnopolskaya K.V., Nazarenko T.A., Sesina N.I., Aleksandrova V.R. IVF programs using embryos obtained from vitrified and native donor oocytes. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2017; (3): 75-80. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.3.75-80.
  4. Hosseini-Najarkolaei A., Moini A., Kashani L., Farid Mojtahedi M., Hosseini-Najarkolaee E., Salehi E. The effect of letrozole versus artificial hormonal endometrial preparation on pregnancy outcome after frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020; 18(1): 115. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00675-z.
  5. Guan Y., Fan H., Styer A.K., Xiao Z., Li Z., Zhang J. et al. A modified natural cycle results in higher live birth rate in vitrified-thawed embryo transfer for women with regular menstruation. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2016; 62(5): 335-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2016.1199064.
  6. Farhud D.D., Zokaei S., Keykhaei M., Hedayati M., Zarif Yeganeh M. In-Vitro fertilization impact on the risk of breast cancer: a review article. Iran. J. Public Health. 2021; 50(3): 438-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5583.
  7. Katalinic A., Shulman Lee P., Strauss J. F., Garcia-Velasco J. A., van den Anker J.N. A critical appraisal of safety data of dydrogesterone for the support of early pregnancy: a scoping review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2022; 45(2): 365-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.032.
  8. Чагай Н.Б., Мкртумян А.М. Метаболизм эстрогенов, прижизненные нарушения процессов метилирования и рак молочной железы. Проблемы эндокринологии. 2019; 65(3): 161-73. [Chagay N.V., Mkrtumyan A.M. Estrogen metabolism, lifetime methylation disorders, and breast cancer. Problems of Endocrinology. 2019; 65(3): 161-73. (in Russian)].
  9. Sak K. The Val158Met polymorphism in COMT gene and cancer risk: role of endogenous and exogenous catechols. Drug Metab. Rev. 2017; 49(1): 56-83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2016.1258075.
  10. Квашнина Е.В., Тутаков М.А., Вахлова О.С., Томина Е.В., Шилова Н.В. Влияние заместительной гормональной терапии эстрадиолом в криопротоколах на метаболизм эстрогенов у женщин с различными полиморфизмами гена катехол-О-метилтрансферазы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 11: 213-20. [Kvashnina E.V., Tutakov M.A., Vachlova O.S., Tomina E.V., Shilova N.V. Effect of hormone replacement therapy with estradiol in frozen embryo transfer on estrogen metabolism in women with various polymorphisms of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene. Obstetrics and Gynegology. 2021; (11): 213-20. (in Russian)]. https;/dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.11.213-220.
  11. Квашнина Е.В., Тутаков М.А., Томина Е.В., Берестецкая О.С., Немсцверидзе Э.Я., Шилова Н.В. Сегментация цикла вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий как инструмент повышения эффективности преодоления бесплодия. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2019; 5: 116-23. [Kvashnina E.V., Tutakov M.A., Tomina E.V., Berestetskaya O.S., Nemstsveridze E.Ya., Shilova N.V. Segmentation of the cycle of assisted reproductive technologies as a tool to improve the efficiency of overcoming infertility. Ural Medical Journal. 2019; (5): 116-23. (in Russian)].
  12. Ланг Т.А., Сесик М. Как описывать статистику в медицине: Аннотированное руководство для авторов, редакторов и рецензентов. Пер. с англ. М.: Практическая медицина; 2010. 485с. [Lang T.A., Sesik M. How to describe statistics in medicine: an annotated cuide for authors, editors, and reviewers. Moscow: Practical Medicine; 2010. 485p. (in Russian)].
  13. Клюкина Л.А., Соснова Е.А., Ищенко А.А. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии и риск развития рака тела матки: систематический обзор и метаанализ. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2022; 71(3): 77-86. [Klyukina L.A., Sosnova E.A., Ishchenko A.A. Assisted reproductive technology and uterine cancer risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2022. 71(3): 77–86. (in Russia)].https;/dx.doi.org/10.17816/JOWD106237.
  14. Бабаева Н.А., Ашрафян Л.А., Антонова И.Б., Моцкобили Т.А., Люстик А.В. Роль метаболитов эстрогенов в патогенезе рака молочной железы, эндометрия и яичников. Вестник Российского научного центра рентгенологии. 2013; (13-1). [Babaeva N.A., Ashrafyan L.A., Antonova I.B., Motskobili T.A., Lyustik A.V. The role of estrogen metabolites in the pathogenesis of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2013; (13-1). Available at: http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik /v13/papers/babaeva_v13.htm (in Russian)].
  15. Zhai J., Jiang L., Wen A., Jia J., Zhu L., Fan B. Analysis of the relationship between COMT polymorphisms and endometriosis susceptibility. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(1): e13933. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013933.
  16. Qin X., Peng Q., Qin A., Chen Z., Lin L., Deng Y. et al. Association of COMT Val158Met polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis. Diagn. Pathol. 2012; 7: 136. https;/dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-136.
  17. Мусина Е.В., Коган И.Ю. Менопаузальная гормональная терапия:онкологические риски. Гинекология. 2020; 22(3): 29-32. [Musina E.V., Kogan I.Yu. Menopausal hormone therapy: oncological risk. Gynecology. 2020; 22(3): 29-32. (in Russian)]. https;/dx.doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2020.3.200154.
  18. Rosenberg E., Fredriksson A., Einbeigi Z., Bergh C., Strandell A. No increased risk of relapse of breast cancer for women who give birth after assisted conception. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2019; 2019(4): hoz039. https;/dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz039.

Received 26.01.2023

Accepted 01.02.2023

About the Authors

Elena V. Kvashnina, PhD, Leading Reproductive Specialist, Network of Reproductive Health Clinics "Center for IVF"; Chief Physician, clinic Center for IVF "Partus", Yekaterinburg, +7(343)288-53-39, doctor.kvashnina@gmail.com, 620026, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mamin-Sibiryak str., 171A.
Maksim A. Tutakov, Leading Embryologist, Center IVF Center Partus Clinic, Yekaterinburg, +7(343)288-53-39, tutakov@ivf-partus.ru.
620026, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mamin-Sibiryak str., 171A.
Olesya S. Vakhlova, obstetrician-gynecologist, fertility specialist, Center IVF Center Partus Clinic, Yekaterinburg, +7(343)288-53-39, dr.vakhlova@mail.ru,
620026, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mamin-Sibiryak str., 171A.
Evgenia V. Tomina, Deputy Director for Organizational and Methodological Work, Center IVF Center Partus Clinic, Yekaterinburg, +7(343)288-53-39,
tomina@ivf-partus.ru, 620026, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mamin-Sibiryak str., 171A.
Natalya V. Shilova, PhD, Gen-lab Ltd., Moscow, +7(495)774-57-57, nvshilova@gmail.com, 107078, Russia, Moscow, Kalanchevskaya str., 31-4.

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.