Pharmacokinetic properties and safety assessment of the generic vaginal gel progesterone preparation: results of an open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study

Tapilskaya N.I., Gzgzyan А.М., Kоgan I.Yu., Pisarev V.V., Merkulov М.Е., Korneeva I.E.

1) D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, St. Petersburg, Russia; 2) Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia; 3) Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia; 4) Medical Center Probiotech LLC, Moscow, Russia; 5) Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Objective: To assess bioequivalence of the generic (test) progesterone preparation Miragel, vaginal gel 90 mg/dose (WERTEX JSC, Russia) and the branded (reference) vaginal gel progesterone Crinone, 90 mg/dose (Merck Serono Limited, Great Britain).
Materials and methods: Progesterone concentrations in the blood plasma of volunteers (naturally postmenopausal women) were determined after a single intravaginal injection of the generic Miragel, vaginal gel 90 mg/dose (WERTEX JSC, Russia) and branded preparation Crinone, vaginal gel 90 mg/dose (Merck Serono Limited, Great Britain). The study was conducted using an open-label, randomized, a 4-period crossover scheme, with two sequences of medicine administration and with an interval of 14 days. A total of 42 female volunteers who met the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria were selected for participation in the study; all of them provided informed consent. The concentration of progesterone in the blood plasma samples of volunteers was determined using high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Results: Progesterone concentration was identified in 3281 blood plasma samples obtained from 42 volunteers during four study periods. The mean values and standard deviations of the pharmacokinetic parameters of progesterone after intravaginal administration of the test and reference drugs were as follows: Cmax 11.497±3.693 ng/ml and 10.912±3.651 ng/ml; AUC0-t 200.114±93.023 ng·h/ml and 225.264±134.477 ng·h/ml, respectively. Two-sided 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the corresponding geometric mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters of progesterone Cmax and AUC0-t were 100.45–111.98% and 85.28–101.41%, respectively. A total of 30 adverse events were registered in 20 volunteers of the safety population (47.6%): 18 adverse events in 14 volunteers (33.3%) after administration of the test drug and 12 adverse events in 10 volunteers (23.8%) after administration of the reference drug. No adverse events that would be reliably, probably or possibly associated with the administration of the test or reference preparations have been registered.
Conclusion: The boundaries of the estimated two-sided 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the geometric mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-t and Cmax range from 80.00 to 125.00%. Therefore, the test preparation Miragel, vaginal gel 90 mg/dose (WERTEX JSC, Russia) and the reference drug Crinone, vaginal gel 90 mg/dose (Merck Serono Limited, Great Britain), are bioequivalent.

Keywords

progesterone
vaginal gel
generic drug
reference drug
bioequivalence study

References

  1. Довжикова И.В., Луценко М.Т. Современные представления о роли прогестерона (обзор литературы). Бюллетень физиологии и патологии дыхания. 2016; 60: 94-104. [Dovzhikova I.V., Lutsenko M.T. Modern concepts of progesterone role (review). Bulletin of Physiology and Pathology of Respiration. 2016; (60): 94-104. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.12737/20128.
  2. Назаренко Т.А., Зыряева Н.А., Магамадова М.У. Эффективность гестагенов в зависимости от их состава и способа введения. Проблемы репродукции. 2013; 2: 20‑5. [Nazarenko T.A., Zyryaeva N.A., Magamadova M.U. Gestagens efficacy according to their composition and the route of administration. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2013; 2: 20‑5. (in Russian)].
  3. Тихомиров А.Л., Лубнин Д.М. Сравнительная характеристика прогестерона и синтетических прогестинов в аспекте клинического использования при терапии прогестерондефицитных состояний. РМЖ. 2003; 16: 929. [Tikhomirov A.L., Lubnin D.M. Comparative characteristics of progesterone and synthetic progestins in the aspect of clinical use in the treatment of progesterone deficiency conditions. Russian Medical Journal. 2003; 16: 929. (in Russian)].
  4. Сhild T., Leonard S.A., Evans J.S., Lass A. Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018; 36(6): 630-45.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.02.001.
  5. van der Linden M., Buckingham K., Farquhar C., Kremer J.A., Metwally M.Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 2015(7): CD009154. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3.
  6. Levy T., Yairi Y., Bar-Hava I., Shalev J., Orvieto R., Ben-Rafael Z. Pharmacokinetics of the progesterone-containing vaginal tablet and its use in assisted reproduction. Steroids. 2000; 65(10-11): 645-9.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00121-5.
  7. von Eye Corleta H., Capp E., Ferreira M.B. Pharmacokinetics of natural progesterone vaginal suppository. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2004; 58(2): 105-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000078842.
  8. Hombach J., Bernkop-Schnurch A. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2010; (197): 251-66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00477-3_9.
  9. Тихомиров А.Л. Крайнон® в коррекции функциональных нарушений менструальной функции. РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2014; 19: 1388. [Tikhomirov A.L. Kraynon® in correction of functional disorders of menstrual function. Russian Medical Journal. Mother and Child. 2014; 19: 1388. (in Russian)].
  10. Bulletti C., de Ziegler D., Flamigni C., Giacomucci E., Polli V., Bolelli G., Franceschetti F. Targetted drug delivery in gynaecology: the first uterine pass effect. Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12(5): 1073-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.5.1073.
  11. Совет Евразийской экономической комиссии. Решение от 03 ноября 2016 г. N 85 «Об утверждении Правил проведения исследований биоэквивалентности лекарственных препаратов в рамках Евразийского экономического союза». [Сouncil of the Eurasian Economic Commission. Decision of November 03, 2016 N 85 "On approval of the Rules for Conducting Bioequivalence Studies of Medicines in the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union". (in Russian)].
  12. Levine H., Watson N. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of crinone 8% administered vaginally versus Prometrium administered orally in postmenopausal women(3). Fertil. Steril. 2000; 73(3): 516-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00553-1.

Received 02.08.2022

Accepted 17.08.2022

About the Authors

Natalya I. Tapilskaya, MD, PhD, DSci (Medicine), Professor, Leading researcher at the Department of Reproduction, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Mendeleyevskaya Line 3, Russia; Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, 194100, Litovskaya 2, Russia, +7(812)328-98-22,
tapnatalia@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5309-0087
Alexander M. Gzgzyan, MD, PhD, DSci (Medicine), Head of the Department of Reproduction, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Mendeleyevskaya Line 3, Russia; Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction,
Medical Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, Russia, +7(812)328-98-22, iagmail@ott.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3917-9493
Igor Yu. Kogan, MD, PhD, DSci (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS, Director of the D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Mendeleyevskaya Line 3, Russia; Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction,
Medical Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Universitetskaya nab., 7-9, Russia, ikogan@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-6900
Vladimir V. Pisarev, MBA, Head of Medical Center Probiotech, 5-ya Kabelnaya str., 2B, Moscow, 111024, Russian Federation, vladimir.pisarev@probiotech.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3212-4369
Mikhail E. Merkulov, specialist, Medical Center Probiotek, 5-ya Kabelnaya str., 2B, Moscow, 111024, Russian Federation, mikhail.merkulov@probiotech.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-992X
Irina E. Korneeva, MD, PhD, DSci (Medicine), Professor, Senior Researcher at the Scientific and Clinical Department of Assisted Reproductive Technology named
after F. Paulsen, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation,
4 Oparin str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997, irina.korneeva@inbox.ru

Authors’ contributions: Tapilskaya N.I. – analysis of research documents, selection of material, writing the text; Gzgzyan A.M. – selection of material, writing the text; Kogan I.Yu. – final revision of the article; Pisarev V.V., Merkulov M.E. – selection of literature and statistical processing; Korneeva I.E. – assistance at the stage of drug registration, preparation of instructions and justification for the use of the drug in the clinic, testing of the drug in clinical practice.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding: The study was sponsored by WERTEX JSC, Russia.
Acknowledgements: The authors express their gratitude to Irina A. Proskurina, PhD, Head of the Department No. 2 in the Effectiveness and Safety of Drugs, Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, for assistance in preparing the article;
Alexander L. Khokhlov, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Yaroslavl State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, for conducting a clinical trial.
Patient Consent for Publication: All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Tapilskaya N.I., Gzgzyan А.М., Kоgan I.Yu., Pisarev V.V., Merkulov М.Е., Korneeva I.E. Pharmacokinetic properties and safety assessment of the generic vaginal gel progesterone preparation: results of an open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; 8: 144-152 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.8.144-152

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.