The pathogenesis and diagnosis of adenomyosis: current aspects

Dzhamalutdinova K.M., Kozachenko I.F., Gus A.I., Adamyan L.V.

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow 117997, Ac. Oparina str. 4, Russia
Objective. To analyze the data available in modern scientific literature on the pathogenesis of adenomyosis and the newest possibilities of its early diagnosis.
Subjects and methods. The review included the data of articles from international peer-reviewed databases. Different points of view on the studied topic were examined.
Results. The basic mechanisms responsible for the development of adenomyosis were described. The possibilities of current methods for its early diagnosis were analyzed, by taking into account the main pathogenetic mechanisms.
Conclusion. The change in the connecting zone (CZ) thickness and the invasion of the endometrium into the myometrium may represent very early-stage adenomyosis. The possibility for imaging the lateral boundaries of the CZ on the same 3D ultrasound image has greatly expanded the potential of echography in detecting the early changes not only in the outer myometrium, but also in the inner myometrium.

Keywords

adenomyosis
diagnosis
3D ultrasound

References

1. Адамян Л.В., ред. Cочетанные доброкачественные опухоли и гиперпластические процессы матки (миома, аденомиоз, гиперплазия эндометрия). Клинические рекомендации по ведению больных. М.; 2015. 26с. [Adamyan L.V., ed. Combined benign tumors and hyperplastic processes of the uterus (myoma, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia). Clinical recommendations for managing patients. Moscow; 2015. 26p. (in Russian)]

2. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Wattiez A., Donnez J. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 98(3): 564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1061.

3. Давыдов А.И., Пашков В.М., Шахламова М.Н. Аденомиоз: новый взгляд на старую проблему. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2016; 15(2): 59-66. [Davyidov A.I., Pashkov V.M., Shahlamova M.N. Adenomyosis: a new look at the old problem. Voprosyi ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2016; 15(2): 59-66. (in Russian)]

4. Johnson N., Hummelshoj L. World Endometriosis Society Montpellier Consortium. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2013; 28(6): 1552-68. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det050.

5. Адамян Л.В., Демидов В.Н., Гус А.И., Обельчак И.С., ред. Лучевая диагностика и терапия в акушерстве и гинекологии. Национальные руководства по лучевой диагностике и терапии. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2012: 409-51. [Adamyan L.V., Demidov V.N., Gus A.I., Obelchak I.S., ed. Radiation diagnostics and therapy in obstetrics and gynecology. National guidelines on radiation diagnosis and therapy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2012: 409-51. (in Russian)]

6. Shklyar A.A., Adamyan L.V., Kogan E.A., Gavrilova T.Y., Kozachenko I.F. Receptivity of endometrioid heterotopias with nodular and diffuse forms of adenomyosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(6, Suppl.): S171. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.636.

7. Bird C. C., McElin Th. W., Manalo-Estrella P., et al. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1972; 112: 583–93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90781-8.

8. Унанян А.Л., Сидорова И.С., Коган Е.А., Демура Т.А., Демура С.А. Активный и неактивный аденомиоз: вопросы патогенеза и патогенетической терапии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 4: 10-3. [Unanyan A.L., Sidorova I.S., Kogan E.A., Demura T.A., Demura S.A. Active and inactive adenomyosis: problems in the pathogenesis and pathogenetic therapy. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 4: 10-3. (in Russian)]

9. Benagiano G., Brosens I., Habiba M. Adenomyosis: a life-cycle approach. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2015; 30: 220-32.

10. Exacoustos C., Alabiso G., Alio L., Arena S., Barbasetti di Prun A., Bergamini V. et al. Adenomyosis: what the patient needs. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(4): 476-88.

11. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:1119–28.

12. Habiba M., Benagiano G. The role of the myometrium in adenomyosis. Uterine adenomyosis. Springer International Publishing; 2016: 81-102.

13. Brosens I., Derwig I., Brosens J., Fusi L., Benagiano G., Pijnenborg R. The enigmatic uterine junctional zone: the missing link between reproductive disorders and major obstetrical disorders? Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25(3): 569-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep474.

14. Benagiano G., Habiba M., Brosens I. The pathophysiology of uterine adenomyosis: an update. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 98(3): 572-9.

15. Acién M., Acién P. Normal embryological development of the female genital tract. Female genital tract congenital malformations. London: Springer; 2015: 3-14.

16. Elbohoty A.E.H., Tharwat A.A., Al-Mahdy M.M. Topographical distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the endometrium at anterior and posterior uterine walls. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015; 4(1): 996-1006.

17. Senturk L.M., Imamoglu M. Adenomyosis: what is new? Women’s Health. 2016; 11(5): 717-24.

18. Taran F.A., Stewart E.A., Brucker S. Adenomyosis: epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013; 73(9): 924-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350840.

19. Kunz G., Beil D., Huppert P., Noe M., Kissler S., Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis—prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20(8): 2309-16.

20. Kunz G., Herbertz M., Beil D., Huppert P., Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis as a disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2007; 15: 681-5.

21. Leyendecker G., Bilgicyildirim A., Inacker M., Stalf T., Huppert P., Mall G. et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015; 291(4): 917-32. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3437-8.

22. Koike N., Tsunemi T., Uekuri C., Akasaka J., Ito F., Shigemitsu A., Kobayashi H. Pathogenesis and malignant transformation of adenomyosis (review). Oncol. Rep. 2013; 29(3): 861-7.

23. Leyendecker G., Wildt L. A new concept of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair (TIAR). Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2011; 5(2): 125-42. doi: 10.1515/HMBCI.2011.002.

24. Mehasseb M.K., Charles Bell S., Pringle J.H., Habiba M.A. Uterine adenomyosis is associated with ultrastructural features of altered contractility in the inner myometrium. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 93(7): 2130-6.

25. Shaked S., Jaffa A.J., Grisaru D., Elad D. Uterine peristalsis-induced stresses within the uterine wall may sprout adenomyosis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2015; 14(3): 437-44.

26. Tocci A., Greco E., Ubaldi F.M. Adenomyosis and ‘endometrialsubendometrial myometrium unit disruption disease’ are two different entities. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2008; 2: 281-91.

27. Stamatopoulos C.P., Mikos T., Grimbizis G.F., Dimitriadis A.S., Efstratiou I., Stamatopoulos P. et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of adenomyosis and myomas of the uterus. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19: 620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.06.003.

28. Бурлев В.А., Ильясова Н.А., Гаврилова Т.Ю. Дополнительные критерии оценки стадий распространения аденомиоза. Проблемы репродукции. 2006; 3: 6-9. [Burlev V.A., Ilyasova N.A., Gavrilova T.Yu. Additional criteria for assessing the stages of adenomyosis spread. Problemyi reproduktsii. 2006; 3: 6-9. (in Russian)]

29. Шкляр А.А., Адамян Л.В., Коган Е.А., Парамонова Н.Б., Козаченко И.Ф., Гаврилова Т.Ю., Кононов С.Н. Трудности диагностики узловой и диффузной форм аденомиоза. Акушерство и гинекология. 2015; 3: 67-72. [Shklyar A.A., Adamyan L.V., Kogan E.A., Paramonova N.B., Kozachenko I.F., Gavrilova T.Yu., Kononov S.N. Difficulties in diagnosing nodular and diffuse adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; (3): 67-72. (in Russian)]

30. Henderson I., Raine-Fenning N., Asif S. Adenomyosis and its effect on reproductive outcomes. J Womens Health Care. 2014; 3 207. doi: 10.4172/2167-0420.1000207.

31. Luciano D.E., Exacoustos C., Albrecht L., LaMonica R., Proffer A., Zupi E., Luciano A.A. Three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(6): 803-10.

32. Kepkep K., Tuncay Y.A., Goynumer G., Tutal E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 30(3): 341-5.

33. Ahmed A.I., Mahmoud A.E.A., Fadiel A.A., Frederick N. Comparison of 2-, 3D and Doppler ultrasound with histological findings in adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2007; 88(Suppl. 1): S82.

34. Exacoustos C., Brienza L., Di Giovanni A., Szabolcs B., Romanini M.E., Zupi E. et al. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;37(4): 471-9.

Received 09.06.2017

Accepted 23.06.2017

About the Authors

Dzhamalutdinova Kistaman M., postgraduate student of the Department of Operative Gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +79168881210. E-mail: DK0590@mail.ru
Kozachenko Irena F., Ph.D., Senior Researcher of the Department of Operative Gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4
Gus Alexander I., MD, Professor, Head of the Functional Diagnostics Department, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4
Adamyan Leyla V., MD, professor, deputy. director and head of the department of operative gynecology, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology,
and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +74952223737. Email: Adamyanleila@gmail.com

For citations: Dzhamalutdinova K.M., Kozachenko I.F., Gus A.I., Adamyan L.V. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of adenomyosis: current aspects.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; (1): 29-34. (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.1.29-34

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.