Clinical and anatomical features of patients with apical prolapse
Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Matskevich E.N.
Objective: To study clinical and anatomical features of patients with apical prolapse (AP).
Materials and methods: 230 medical records of patients with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent examination and treatment from 2019 to 2024 at the University Clinic "I am healthy!" were analyzed. The main patient group consisted of 130 women with apical prolapse, the comparison group included 100 patients with anterior/posterior vaginal wall prolapse without apical prolapse. Evaluation was performed according to the POP-Q classification, using standard questionnaires (POPDI-6, UDI-6) and clinical examination.
Results: Patients with apical prolapse more often reported incomplete bladder emptying and the need to reduce prolapse to ease voiding. In the comparison group, stress urinary incontinence and lower abdominal pressure were more common. In almost half of the patients with apical prolapse, the leading point was Ba (44.6%). In patients without apical prolapse, prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall (point Bp) occurred most often (62%). No significant differences in symptoms were found between the groups, which complicates the early diagnosis of apical prolapse.
Conclusion: When examining the patients with pelvic organ prolapse and collecting their history, it is necessary to take into account the "pitfalls" that complicate objective diagnosis of apical prolapse. It is necessary to improve the technique of physical examination of gynecological patients for early detection of first-level support defects, which will allow timely prescription of adequate treatment with the best long-term results.
Authors’ contributions: Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S. – study concept and design, editing; Matskevich E.N. – data collection and analysis; Matskevich E.N., Dubinskaya E.D. – text writing.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest with respect to this publication.
Funding: The study was performed without external funding.
Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee of Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
Patient Consent for Publication: All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Matskevich E.N. Clinical and
anatomical features of patients with apical prolapse.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (7): 130-137 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.154
Keywords
References
- Brown H.W., Hegde A., Huebner M., Neels H., Barnes H.C., Marquini G.V. et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(2): 173-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05018-z
- Zumrutbas A.E. Understanding pelvic organ prolapse: a comprehensive review of etiology, epidemiology, comorbidities, and evaluation. Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025; 6: 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/siuj6010006
- Hadizadeh-Talasaz Z., Khadivzadeh T., Mohajeri T., Sadeghi M. Worldwide prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran. J. Public. Health. 2024; 53(3): 524-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i3.15134
- Смольнова Т.Ю., Красный А.М., Чупрынин В.Д., Садекова А.А., Чурсин В.В., Тамбиева Ф.Р. Способ хирургической коррекции пролапса гениталий у пациентки со сниженным уровнем экспрессии гена CACNA1C в круглых связках матки. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 12: 234-41. [Smolnova T.Yu., Krasny A.M., Chuprynin V.D., Sadekova A.A., Chursin V.V., Tambieva F.R. Smolnova T.Yu., Krasnyi A.M., Chuprynin V.D., Sadekova A.A., Chursin V.V., Tаmbieva F.R. Surgical procedure to correct genital prolapse in a patient with reduced CACNA1C gene expression in the round ligament of the uterus. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (12): 234-41 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.12.234-241
- Komesu Y.M., Dinwiddie D.L., Richter H.E., Lukacz E.S., Sung V.W., Siddiqui N.Y. et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 222(2): 154.e1-e10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.011
- Kowalski J.T., Barber M.D., Klerkx W.M., Grzybowska M.E., Toozs-Hobson P., Rogers R.G. et al. International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(11): 2689-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05660-9
- Patnam R., Edenfield A., Swift S. Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2020; 30(1): 47-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3681-8
- Trutnovsky G., Robledo K.P., Shek K.L., Dietz H.P. Definition of apical descent in women with and without previous hysterectomy: a retrospective analysis. PLOS One. 2019; 14(3): e0213617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213617
- Dietz H.P., Mann K.P. What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2014; 25(4): 451-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2307-4
- Oh S., Shin E.K., Lee S.Y., Kim M.J., Lee Y., Jeon M.J. Anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse in urogynecology populations. Urogynecology. 2023; 29(11): 860-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001383
- Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Babichev A.I., Kolesnikova S.N. Improving of long-term follow-up after cystocele repair. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2022; 51(2): 102278. https://dx.doi.org/0.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102278
- Szymanowski P., Szepieniec W. K., Szweda H., Ligeza J., Sadakierska-Chudy A. Apical defect - the essence of cystocele pathogenesis? Ginekol Pol. 2024; 95 (7): 511-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2023.0022
- Haylen B.T., Maher C.F., Barber M.D., Camargo S., Dandolu V., Digesu A. et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(2): 165-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1
- Barber M.D., Walters M.D., Bump R.C. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193(1): 103-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
- Gray T., Strickland S., Pooranawattanakul S., Li W., Campbell P., Jones G. et al. What are the concerns and goals of women attending a urogynaecology clinic? Content analysis of free-text data from an electronic pelvic floor assessment questionnaire (ePAQ-PF). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019; 30(1): 33-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3697-0
- Cichowski S., Grzybowska M. E., Halder G. E., Jansen S., Gold D., Espuña M. et al. International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022; 33(10): 2603-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1
- Безменко А.А., Захаров И.С., Беженарь В.Ф., Староверова А.С., Баграмян Э.А., Иванова О.А., Капитанова М.В. Анатомо-функциональные особенности тазового дна женщин в различные возрастные периоды. Акушерство и гинекология. 2025; 6: 131-8. [Bezmenko A.A., Zakharov I.S., Bezhenar V.F., Staroverova A.S., Bagramyan E.A., Ivanova O.A., Kapitanova M.V. Anatomical and functional characteristics of the pelvic floor in women of various age groups. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (6): 131-8 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.101
- Tegerstedt G., Miedel A., Maehle-Schmidt M., Nyren O., Hammarström M. A short-form questionnaire identified genital organ prolapse. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2005; 58(1): 41-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.008
- Collins S.A., O'Shea M., Dykes N., Ramm O., Edenfield A., Shek K.L. et al. International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2021; 32(8): 2011-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04875-y
- Hong C.X., Nandikanti L., Shrosbree B., Delancey J.O., Chen L. Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023; 34(8): 1923-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05482-9
- Маринкин И.О., Ракитин Ф.А., Волчек А.В., Солуянов М.Ю., Кулешов В.М., Макаров К.Ю., Соколова Т.М., Нимаев В.В., Айдагулова С.В. Проявления недифференцированной дисплазии соединительной ткани и прогнозирование рецидивов при хирургической коррекции переднего пролапса тазовых органов у женщин. Акушерство и гинекология. 2024; 12: 70-9. [Marinkin I.O., Rakitin F.A., Volchek A.V., Soluyanov M.Yu., Kuleshov V.M., Makarov K.Yu., Sokolova T.M., Nimaev V.V., Aidagulova S.V. Manifestations of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia and prediction of recurrence after surgical correction of anterior pelvic organ prolapse in women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (12): 70-9 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.208
Received 11.06.2025
Accepted 03.07.2025
About the Authors
Ekaterina D. Dubinskaya, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia,8 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russia, +7(903)117-55-58, eka-dubinskaya@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-0381
Alexander S. Gasparov, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University
of Russia, 8 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russia, +7(985)776-77-78, 13513520@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-1880
Elizaveta N. Matskevich, Teaching Assistant at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Faculty of Postgraduate Education, Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 5-2 General Antonov str., Moscow, 117342, Russia, +7(911)176-66-94, liza151196chik@mail.ru,
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3315-7408
Corresponding author: Ekaterina D. Dubinskaya, eka-dubinskaya@yandex.ru