Perinatal audit and a “neonatal near miss” model as a current form of care quality control in neonatology
Objective. To carry out a systematic analysis of the data available in modern literature on the current forms of medical care quality control in neonatology.Bushtyrev V.A., Zubkov V.V., Kuznetsova N.B., Barinova V.V.
Material and methods. The review includes the data of foreign and Russian articles published in the past 5 years and found in Pubmed on this topic.
Results. Targeted attention is given to a „neonatal near miss” model that evaluates „almost dead” neonatal cases. In addition, close attention is paid to the management model of perinatal clinical audit; and its classification in neonatology and methodology are presented, and the efficiency is evaluated to make management decisions for restructuring the service,
Conclusion. The data presented in the review confirm that the use of current management techniques (perinatal audit and a „neonatal near miss” allows not only decision-making on the optimization and reorganization of obstetric-gynecological and neonatal services, but also staff training, estimation of the real cost of health care, and calculation of its economic efficiency.
Keywords
References
1. Korotkova A.V., Skachkova E.I. The quality and control. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2010; 5: 10-5. (in Russian)
2. Bashmakova N.V., Filippov O.S., Malgina G.B., Davydenko N.B., Litvinova A..M Perinatal audit. Modern methodology. Guidelines. Moscow; 2014. (in Russian)
3. Peterson M.C. A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2009; 84(3): 248-54.
4. Pattinson R.C., Hall M. Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. Br. Med. Bull. 2003; 67: 231-43.
5. Graham W.J. Criterion-based clinical audit in obstetrics: bridging the quality gap? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 23(3): 375-88.
6. Pileggi C., Souza J.P., Cecatti J.G., Faundes A. Neonatal near miss approach in the 2005 WHO Global Survey Brazil. J. Pediatr. (Rio J.). 2010;86(1): 21-6.
7. Pileggi-Castro C., Camelo J.S., Perdoná G.C., Mussi-Pinhata M.M., Cecatti J.G., Mori R. et al. Development of criteria for identifying neonatal near-miss cases: analysis of two WHO multicountry cross-sectional studies. BJOG. 2014; 121(Suppl. 1): 110-8.
8. Цели развития тысячелетия. Доклад за 2015 год. Нью-Йорк: ООН; 2015. (The millennium development goals report 2015. New York: United Nations; 2015.) Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/MDG/english/UNDP_MDGReport_EN_2014Final1.pdf
9. Avenant T. Neonatal near miss: a measure of the quality of obstetric care. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 23(3): 369-74.
10. Santos J.P., Cecatti J.G., Serruya S.J., Almeida P.V., Duran P., de Mucio B. et al.; for the PAHO Neonatal Near Miss Working Group. Neonatal Near Miss: the need for a standard definition, appropriate criteria and rationale for a prospective surveillance system. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015; 70(12): 820-6.
11. Dorling J.S., Field D.J., Manktelow B. Neonatal disease severity scoring systems. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005; 90(1): F11-6.
12. Mukwevo M.T.P., Avenant T., Pattinson R.C. Developing a practical clinical definition of severe acute neonatal morbidity to evaluate obstetric care: a pilot study. In: Presentation at the 27th conference on priorities in perinatal care in Southern Africa. Hartenbos; March 2007.
13. Santos J.P., Pileggi-Castro C., Camelo J.S. Jr., Silva A.A., Duran P., Serruya S.J., Cecatti J.G. Neonatal near miss: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15: 320. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0758-y.
14. Witteveen T., de Koning I., Bezstarosti H., van den Akker T., van Roosmalen J., Bloemenkamp K.W. Validating the WHO Maternal Near Miss Tool in a highincome country. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2016; 95(1): 106-11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12793.
15. Indeykin E.N. Clinical audit: the UK experience. Kachestvo meditsinskoy pomoschi. 2002; 2: 45-53. (in Russian)
16. Klimkovskaya N.V., Firsov I.S. An audit of clinical research. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika. 2002; 3: 10-21. (in Russian)
17. Зубков В.В., Рюмина И.И., Евтеева Н.В., Юденков Д.И. Результаты проведения клинического аудита инфекционно-воспалительных заболеваний у новорожденных. Акушерство и гинекология. 2012; 7: 74-9. [Zubkov V.V., Ryumina I.I., Evteyeva N.V., Yudenkov D.I. Results of clinical audit of neonatal infectious and inflammatory diseases. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; (7): 74-9. (in Russian)
18. Dunn P.M. Perinatal audit in Europe. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997; 104(8):875-6.
19. Mancey-Jones M., Brugha R.F. Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review. Health Policy Plan. 1997; 12(3): 183-92.
20. Pattinson R. Near miss audit in obstetrics. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 23(3): 285–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.013.
21. Lawn J.E. et al. Statistika annex – the World Health Report 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
22. Baybarina E.N., Sorokina Z.H. Expert analysis of the quality of neonatal care as a method of perinatal audit. Problemyi upravleniya zdravoohraneniem. 2011; 1: 34-40. (in Russian)
23. Maresh M. Audit in obstetrics and gynaecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ.; 1994.
24. Graham W., Wagaarachchi P., Penney G., McCaw-Binns A., Antwi Y., Hall M.H. Criteria for clinical audit of the quality of hospital-based obstetric care in developing countries. Bull. World Health Organ. 2000; 78(5): 614-20.
25. Wagaarachchi P.T., Graham W.J., Penny G.C., McCaw-Binns A., Antwi Y. Conducting Criterion-based clinical audit of obstetric care: a practical field guide. Aberdeen, Dugald Baird Centre for Research on Women’s Health; 2001.
26. Criterion-based audit manual. New York, NY, AMDD Columbia University; 2003 (internet communication of May 2003 an web site http:cpmcnet.columia.edu/dept/sph/popfam/amdd/resources.html).
27. Penney G.C. Audit. In: O’Brien P.M.S., Broughton Pipkin F., eds. Introduction to research methodology for specialists and trainees. London, RCOG Press; 1999: 94-106.
28. Filippi V., Ronsmans C., Graham W.J., Gandaho T., Alihonou E. The ‘near-misses’: are life-threatening complications practical indicators for safe motherhood programmes? In: Paper presented at IUSSP seminar on innovative approaches to the assessment of reproductive health. Manila, Philippines, 24-27 September 1996.
29. Sivalingam N., Looi K.W. Clinical experience with management of “near-miss” cases in obstetrics. Med. J. Malaysia. 1999; 54(4): 496-503.
30. Gandhi M., Barnard A., West P., Siderfin C., Weiz T., Martineau A. et al. Audit of perinatal mortality and acute maternal morbidity in northern KwaZulu-Natal. Health Systems Trust Update (Issue 45), Durban, Health Systems Trust, 1999.
Received 16.08.2016
Accepted 02.09.2016
About the Authors
Bushtyrev Valeriy Alexandrovich, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Ph.D., Head of the Rostov Regional Perinatal Center.344068, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Bodraya str. 90. Tel.: +7863235-15-31, +78632357905. E-mail: perinatal-rost@mail.ru
Zubkov Viktor Vasilyevich, MD, Professor, MD, Head of the Division of Neonatology and Pediatrics, Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology,
Ministry of Health of Russia. 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4. Tel.: +74954382266. E-mail: victor.zubkov@mail.ru
Kuznetsova Natalia Borisovna, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 4, Rostov State Medical University.
344022, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Nahichevansky per. 29. Tel.: +78632504200. E-mail: lauranb@inbox.ru
Barinova Victoria Vladislavovna, PhD, assistant of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 4, Rostov State Medical University.
344022, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Nahichevansky per. 29. Tel.: +78632504200. E-mail: victoria-barinova@yandex.ru
For citations: Bushtyrev V.A., Zubkov V.V., Kuznetsova N.B., Barinova V.V. Perinatal audit and a “neonatal near miss” model as a current form of care quality control in neonatology. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; (2): 17-22. (in Russian)
http://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.2.17-22