ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

The role of women's preventive reproductive health surveillance in preservation of the nation's reproductive potential

Kotova E.G., Dolgushina N.V., Sakharova V.V.

1) Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; 2) National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Rationale: Since 2024, reproductive health surveillance (RHS) have been included in the government program guaranteeing free medical care for Russian citizens. The primary goal of RHS is the timely detection of reproductive system diseases and their associated risk factors that may affect fertility, course of pregnancy, childbirth, and health of future children.
Objective: To analyze the results of RHS for women aged 18–49 years in 2024–2025 and assess the effectiveness of measures for the proactive detection of reproductive system diseases.
Materials and methods: The following information was used for the analysis: (1) updated information on the results of RHS implementation in the framework of territorial compulsory health insurance (CHI) programs, provided by the Federal Fund of Compulsory Health Insurance for 2024 and 2025; (2) updated information on the diseases identified by RHS, provided by the regions of the Russian Federation to the Portal of Automated Monitoring of Medical Statistics (The Russian Research Institute of Health ("TsNIIOIZ"), Ministry of Health of Russia) for 2024 and 2025; (3) data from Federal Statistical Observation (FSO) form No. 12, "Information on the number of diseases registered in patients living in the coverage area of a medical organization," for 2020–2025.
Results: The RHS results demonstrated that one in five women aged 18–49 years was at risk of a disease of reproductive system; the most common risk factors were overweight/obesity, smoking, and diseases associated with high blood pressure. RHS identified reproductive system diseases in 12.4% and 14.4% of women in 2024 and 2025, respectively. Menstrual disorders, pelvic inflammatory disease, uterine leiomyomas, and endometriosis were the most common gynecological morbidities. The prevalence of infertility was 6.4 per 1,000 women aged 18–49 years. An important outcome of the RHS was early detection of breast and cervical cancer. The incidence of diseases detected through RHS corresponded to the incidence of diseases in working-age women, as reported in FSO form No. 12. The implementation of the RHS led to an increase in the detection of reproductive system diseases through preventive medical check-ups and screenings.
Conclusion: The study shows the positive role of RHS in increasing the accessibility and quality of primary specialized healthcare for the early detection and treatment of reproductive system diseases.

Authors’ contributions: Kotova E.G. – conception and design of the study, critical manuscript review, final manuscript version approval; Dolgushina N.V. – data analysis and systematization, drafting of the manuscript; Sakharova V.V. – concept discussion, editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding: There was no funding for this study.
For citation: Kotova E.G., Dolgushina N.V., Sakharova V.V. The role of women's preventive reproductive health surveillance in preservation of the nation's reproductive potential.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2026; (4): 5-13 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2026.103

Keywords

reproductive health
reproductive system
medical check-up
gynecological morbidity
prevention

References

  1. Аполихин. О.И., Гвасалия Б.Р., Долгушина Н.В. Драпкина О.М., Дроздова Л.Ю., Дудкина В.Я. и др. Методические рекомендации по диспансеризации мужчин и женщин репродуктивного возраста с целью оценки репродуктивного здоровья. 2026. 34 c. Доступно по: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/413725546/#review [Apolikhin O.I., Gvasalia B.R., Dolgushina N.V. Drapkina O.M., Drozdova L.Yu., Dudkina V.Ya. et al. Methodological recommendations on the medical examination of men and women of reproductive age in order to assess their reproductive health. 2026. 34 p. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/413725546/#review (in Russian)].
  2. GBD 2021 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024; 403(10440): 2162-203. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4
  3. Amiri M., Hatoum S., Hopkins D., Buyalos R.P., Ezeh U., Pace L.A. et al. The association between obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome: an epidemiologic study of observational data. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2024; 109(10): 2640-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae488
  4. Rahman M.S., Park Y., Hosseinirad H., Shin J.H., Jeong J.W. The interplay between endometriosis and obesity. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2025; 36(12): 1140-53. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2025.03.011
  5. Wise M.R., Jordan V., Lagas A., Showell M., Wong N., Lensen S. et al. Obesity and endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in premenopausal women: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 214(6): 689.e1-e17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.175
  6. Dağ Z.Ö., Dilbaz B. Impact of obesity on infertility in women. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2015; 16(2): 111-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2015.15232
  7. Bautista-Castaño I., Henriquez-Sanchez P., Alemán-Perez N., Garcia-Salvador J.J., Gonzalez-Quesada A., García-Hernández J.A. et al. Maternal obesity in early pregnancy and risk of adverse outcomes. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e80410. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080410
  8. Stang J., Huffman L.G. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: obesity, reproduction, and pregnancy outcomes. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016; 16(4): 677-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.01.008
  9. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global Burden of Disease 2023: Findings from the GBD 2023 Study. Seattle, WA: IHME, 2025.
  10. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2025: warning about the dangers of tobacco. 23 June 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240112063
  11. Salmasi G., Grady R., Jones J., McDonald S.D. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2010; 89(4): 423-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016340903505748
  12. Castles A., Adams E.K., Melvin C.L., Kelsch C., Boulton M.L. Effects of smoking during pregnancy. Five meta-analyses. Am. J. Prev. Med. 1999; 16(3): 208-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00089-0
  13. Dietz P.M., England L.J., Shapiro-Mendoza C.K., Tong V.T., Farr S.L., Callaghan W.M. Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the U.S. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010; 39(1): 45-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.009
  14. Li Y.F., Langholz B., Salam M.T., Gilliland F.D. Maternal and grandmaternal smoking patterns are associated with early childhood asthma. Chest. 2005; 127(4): 1232-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.4.1232
  15. Søndergaard C., Henriksen T.B., Obel C., Wisborg K. Smoking during pregnancy and infantile colic. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(2): 342-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.342
  16. von Kries R., Toschke A.M., Koletzko B., Slikker W. Jr. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and childhood obesity. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002; 156(10): 954-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf128
  17. Бойцов С.А., Баланова Ю.А., Шальнова С.А., Деев А.Д., Артамонова Г.В., Гатагонова Т.М. и др. Артериальная гипертония среди лиц 25–64 лет: распространенность, осведомленность, лечение и контроль. По материа­лам исследования ЭССЕ. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2014; 13(4): 4-14. [Boytsov S.A., Balanova Yu.A., Shalnova S.A., Deev A.D., Artamonova G.V., Gatagonova T.M. et al. Arterial hypertension among individuals of 25–64 years old: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control. By the data from ECCD. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2014; 13(4): 4-14 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2014-4-4-14
  18. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021; 398(10304): 957-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1
  19. Williams B., Mancia G., Spiering W., Agabiti Rosei E., Azizi M., Burnier M. et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39(33): 3021-104. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339
  20. Lo J.O., Mission J.F., Caughey A.B. Hypertensive disease of pregnancy and maternal mortality. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 25(2): 124-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835e0ef5
  21. Sukmanee J, Liabsuetrakul T. Risk of future cardiovascular diseases in different years postpartum after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(30): e29646. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.00000000029646
  22. Wambua S., Singh M., Okoth K., Snell K.I.E., Riley R.D., Yau C. et al. Association between pregnancy-related complications and development of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women: an umbrella review. BMC Med. 2024; 22(1): 66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03284-4
  23. Atkinson J.A., Gordon H.G., Tong S., Walker S.P., Mehdipour P., Lindquist A.C. et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and childhood neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2025; 22(9): e1004558. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004558
  24. Henry E.B., Patterson C.C., Cardwell C.R. A meta-analysis of the association between pre-eclampsia and childhood-onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2011; 28(8): 900-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03291.x
  25. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Аномальные маточные кровотечения. 2024. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Abnormal uterine bleeding. 2024 (in Russian)].
  26. Munro M.G., Critchley H.O.D., Fraser I.S. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018; 143(3): 393-408. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12666
  27. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Воспалительные болезни шейки матки, влагалища и вульвы. 2025. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Inflammatory diseases of the cervix, vagina, and vulva. 2025 (in Russian)].
  28. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Воcпалительные болезни женских тазовых органов. 2024. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Inflammatory diseases of the female pelvic organs. 2024 (in Russian)].
  29. Савельева Г.М., Сухих Г.Т., Серов В.Н., Манухин И.Б., Радзинский В.Е., ред. Гинекология. Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2020: 303-45. [Savelyeva G.M., Sukhikh G.T., Serov V.N., Manukhin I.B., Radzinsky V.E., eds. Gynecology. National Guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020: 303-45 (in Russian)].
  30. Sexually transmitted diseases: Summary of 2015 CDC Treatment Guidelines. J. Miss. State Med. Assoc. 2015; 56(12): 372-5.
  31. World Health Organization. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). 10 September 2025. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis)
  32. Parazzini F., Esposito G., Tozzi L., Noli S., Bianchi S. Epidemiology of endometriosis and its comorbidities. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 209: 3-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.021
  33. Management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 137(6): 1131-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004403
  34. Stewart E.A., Cookson C.L., Gandolfo R.A., Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017; 124(10): 1501-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14640
  35. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации. Миома матки. 2024. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Uterine fibroids. 2024 (in Russian)].
  36. Zepiridis L.I., Grimbizis G.F., Tarlatzis B.C. Infertility and uterine fibroids. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016; 34: 66-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.12.001
  37. Parazzini F., Tozzi L., Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine fibroids. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016; 34: 74-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.017

Received 26.03.2026

Accepted 14.04.2026

About the Authors

Evgeniya G. Kotova, PhD (Medicine), Deputy Minister of Health of the Russian Federation, 127994, Russia, Moscow, Rakhmanovsky per., 3,
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2025-3157
Nataliya V. Dolgushina, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Deputy Director for Research, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparin str., 4, n_dolgushina@oparina4.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-138X
Victoria V. Saharovа, PhD (Medicine), Deputy Director, Department of Child’s Health Care, Maternity and Public Health Services, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 127994, Russia, Moscow, Rakhmanovsky per., 3, https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4996-5542
Corresponding author: Nataliya V. Dolgushina, n_dolgushina@oparina4.ru

Similar Articles