ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

Small for gestational age fetus: clinical, anamnestic, and perinatal aspects

Sidelnikova M.D., Kan N.E., Tyutyunnik V.L., Soldatova E.E., Zolotareva A.P., Alieva L.E.

1) Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia; 2) Primorsky Krai Perinatal Center, Vladivostok, Russia

Objective. To identify the clinical characteristics and maternal history factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes among pregnancies complicated by a small for gestational age fetus.
Materials and methods. This retrospective cohort study included 405 pregnant women with a prenatal diagnosis of a small for gestational age fetus who delivered at the V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P between 2020 and 2025. This study included patients with singleton full-term pregnancies. Cases of multiple pregnancies, surrogacy, preterm birth, and pregnancies with diagnosed chromosomal abnormalities or fetal malformations were excluded from the study. The overall cohort was divided into two groups: those with favorable and those with unfavorable perinatal outcomes. An unfavorable outcome was defined as a neonatal condition with critical prognostic significance and a range of associated neonatal conditions (pathological adaptation). Clinical and anamnestic data, pregnancy and childbirth characteristics, and early neonatal period were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using JASP (Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, p<0.05).
Results. The study found that 24% of pregnant women carrying a fetus diagnosed as small for gestational age experienced adverse perinatal outcomes, despite having no apparent signs of fetal distress during antenatal surveillance. The analysis revealed that differences in pregnancy outcomes were specifically associated with small for gestational age rather than the demographic or reproductive characteristics of the patients. Significant risk factors for adverse outcomes included low prenatal birth weight, history of spontaneous miscarriages and placenta-associated pregnancy complications, gynecological diseases (uterine fibroids and uterine anomalies), and pregnancy complications (threatened miscarriage, retrochorial hematoma, anemia, gestational hypertension, and oligohydramnios). Antenatal fetal weight assessment has limited prognostic value.
Conclusion. A small for gestational age fetus is a clinically heterogeneous condition with varying prognoses. Almost a quarter of small-for-gestational-age fetuses experience adverse perinatal outcomes, which represents a significant proportion and necessitates the search for new diagnostic options to identify these fetuses.

Authors' contributions. Sidelnikova M.D., Kan N.E., Tyutyunnik V.L., Soldatova E.E., Zolotareva A.P., Alieva L.E. – conception and design of the study, data acquisition, review of relevant literature, material processing and analysis, statistical analysis, drafting of the manuscript, editing of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding. There was no funding for this study.
Ethical Approval. The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P.
Generative Artificial Intelligence. No artificial intelligence tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.
Patient Consent for Publication. All patients provided informed consent for the publication of their data.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement. The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Sidelnikova M.D., Kan N.E., Tyutyunnik V.L., Soldatova E.E., Zolotareva A.P., Alieva L.E. 
Small for gestational age fetus: clinical, anamnestic, and perinatal aspects.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2026; (9): 78-86 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2026.107

Keywords

small for gestational age fetus
fetal growth restriction
perinatal outcomes
clinical and anamnestic factors

References

  1. Miranda J., Paules C., Noell G., Youssef L., Paternina-Caicedo A., Crovetto F. et al. Similarity network fusion to identify phenotypes of small-for-gestational-age fetuses. iScience. 2023; 26(9): 107620. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107620
  2. Yang L., Feng L., Huang L., Li X., Qiu W., Yang K. et al. Maternal factors for intrauterine growth retardation: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Reprod. Sci. 2023; 30(6): 1737-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00756-3
  3. Devaguru A., Gada S., Potpalle D., Dinesh Eshwar M., Purwar D. The prevalence of low birth weight among newborn babies and its associated maternal risk factors: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2023; 15(5): e38587. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38587
  4. Fetal Growth Restriction. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 137(2): e16-e28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251
  5. Dapkekar P., Bhalerao A., Kawathalkar A., Vijay N. Risk factors associated with intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. Cureus. 2023; 15(6): e40178. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40178
  6. Barzilai R., Bronshtein M., Steinberg M., Weiner Z., Gover A. Small for gestational age: the familial perspective. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2022; 35(20): 3840-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1841160
  7. Fasoulakis Z., Koutras A., Antsaklis P., Theodora M., Valsamaki A., Daskalakis G. et al. Intrauterine growth restriction due to gestational diabetes: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(6): 1139. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061139
  8. Mohammad N., Sohaila A., Rabbani U., Ahmed S., Ahmed S., Ali S.R.Maternal predictors of intrauterine growth retardation. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2018; 28(9): 681-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2018.09.681
  9. Liang W., Yan X., Shi Y., Chen B., An L., Huang B. et al. Association between graded subchorionic hematoma and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a prospective observational cohort study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024; 309(2): 541-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06943-8
  10. Щеголев А.И., Туманова У.Н., Серов В.Н. Роль плаценты в развитии поражений головного мозга новорожденного. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 8: 38-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.185 [Shchegolev A.I., Tumanova U.N., Serov V.N. The role of the placenta in the development of brain damage in newborns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (8): 38-47. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.185].
  11. Волочаева М.В., Тимофеева А.В., Федоров И.С., Кан Н.Е., Тютюнник В.Л., Рыжова К.О., Гасымова Ш.Р. Модель диагностики задержки роста плода с использованием функциональных методов исследования. Акушерство и гинекология. 2025; 2: 31-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.15 [Volochaeva M.V., Timofeeva A.V., Fedorov I.S., Kan N.E., Tyutyunnik V.L., Ryzhova K.O., Gasymova Sh.R. Model for diagnosing fetal growth restriction using functional research methods. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (2): 31-9. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.15].
  12. Волочаева М.В., Кан Н.Е., Тютюнник В.Л., Леонова А.А., Солдатова Е.Е., Рыжова К.О. Особенности постнатального развития детей с задержкой роста (катамнестическое исследование). Акушерство и гинекология. 2025; 3: 65-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.32 [Volochaeva M.V., Kan N.E., Tyutyunnik V.L., Leonova A.A., Soldatova E.E., Ryzhova K.O. Features of postnatal development of children with growth retardation (follow-up study). Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (3): 65-71. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.32].
  13. Meler E., Mazarico E., Eixarch E., Gonzalez A., Peguero A., Martinez J. et al. Ten-year experience of protocol-based management of small-for-gestational-age fetuses: perinatal outcome in late-pregnancy cases diagnosed after 32 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 57(1): 62-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23537
  14. Alda M.G., Holberton J., MacDonald T.M., Charlton J.K. Small for gestational age at preterm birth identifies adverse neonatal outcomes more reliably than antenatal suspicion of fetal growth restriction. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2023; 36(2): 2279017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2279017
  15. Sun L., Lee F.T., Milligan N., Zhu M., van Amerom J.F.P., Saini B.S. et al. Neurodevelopment among infants with late-onset fetal growth restriction. JAMA Netw. Open. 2025; 8(6): e2517360. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17360

Received 01.04.2026

Accepted 01.09.2026

About the Authors

Maria D. Sidelnikova, Obstetrician-Gynecologist at the 1st Obstetric Physiological Department, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4, +7(903)220-45-13, m_sidelnikova@oparina4.ru,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0805-4703
Natalia E. Kan, Professor, Dr. Med. Sci., Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Deputy Director General for Research – Director of the Institute of Obstetrics, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow,
Ac. Oparina str., 4, kan-med@mail.ru, Researcher ID: B-2370-2015, SPIN-code: 5378-8437, Authors ID: 624900, Scopus Author ID: 57008835600,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-5946
Victor L. Tyutyunnik, Professor, Dr. Med. Sci., Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Leading Researcher at the Center of Scientific and Clinical Researches, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4, tioutiounnik@mail.ru, Researcher ID: B-2364-2015, SPIN-code: 1963-1359, Authors ID: 213217, Scopus Author ID: 56190621500, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-5099
Ekaterina E. Soldatova, PhD, Researcher at the Institute of Obstetrics, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4, katerina.soldatova95@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-3403
Anna P. Zolotareva, PhD candidate, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4; Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Day Hospital Department for Pregnancy Examination, Primorsky Krai Perinatal Center, 690042, Russia, Vladivostok, Mozhayskaya str., 1B, serebriakovanna@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-2627
Leyla E. Alieva, PhD Student, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia,
117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4, leylaalieva00@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3417-6721
Corresponding author: Maria D. Sidelnikova, m_sidelnikova@oparina4.ru

Similar Articles