Current possibilities of colposcopy in the complex diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

1. www.who.int.
2. Nayar R., Wilbur D., eds. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2015.
3. Сухих Г.Т., Прилепская В.Н., ред. Профилактика рака шейки матки. Руководство для врачей. 3-е изд. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2012: 38-49. [Sukhikh G.T., Prilepskaya V.N., ed. Prophylaxis of cervical cancer. A guide for doctors. 3rd ed. Мoscow: MEDpress-inform; 2012: 38-49. (in Russian)]
4. Shiraz A., Majmudar T. Colposcopy and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Med. 2017; 27(6): 177-83.
5. Прилепская В.Н., Байрамова Г.Р., Коган Е.А., Чернова В.Ф., Окушко А.Н. Новые возможности ранней диагностики и профилактики ВПЧ-ассоциированных поражений шейки матки. Медицинский совет. 2015; ХХ: 72-7. [Prilepskaya V.N., Bayramova G.R., Kogan E.A., Chernova V.F., Okushko A.N. New features of HPV-associated cervical lesions early diagnosis and prevention. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2015; XX: 72-7.]
6. Гудзь О.В., Камилова И.К., Миклин О.П. ВПЧ-инфекция шейки матки: перспективы комплексного лечения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2016; 16(2): 99-103. [Gudz O.V., Kamilova I.K., Miklin O.P. HPV infection of the cervix: prospects for comprehensive treatment. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2016; 16(2): 99-103. (in Russian)]
7. Ding Z., Li Y., Chen A., Song M., Zhang Y. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pr worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 207: 32-6.
8. Апгар Б.С., Броцман Г.Л., Шпицер М. Клиническая кольпоскопия. Пер. с англ. М.: Практическая медицина; 2012: 106. [Apgar B.S., Brotzman G.L., Spitzer M. Colposcopy principles and practice: an integrated textbook and atlas. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.]
9. Louwers J.A., Zaal A., Kocken M., Berkhof J., Papagiannakis E., Snijders P.J. et al. The performance of Dynamic Spectral Imaging colposcopy depends on indication for referrals. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015; 139(3): 452-7.
10. Bornstein J., Bentley J., Bösze P., Girardi F., Haefner H., Menton M. et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(1): 166-72.
11. Louwers J.A., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W.A., Verheijen R.H.M. Digital colposcopy: ready for use? An overview of literature. BJOG. 2009; 116(2): 220-9.
12. Zaal A., Louwers J.A., Berkhof J., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W.A., Graziosi G.C. et al. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. BJOG. 2012; 119(5): 537-44.
13. Coronado P.J., Fasero M. Colposcopy combined with dynamic spectral imaging. A prospective clinical study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 196: 11-6.
14. Louwers J., Zaal A., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W., Graziosi G., Spruijt J. et al. Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG. 2011; 118(3): 309-18.
15. Soutter W.P., Diakomanolis E., Lyons D., Ghaem-Maghami S., Ajala T., Haidopoulos D. et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009; 15(5): 1814-20.
16. Livingston J., Papagiannakis E. How colposcopy misses invasive cervical cancer: a case report from the IMPROVE-COLPO study. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 2016: 5857370.
17. Coronado P.J., Fasero M. Correlating the accuracy of colposcopy with practitioner experience when diagnosing cervical pathology using the Dynamic Spectral Imaging System (DySIS). Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2014; 78(4): 224-9.
18. Louwers J.A., Zaal A., Kocken M., Papagiannakis E., Meijer C.J., Verheijen R.H. Women’s preferences of dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2015; 79(4): 239-43.
19. Wade R., Spackman E., Corbett M., Wailer S., Light K., Nair R. et al. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for examination of the uterine cervix – DySIS, LuViva, Advanced Cervical Scan and Niris Imaging System: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 2013; 17(8): 1-240, v-vi.
20. Leeson S. Advances in colposcopy: new technologies to challenge current practice. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 182: 140-5.
21. Mustafa R.A., Santesso N., Khatib R., Mustafa A.A., Wiercioch W., Kehar R. et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2016; 132(3): 259-65.

Received 12.07.2017

Accepted 22.09.2017