Experience of managing pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and its outcome in a patient with uterine leiomyoma and a history of uterine artery embolization

Ziganshin A.M., Dikke G.B., Yanbarisova A.R., Frolov A.L., Karimova A.U.

1) Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Ufa, Russia; 2) F.I. Inozemtsev Academy of Medical Education, St. Petersburg, Russia; 3) Republican Clinical Perinatal Centre, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russia; 4) "Family" Medical Centre LLC, Ufa, Russia

The average age of onset of uterine leiomyoma (UL) is currently 32 years, with an incidence of secondary infertility of 25-56%; this is frequently managed by in vitro fertilization (IVF). 
Case report: A 40-year-old patient with multiple UL accompanied by heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea and moderate anemia presented for a history of tuboperitoneal infertility lasting for 9 years. There were two childbirths (spontaneous vaginal delivery and caesarean section), missed miscarriage, left adnexectomy, myomectomy, dissection of intrauterine synechiae, two IVF attempts (one ended in a full-term delivery) in the patient’s history. Due to the severity of UL symptoms, uterine artery embolization (UAE) was performed. The volume of UL was reduced by 32%. The patient underwent IVF and fresh embryo transfer, but pregnancy did not occur; after that cryopreserved/thawed embryo transfer was performed. The patient became pregnant, the course of the pregnancy was unremarkable; there was a caesarean section and a live birth of a female fetus weighing 3500g, 7/8 Apgar score. The postoperative period proceeded without complications, and the child develops normally.
Conclusion: UAE for symptomatic UL and infertility in combination with oocyte/embryo cryopreservation and IVF may be a promising method for achieving pregnancy in women with a burdened medical history. 

Authors’ contributions: Ziganshin A.M., Frolov A.L. – developing the concept; Yanbarisova A.R., Karimova A.U. – collecting and processing the material; Yanbarisova A.R., Dikke G.B. – writing the text; Ziganshin A.M., Dikke G.B. – editing the article.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest and guarantee that the article is the original work of the authors.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship.
Ethical Approval: IVF in a patient who underwent uterine artery embolization was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Republican Clinical Perinatal Centre, Ufa.
Patient Consent for Publication: The patient signed informed consent for the publication of her data in anonymized form. 
For citation: Ziganshin A.M., Dikke G.B., Yanbarisova A.R., Frolov A.L., Karimova A.U. 
Experience of managing pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and its outcome in 
a patient with uterine leiomyoma and a history of uterine artery embolization.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (11): 229-234 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.275

Keywords

uterine leiomyoma
uterine artery embolization
myomectomy
in vitro fertilization
assisted reproductive technologies

References

  1. Cheng L.C., Li H.Y., Gong Q.Q., Huang C.Y., Zhang C., Yan J.Z. Global, regional, and national burden of uterine fibroids in the last 30 years: Estimates from the 1990 to 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 1003605. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1003605.
  2. Giuliani E., As-Sanie S., Marsh E.E. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2020; 149(1): 3-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13102.
  3. Borah B.J., Yao X., Laughlin-Tommaso S.K., Heien H.C., Stewart E.A. Comparative effectiveness of uterine leiomyoma procedures using a large insurance claims database. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 130(5): 1047-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002331.
  4. Аганезова Н.В., Аганезов С.С., Шило М.М. Миома матки: современные практические аспекты заболевания. Проблемы репродукции. 2022; 28(4): 97-105. [Aganezova N.V., Aganezov S.S., Shilo M.M. Uterine fibroids: modern practical aspects of the disease. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022; 28(4): 97-105. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro20222804197.
  5. Li H., Hu Z., Fan Y., Hao Y. The influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes in pregnant women: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1): 345. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06545-5.
  6. Don E.E., Mijatovic V., van Eekelen R., Huirne J.A.F. The effect of myomectomy on reproductive outcomes in patients with uterine fibroids: A retrospective cohort study. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2022; 45(5): 970-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.025.
  7. Peng J., Wang J., Shu Q., Luo Y., Wang S., Liu Z. Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in uterine artery embolization vs myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Sci. Rep. 2024; 14: 19252. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69754-0.
  8. Bonduki C.E., Feldner P.C. Jr., Silva Jd., Castro R.A., Sartori M.G., Girão M.J. Pregnancy after uterine arterial embolization. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011; 66(5): 807-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322011000500016.
  9. Савельева Г.М., Бреусенко В.Г., Капранов С.А., Краснова И.А., Шиповский В.Н., Бобров Б.Ю., Арютин Д.Г., Аксенова В.Б., Ваганов Е.Ф. Эмболизации маточных артерий в лечении миомы матки. Современное состояние вопроса. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2010; 59(2): 81-7. [Saveljeva G.M., Breusenko V.G., Kapranov S.A., Krasnova I.A.,Shipovskiy V.N., Bobrov B.U., Aryutin D.G., Aksenova V.B., Vaganov E.F. Uterine arteries embolization in treatment of fibroids. Current state of the problem. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2010; 59(2): 81-7(in Russian)].
  10. Serres-Cousine O., Kuijper F.M., Curis E., Atashroo D. Clinical investigation of fertility after uterine artery embolization. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 225(4): 403.e1-403.e22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.033.
  11. Савельева Г.М., Краснова И.А., Бреусенко В.Г., Капранов С.А., Аксенова В.Б., Арютин Д.Г., Краснова А.С., Есипова И.А. Эффективность и профилактика возможных осложнений ЭМА при лечении миомы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014; 11: 74-9. [Savelyeva G.M., Krasnova I.A., Breusenko V.G., Kapranov S.A., Aksenova V.B., Aryutin D.G., Krasnova A.S., Esipova I.A. The efficiency of EMA and prevention of its possible complications in the treatment of myoma. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; (11): 74-9 (in Russian)].
  12. Калмыков Е.Л., Рахимов Ф.Р., Умарзода С.Г., Баратов А.К. Эмболизация маточных артерий при лейомиоме матки: состояние проблемы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 9:18-26. [Kalmykov E.L.,Rakhimov F.R., Umarzoda S.G., Baratov A.K. Uterine artery embolization for uterine leiomyoma: the state of the problem. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (9): 18-26 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.9.18-26.
  13. Калинина Н.А., Сулима А.Н., Румянцева З.С., Баскаков П.Н., Калинин В.Д. Оценка влияния эмболизации маточных артерий на репродуктивную функцию. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2023; 17(4): 476-84. [Kalinina N.A., Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S., Baskakov P.N., Kalinin V.D. Impact assessment of uterine artery embolization on reproductive. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17(4): 476-84 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.410.
  14. Ludwig P.E., Huff T.J., Shanahan M.M., Stavas J.M. Pregnancy success and outcomes after uterine fibroid embolization: updated review of published literature. Br. J. Radiol. 2020; 93(1105): 20190551. https://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190551.
  15. SART Clinic Summary Report. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART); 2018. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/
  16. Bashiri A., Halper K.I., Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018; 16(1): 121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2.
  17. Yang A.M., Xu X., Han Y., Wei J.J., Hao G.M., Cui N. et al. Risk factors for different types of pregnancy losses: analysis of 15,210 pregnancies after embryo transfer. Front. Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 683236. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.683236.
  18. Гришин И.И., Рощина В.А., Каусева О.И., Доброхотова Ю.Э. Эмболизация маточных артерий в лечении миомы матки: актуальный подход в современных реалиях. РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2018; 1(2): 169-72.[Grishin I.I., Roshchina V.A., Kauseva O.I., Dobrokhotova Yu.E. Uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a relevant approach in modern realities. RMJ. Mother and Child. 2018; 1(2): 169-72 (in Russian)].https://dx.doi.org/10.32364/2618-8430-2018-1-2-169-172.
  19. El Shamy T., Amer S.A.K., Mohamed A.A., James C., Jayaprakasan K. The impact of uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020; 99(1): 16-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13698.
  20. Mandourah S., Badeghiesh A., Baghlaf H., Dahan M.H. How does the need for IVF affect pregnancy complications among multiple gestations? The study of a large American population database including almost 100,000 multiple gestations. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol X. 2023; 21:100270. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100270.
  21. Chill H.H., Karavani G., Rachmani T., Dior U., Tadmor O., Shushan A. Growth pattern of uterine leiomyoma along pregnancy. BMC Womens Health. 2019; 19(1): 100. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0803-6.
  22. Зиганшин А.М., Кулавский В.А., Латыпова Р.Р. Случай успешной консервативной миомэктомии больших размеров во время беременности. Практическая медицина. 2017; 7(108): 170-2. [Ziganshin A.M., Kulavsky V.A., Latypova R.R. The case of successful conservative large-size myomectomy during pregnancy. Practical Medicine. 2017; 7(108): 170-2(in Russian)].
  23. Yan X., Zhou L., He G., Liu X. Pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2023; 10: 1283279. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1283279.

Received 31.10.2024

Accepted 13.11.2024

About the Authors

Aidar M. Ziganshin, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2, Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia,
450008, Russia, Ufa, Lenin str., 3, Zigaidar@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5474-1080
Galina B. Dikke, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course in Reproductive Medicine, F.I. Inozemtsev Academy of Medical Education, 190013, Russia, St. Petersburg, Moskovsky Ave., 22, letter M, galadikke@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-8962
Aliya R. Yanbarisova, Resident at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2, Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, 450008, Russia, Ufa, Lenin str., 3, yanbarisova1999@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-4080
Alexey L. Frolov, PhD, Honored Physician of the Russian Federation, Head of the Operating Department No. 2, Republican Clinical Perinatal Center, Ministry of Health
of the Republic of Bashkortostan, 450106, Russia, Ufa, Batyrskaya str., 41, frolrpc@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0678-1503
Aliya U. Karimova, Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Reproductologist, Oncologist, "Family" Medical Center, 450054, Russia, Ufa, Prospekt Oktyabrya str., 73, build. 1,
k-aliya@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-5881
Corresponding author: Aliya R. Yanbarisova, yanbarisova1999@mail.ru

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.