About
The Journal "Obstetrics and Gynecology"Journal HistoryAims and ScopePolicies on Conflict of Interest, Human and Animal Rights, and Informed ConsentEditorial ProcessData sharing statementAdvertising PolicyThe Process for Handling Cases Requiring Corrections, Retractions, and Editorial Expressions of ConcernEditorial BoardEditorial CounsilInformation for ProfessionalsNewsContacts
ArchiveEthical StandardsSubscription
For authors
InstructionsInformed consent policyContract offerEASE GuidelinesICJME CriteriaWAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications
Reviewing
Procedure for reviewingReviewers 2023-2024
About
The Journal "Obstetrics and Gynecology"Journal HistoryAims and ScopePolicies on Conflict of Interest, Human and Animal Rights, and Informed ConsentEditorial ProcessData sharing statementAdvertising PolicyThe Process for Handling Cases Requiring Corrections, Retractions, and Editorial Expressions of ConcernEditorial BoardEditorial CounsilInformation for ProfessionalsNewsContacts
ArchiveEthical StandardsSubscription
For authors
InstructionsInformed consent policyContract offerEASE GuidelinesICJME CriteriaWAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications
Reviewing
Procedure for reviewingReviewers 2023-2024
Logout
Obstetrics and Gynegology2024№8
Critical analysis of the current...

Critical analysis of the current data on the normal endometrial microbiome

DOI
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.130

Baranouskaya A.I., Voronetsky A.N.

Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Republic of Belarus

A search of literature sources was carried out in the PabMed/MedLine, eLibrary databases for the period 2019–2024 and a review of the endometrial microbiota in women of reproductive age without uterine pathology was conducted. Single studies of the uterine microbiome in healthy women were found. The endometrium is supposed to contain a very low microbial mass, which prevents microorganisms from being cultivated. Currently, next generation sequencing is widely used to evaluate the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence, that is justified by the universality of bacteria research method. However, 16S rRNA sequencing has significant limitations: firstly, the method is not applicable to viruses and fungi; secondly, the results are calculated using special algorithms, and the unit of measurement is an operational taxonomic unit, more often corresponding to the genus and not necessarily identical to the cultivated microorganism. The data on the presence and composition of the endometrial microbiota of the normal uterus are contradictory. This may be due to the lack of a single universal approach to diagnosis and there is no method for obtaining endometrial samples without contamination. Metatranscriptomic analysis of the endometrium in healthy women showed the presence of metabolically active microorganisms in normal endometrium in very low numbers without dominance of Lactobacillus.
Conclusion: Scientific findings on the microbiome of the normal endometrium continue to accumulate. There is still an unproven association of the presence and relative abundance of Lactobacillus in the endometrium with the rate of clinical pregnancy and live birth, including those after the use of assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors’ contributions: Baranouskaya A.I., Voronetsky A.N. – developing the concept and design of the study, collecting and processing the material, editing the article; Baranouskaya A.I. – writing the text.
Conflicts of interest: Authors declare lack of the possible conflicts of interests.
Funding: The study was carried out without sponsorship.
For citation: Baranouskaya A.I., Voronetsky A.N. 
Critical analysis of the current data on the normal endometrial microbiome.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (8): 24-30 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.130

Keywords

uterus
endometrium
Lactobacillus
microbiota
microbiome
sequencing
Full text (in Russian)

References

  1. Yang X., Pan X., Li M., Zeng Z., Guo Y., Chen P. et al. Interaction between cervical microbiota and host gene regulation in caesarean section scar diverticulum. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022; 10(4): e0167622. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01676-22.
  2. Ersahin S., Ersahin A., Gungor N.D., Gungor K., Yalçın D., Ersahin C. et al. High serum AMH inhibits pathological growth of the low biomass endometrial microbiome. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022; 26(20): 7600-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202210_30035.
  3. Fujii S., Oguchi T. Age- and endometrial microbiota-related delay in development of endometrial receptivity. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2023; 22(1): e12523. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12523.
  4. Табеева Г.И., Думановская М.Р., Чернуха Г.Е., Припутневич Т.В. Современные представления о микробиоте в гинекологии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 2: 38-44. [Tabeeva G.I., Dumanovskaya M.R., Chernukha G.E., Priputnevich T.V. Modern ideas about the microbiota in gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (2): 38-44. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.2.38-44.
  5. Reschini M., Benaglia L., Ceriotti F., Borroni R., Ferrari S., Castiglioni M. et al. Endometrial microbiome: sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation. Sci. Rep. 2022; 12(1): 8467. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12095-7.
  6. Bednarska-Czerwińska A., Morawiec E., Zmarzły N., Szapski M., Jendrysek J., Pecyna A. et al. Dynamics of microbiome changes in the endometrium and uterine cervix during embryo implantation: a comparative analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2023; 29: e941289. https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941289.
  7. Canha-Gouveia A., Pérez-Prieto I., Rodríguez C.M., Escamez T., Leonés-Baños I., Salas-Espejo E. et al. The female upper reproductive tract harbors endogenous microbial profiles. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1096050. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3389/fendo.2023.1096050.
  8. Kaluanga Bwanga P., Tremblay-Lemoine P.L., Timmermans M., Ravet S., Munaut C., Nisolle M. et al. The endometrial microbiota: challenges and prospects. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(9): 1540. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091540.
  9. Lin Q., Duan H., Wang S., Guo Z., Wang S., Chang Y. et al. Endometrial microbiota in women with and without adenomyosis: a pilot study. Front. Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1075900. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1075900.
  10. Vanstokstraeten R., Callewaert E., Blotwijk S., Rombauts E., Crombé F., Emmerechts K. et al. Comparing vaginal and endometrial microbiota using culturomics: proof of concept. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023; 24(6): 5947. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijms24065947.
  11. Winters A.D., Romero R., Gervasi M.T., Gomez-Lopez N., Tran M.R., Garcia-Flores V. et al. Does the endometrial cavity have a molecular microbial signature? Sci. Rep. 2019; 9(1): 9905. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46173-0.
  12. Sola-Leyva A., Andrés-León E., Molina N.M., Terron-Camero L.C., Plaza-Díaz J., Sáez-Lara M.J. et al. Mapping the entire functionally active endometrial microbiota. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(4): 1021-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa372.
  13. Liu Y., Ko E.Y., Wong K.K., Chen X., Cheung W.C., Law T.S. et al. Endometrial microbiota in infertile women with and without chronic endometritis as diagnosed using a quantitative and reference range-based method. Fertil. Steril. 2019; 112(4): 707-717.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.015.
  14. Адамян Л.В., Припутневич Т.В., Григорян И.Э., Гаврилова Т.Ю., Саркисян Р.М., Антонова А.А. Современные представления о микробиоте эндометрия. Проблемы репродукции. 2022; 28(6): 159 63. [Adamyan L.V., Priputnevich T.V., Grigoryan I.E., Gavrilova T.Yu., Sarkisyan R.M., Antonova A.A. Modern concepts of endometrial microbiota. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022; 28(6): 159 63. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro202228061159.
  15. Molina N.M., Sola-Leyva A., Haahr T., Aghajanova L., Laudanski P., Castilla J.A. et al. Analysing endometrial microbiome: methodological considerations and recommendations for good practice. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(4): 859-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab009.
  16. Lladó Fernández S., Větrovský T., Baldrian P. The concept of operational taxonomic units revisited: genomes of bacteria that are regarded as closely related are often highly dissimilar. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 2019; 64(1): 19-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12223-018-0627-y.
  17. Azkargorta M., Bregón-Villahoz M., Escobes I., Ibáñez-Pérez J., Iloro I., Iglesias M. et al. In-depth proteomics and natural peptidomics analyses reveal antibacterial peptides in human endometrial fluid. J. Proteomics. 2020; 216: 103652. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103652.
  18. Чеботарь И.В., Поликарпова С.В., Бочарова Ю.А., Маянский Н.А. Использование времяпролетной масс-спектрометрии с матрично-активированной лазерной десорбцией/ионизацией (MALDI-TОF MS) для идентификации бактериальных и грибковых возбудителей III-IV групп патогенности. Лабораторная служба. 2018; 7(2): 78-86. [Chebotar' I.V., Polikarpova S.V., Bocharova Yu.A., Mayanskii N.A. Use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for identification of bacteria and fungi of the pathogenicity group III and IV. Laboratory Service. 2018; 7(2): 78-86. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/labs20187278-86.
  19. Nowrotek M., Jałowiecki Ł., Harnisz M., Płaza G.A. Culturomics and metagenomics: in understanding of environmental resistome. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019; 13(3): 40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1121-8.
  20. Kitaya K., Tanaka S.E., Sakuraba Y., Ishikawa T. Multi-drug-resistant chronic endometritis in infertile women with repeated implantation failure: trend over the decade and pilot study for third-line oral antibiotic treatment. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2022; 39(8): 1839-48. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02528-7.
  21. Lüll K., Saare M., Peters M., Kakhiani E., Zhdanova A., Salumets A. et al. Differences in microbial profile of endometrial fluid and tissue samples in women with in vitro fertilization failure are driven by Lactobacillus abundance. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2022; 101(2): 212-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14297.
  22. Wang J., Li Z., Ma X., Du L., Jia Z., Cui X. et al. Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12(1): 4191. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24516-8.
  23. Chen W., Wei K., He X., Wei J., Yang L., Li L. et al. Identification of uterine microbiota in infertile women receiving in vitro fertilization with and without chronic endometritis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021; 9: 693267. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.693267.
  24. Moreno I., Garcia-Grau I., Perez-Villaroya D., Gonzalez-Monfort M., Bahçeci M., Barrionuevo M.J. et al. Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients. Microbiome. 2022; 10(1): 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01184-w.
  25. Carosso A., Revelli A., Gennarelli G., Canosa S., Cosma S., Borella F. et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation and progesterone supplementation affect vaginal and endometrial microbiota in IVF cycles: a pilot study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020; 37(9): 2315-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01878-4.
  26. Баринова В.В., Кузнецова Н.Б., Буштырева И.О., Оксенюк О.С., Дудурич В.В., Шаталов А.Е. Микробиом эндометрия при многократных неудачах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий и у здоровых женщин: где норма и где патология? Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 6: 105-14. [Barinova V.V., Kuznetsova N.B., Bushtyreva I.O. Oksenyuk O.S., Dudurich V.V., Shatalov A.E. Endometrial microbiome in women with and without a history of repeated failures of assisted reproductive technology: what are norm and pathology? Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (6): 105-14. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.6.105-114.
  27. Shiroda M., Manning S.D. Lactobacillus strains vary in their ability tointeract with human endometrial stromal cells. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9): e0238993. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238993.
  28. Боярский К.Ю., Кахиани Е.И. Микробиом репродуктивной системы человека. Проблемы репродукции. 2019; 25(4): 27-34. [Boyarskiĭ K.Yu., Kakhiani E.I. Microbiome of the human reproductive system. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2019; 25(4): 27-34. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro20192504127.
  29. Кебурия Л.К., Смольникова В.Ю., Припутневич Т.В., Муравьева В.В. Микробиота полости матки и ее влияние на репродуктивные исходы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 2: 22-7. [Keburiya L.K., Smol’nikova V.Yu., Priputnevich T.V., Murav’eva V.V. Uterine microbiota and its effect on reproductive outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (2): 22-7. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.2.22-27.
  30. Исламиди Д.К., Белых Н.С., Ковалев В.В., Миляева Н.М. Вклад микробиоты полости матки в развитие патологических процессов эндометрия. Уральский медицинский журнал. 2023; 22(1): 96-103. [Islamidi D.K., Belykh N.S., Kovalev V.V., Milyaeva N.M. Contribution of the uterine cavity microbiota to the development of pathological endometrial processes. Ural Medical Journal. 2023; 22(1): 96-103. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-1-96-103.
  31. Турсунова Н.Б., Лебедева О.П., Алтухова О.Б., Нагорный А.В. Современный взгляд на роль микробиома женского репродуктивного тракта в исходах ЭКО. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2023; 17(4): 512-25. [Tursunova N.B., Lebedeva O.P., Altukhova O.B., Nagornyi A.V. An updated view on the role of the female reproductive tract microbiome in IVF outcomes. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17(4): 512-25. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.433.
  32. Diaz-Martínez M.D.C., Bernabeu A., Lledó B., Carratalá-Munuera C., Quesada J.A., Lozano F.M. et al. Impact of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome pattern on assisted reproduction outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(18): 4063. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184063.

Received 30.05.2024

Accepted 03.07.2024

About the Authors

Alena I. Baranouskaya, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Belarusian State Medical University,
220083, Dzerzhinsky Ave., 83, Minsk, Belarus, elena_baranovska@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2116-4675
Aliaksandr N. Voronetsky, PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Belarusian State Medical University,
220083, Dzerzhinsky Ave., 83, Minsk, Belarus, anvoron@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-376X
Corresponding author: Alena I. Baranouskaya, elena_baranovska@mail.ru

Similar Articles

№3 / 2020
Onopriychuk A.R., Kapustin R.V., Arzhanova O.N.
The role of gut microbiota in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus
№11 / 2024
Tabeeva G.I., Elovenko A.A., Dumanovskaya M.R., Asaturova A.V., Kuzemin A.A.
Modern aspects of pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic endometritis
№5 / 2020
Andreeva E.N., Sheremetyeva E.V., Grigoryan O.R., Mikheev R.K., Absatarova R.K.
The endometrium as a target organ in postmenopausal women
№5 / 2024
Yarmolinskaya M.I., Koloshkina А.V.
Tissue-selective estrogen regulation capabilities in postmenopausal women
№11 / 2023
Vanakova A.I., Dolgushina N.V., Priputnevich T.V.
The role of the uterine microbiota in the genesis of endometrial polyps
By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.