Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: new about an old problem

Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Syrkashev E.M., Kostyukov K.V., Shmakov R.G.

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is a complex multifactorial disease; the prediction of its outcomes remains an unresolved problem. SCT complicates not only the postnatal period, but also the antenatal one: there is compression of adjacent organs, tumor rupture, tumor hemorrhage, heart failure, nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), and antepartum fetal death. A literature analysis could identify the factors of an adverse outcome in fetal SCT; when they are detected, fetal surgery is used worldwide. The goal of intrauterine surgery is to reduce/stop blood supply to the tumor and to resect or completely remove the latter in order to improve perinatal outcomes.
Early detection of fetal malformations, widespread clinical introduction and use of the known factors of an adverse outcome will be able to make a timely decision on the possibility and expediency of prolonging pregnancy; but in some cases to significantly affect perinatal outcomes while timely using fetal surgical interventions. Fetal surgery for high-risk SCT certainly improves perinatal outcomes; however, there is today no consensus on the indications for surgery, procedures, and timing of implementation, which requires further investigations.
Conclusion: When there is a preponderance of a cystic component having a low vascularity, the prognosis of SCT is considered relatively favorable. When there is solid SCT with an abundant vascularity, there are high risks for heart failure and NIHF, resulting in an adverse outcome. Therefore, these cases need active tactics: follow-up, intrauterine surgical interventions done as clinically indicated, as well as timely delivery.

Authors’ contributions: Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Syrkashev E.M., Kostyukov K.V., Shmakov R.G. – review of publications on the topic of the article, analysis of the findings, writing the article.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no possible conflicts of interest.
Funding: The investigation has not been sponsored.
For citation: Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Syrkashev E.M., Kostyukov K.V., Shmakov R.G. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: new about an old problem.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (2): 12-17 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.267

Keywords

fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma
fetal surgery
open fetal surgery
nonimmune hydrops fetalis
fetal malformation

References

  1. Pauniaho S.L., Heikinheimo O., Vettenranta K., Salonen J., Stefanovic V., Ritvanen A. et al. High prevalence of sacrococcygeal teratoma in Finland - a nationwide population-based study. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102(6): e251-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12211.
  2. Hambraeus M., Arnbjörnsson E., Börjesson A., Salvesen K., Hagander L. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: A population-based study of incidence and prenatal prognostic factors. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016; 51(3): 481-5.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.09.007.
  3. Altman R.P., Randolph J.G., Lilly J.R. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey-1973. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1974; 9(3): 389-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(74)80297-6.
  4. Flake A.W. Fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 1993; 2(2): 113-20.
  5. Кадырбердиева Ф.З., Шмаков Р.Г., Бокерия Е.Л., Тетруашвили Н.К., Костюков К.В., Донников А.Е., Белоусов Д.М. Неиммунная водянка плода: основные причины. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 11: 186-91. [Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Shmakov R.G., Bockeria E.L., Tetruashvili N.K., Kostyukov K.V., Donnikov A.E., Belousov D.M. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis: main causes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (11): 186-91. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.11.186-191.
  6. Adzick N.S. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15(1): 1-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2009.05.003.
  7. Baumgarten H.D., Gebb J.S., Khalek N., Moldenhauer J.S., Johnson M.P., Peranteau W.H. et al. Preemptive delivery and immediate resection for fetuses with high-risk sacrococcygeal teratomas. Fetal Ddiagn. Ther. 2019; 45(3):137-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000487542.
  8. Westerburg B., Feldstein V.A., Sandberg P.L., Lopoo J.B., Harrison M.R., Albanese C.T. Sonographic prognostic factors in fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2000; 35(2): 322-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(00)90032-0.
  9. Billmire D.F., Grosfeld J.L. Teratomas in childhood: analysis of 142 cases. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1986; 21(6): 548-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80231-7.
  10. Кадырбердиева Ф.З., Шмаков Р.Г., Бокерия Е.Л. Неиммунная водянка плода: современные принципы диагностики и лечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 10: 28-34. [Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Shmakov R.G., Bokeria E.L. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis: modern principles of diagnosis and treatment. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (10): 28-34. (in Russian)].https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.10.28-34.
  11. Hedrick H.L., Flake A.W., Crombleholme T.M., Howell L.J., Johnson M.P., Wilson R.D., Adzick N.S. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal assessment, fetal intervention, and outcome. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004; 39(3): 430-8.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.005.
  12. Akinkuotu A.C., Coleman A., Shue E., Sheikh F., Hirose S., Lim F.Y.,Olutoye O.O. Predictors of poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosedsacrococcygeal teratoma: A multiinstitutional review. J. Pediatr. Surg.2015; 50(5): 771-4. https://dx.doi.org/1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.034.
  13. Kleijer W.J., van der Sterre M.L.T., Garritsen V.H., Raams A., Jaspers N.G.J. Evolution of prenatal detection of neural tube defects in the pregnant population of the city of Barcelona from 1992 to 2006. Prenat. Diagn. 2011; 31(10): 1184-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.2863.
  14. Danzer E., Hubbard A.M., Hedrick H.L., Johnson M.P., Wilson R.D., Howell L.J. et al. Diagnosis and characterization of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma with prenatal MRI. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006; 187(4): 350-6.https://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0152.
  15. Arisoy R., Erdogdu E., Kumru P., Demirci O., Ergin N., Pekin O. et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcomes of fetal teratomas. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2016; 44(2):118-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22310.
  16. Usui N., Kitano Y., Sago H., Kanamori Y., Yoneda A., Nakamura T. et al. Outcomes of prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: the results of a Japanese nationwide survey. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012; 47(3): 441-7.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.08.020.
  17. Benachi A., Durin L., Vasseur Maurer S., Aubry M.C., Parat S., Herlicoviez M. et al. Prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a prognostic classification. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2006; 41(9): 1517-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.009.
  18. Shue E., Bolouri M., Jelin E..B, Vu L., Bratton B., Cedars E. et al. Tumor metrics and morphology predict poor prognosis in prenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratoma: a 25-year experience at a single institution. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013; 48(6): 1225-31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.016.
  19. Rodriguez M.A., Cass D.L., Lazar D.A., Cassady C.I., Moise K.J., Johnson A. et al. Tumor volume to fetal weight ratio as an early prognostic classification for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2011; 46(6): 1182-5.https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.051.
  20. Gebb J.S., Khalek N., Qamar H., Johnson M.P., Oliver E.R., Coleman B.G. et al. High tumor volume to fetal weight ratio is associated with worse fetal outcomes and increased maternal risk in fetuses with sacrococcygeal teratoma. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2019; 45(2): 94-101. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000486782.
  21. Sy E.D., Filly R.A., Cheong M.L., Clifton M.S., Cortes R.A., Ohashi S. et al. Prognostic role of tumor-head volume ratio in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2009; 26(2): 75-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000238113.
  22. Van Mieghem T., Al-Ibrahim A., Deprest J., Lewi L., Langer J.C., Baud D. et al. Minimally invasive therapy for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma: case series and systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 43(6): 611-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.13315.
  23. Adzick N.S., Crombleholme T.M., Morgan M.A., Quinn T.M. A rapidly growing fetal teratoma. Lancet. 1997; 349(9051): 538. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)80088-8.
  24. Peiró J.L., Sbragia L., Scorletti F., Lim F.Y., Shaaban A. Management of fetal teratomas. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2016; 32(7): 635-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3892-3.
  25. Sananes N., Javadian P., Schwach Werneck Britto I., Meyer N., Koch A., Gaudineau A. et al. Technical aspects and effectiveness of percutaneous fetal therapies for large sacrococcygeal teratomas: cohort study and literature review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 47(6): 712-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.14935.
  26. Zamora I.J., Ethun C.G., Evans L.M., Olutoye O.O., Ivey R.T., Haeri S.et al. Maternal morbidity and reproductive outcomes related to fetal surgery. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013; 48(5): 951-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.010.
  27. Mari G. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity. J. Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24(5): 697-702. https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.5.697.
  28. Mari G., Stone J., Berghella V., Sciscione A.C., Tate D., Schenone M.H. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Clinical Guideline #8: the fetus at risk for anemia--diagnosis and management. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 212(6): 697-710. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.059.
  29. den Otter S.C.M., de Mol A.C., Eggink A.J., van Heijst A.F.J., de Bruijn D., Wijnen R.M.H. Major sacrococcygeal teratoma in an extreme premature infant: a multidisciplinary approach. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2008; 23(1): 41-5.https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000109225.
  30. Holcroft C.J., Blakemore K.J., Gurewitsch E.D., Driggers R.W., Northington F.J., Fischer A.C. Large fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas: could early delivery improve outcome? Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2008; 24(1): 55-60.https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000132408.
  31. Lee M.Y., Won H.S., Hyun M.K., Lee H.Y., Shim J.Y., Lee P.R., Kim A. Perinatal outcome of sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat. Diagn. 2011; 31(13): 1217-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.2865.
  32. Ibele A., Flake A., Shaaban A. Survival of a profoundly hydropic fetus with a sacrococcygeal teratoma delivered at 27 weeks of gestation for maternal mirror syndrome J. Pediatr. Surg. 2008; 43(8): e17-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.010.
  33. Roybal J.L., Moldenhauer J.S., Khalek N., Bebbington M.W.., Johnson M.P.,Hedrick H.L. et al. Early delivery as an alternative management strategy for selected high-risk fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2011; 46(7): 1325-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jpedsurg.2010.10.020.

Received 14.11.2022

Accepted 18.01.2023

About the Authors

Faina Z. Kadyrberdieva, PhD, obstetrician-gynecologist, Academician V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia, +7(909)916-58-52,
f_kadyrberdieva@oparina4.ru, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4.
Egor M. Syrkashev, PhD, Researcher at the Radiology Department, Academician V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia, e_syrkashev@oparina4.ru, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4.
Kirill V. Kostyukov, Dr. Med. Sci., Head of the Department of the Functional Diagnosis, Academician V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia,
+7(495)438-25-29, k_kostyukov@oparina4.ru, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4.
Roman G. Shmakov, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor of the RAS, Director of the Institute of Obstetrics, Academician V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P, Ministry of Health of Russia, +7(495)438-72-00, r_shmakov@oparina4.ru, 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str., 4.

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.