Conservative treatment of pelvic hematoma after sacrospinous fixation

Yarin G.Yu., Vilgelmi I.A., Fedorenko V.N., Alekseeva A.V.

1Ya.L. Tsivyan Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russia, Novosibirsk 630091, Frunze str. 17, Russia 2Innovative Medical Technology Center “Clinic of NRITO”, Novosibirsk 630091, Frunze str. 19a, Russia 3Center for Urology and Gynecology, JSC Innovative Medical Technology Center (Medical Technopark), Novosibirsk 630091, Frunze str. 19a, Russia
Background. Pelvic organ prolapse is a common disease in women worldwide. Sacrospinous fixation is one of the most effective surgical treatments for genital prolapse. The frequency of postoperative hemorrhagic complications after this treatment is 0.2-2.2% and they mostly manifest themselves by retroperitoneal hematoma formation. The choice of a treatment for these complications depends on the size of hematoma, the clinical presentations of compression of the adjacent organs, the severity of hemorrhagic and pain syndromes, and the appearance of signs of hematoma infection.
Description. The paper describes a clinical case of conservative treatment for retroperitoneal hematoma developed in a female patient on the second day after sacrospinous cervicopexy.
Discussion. The lack of clear recommendations and evidence-based studies on this problem requires further investigations, elaboration of diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic protocols for postoperative retroperitoneal hematomas.

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse
sacrospinous fixation
postoperative hemorrhagic complications
retroperitoneal hematoma

Supplementary Materials

  1. Fig. 1. CT: pelvic hematoma (2d day after operation). Bladder is pushed to the right.
  2. Fig. 2. CT (vascular program): the iliac arteries are symmetrical, not damaged. Large venous trunks of don’t have visible lesions.

References

1. Fialkow M.F., Newton K.M., Lentz G.M., Weiss N.S. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19(3): 437-40.

2. Nacheva A., Kovachev S., Markov V., Spasov P., Vasilev N., Kostov I. Richter’s sacrospinous ligament fixation and its place in current gynecology. Akush. Ginekol. (Sofiia). 2014; 53(2): 21-4.

3. Dos Reis Brandão da Silveira S., Haddad J.M., de Jármy-Di Bella Z.I., Nastri F., Kawabata M.G., da Silva Carramão S. et al. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2015; 26(3): 335-42.

4. Petri E., Ashok K. Sacrospinous vaginal fixation – current status. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2011; 90(5): 429-36.

5. Yazdany T., Wong K., Bhatia N.N. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse in the era of vaginal mesh kits. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 23(5): 391-5.

6. Aksakal O., Doğanay M., Onur Topçu H., Kokanali K., Erkilinç S., Cavkaytar S. Long-term surgical outcomes of vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Minerva Chir. 2014; 69(4): 239-44.

7. Estrade J.P., Agostini A., Roger V., Dallay D., Blanc B., Cravello L. Sacrospinous colpopexy complications. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2004; 32(10): 850-4.

8. Azaïs H., Bassil A., Giraudet G., Rubod C., Lucot J.P., Cosson M. How to manage peroperative haemorrhage when vaginally treating genital prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 178: 203-7.

9. Liao C.Y., Ding D.C. Different management strategies for postoperative hematoma after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 51(4): 656-9.

10. Chan Y.C., Morales J.P., Reidy J.F., Taylor P.R. Management of spontaneous and iatrogenic retroperitoneal haemorrhage: conservative management, endovascular intervention or open surgery? Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2008; 62(10): 1604-13.

11. Pahwa A.K., Arya L.A., Andy U.U. Management of arterial and venous hemorrhage during sacrospinous ligament fixation: cases and review of the literature. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(3): 387-91.

Received 07.12.2016

Accepted 23.12.2016

About the Authors

Yarin G.Y., Ph.D., leading researcher, Head of the Functional Group of Neurourology, Ya.L. Tsivyan Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ministry of Health of Russia; Head of the surgical department, Innovative Medical Technology Center “Clinic of NRITO”; head of the functional center of urology and gynecology, Center for Urology and Gynecology, JSC Innovative Medical Technology Center (Medical Technopark). 630091, Russia, Novosibirsk, Frunze str. 17. Tel.: +73833633131. E-mail: yaringennadiy@icloud.com
Vilgelmi Inna Alexandrovna, gynecologist, Innovative Medical Technology Center “Clinic of NRITO”; obstetrician-gynecologist, Center for Urology and Gynecology, JSC Innovative Medical Technology Center (Medical Technopark). 630091, Russia, Novosibirsk, Frunze str. 19a. Tel.: +79139012753. Email: vilgelmi@ngs.ru
Alexeeva Anastasia Vladimirovna, urologist, Innovative Medical Technology Center “Clinic of NRITO”; urologist, Center for Urology and Gynecology, JSC Innovative Medical Technology Center (Medical Technopark). 630091, Russia, Novosibirsk, Frunze str. 19a

For citations: Yarin G.Yu., Vilgelmi I.A., Fedorenko V.N., Alekseeva A.V. Conservative treatment
of pelvic hematoma after sacrospinous fixation.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; (9): 144-7. (in Russian)
http://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.9.144-7

Similar Articles

By continuing to use our site, you consent to the processing of cookies that ensure the proper functioning of the site.