ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

Exploration of bacterial biofilm formation on mesh implants used in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Shalepo K.V., Khusnutdinova T.A., Budilovskaya O.V., Krysanova A.A., Rusina E.I., Tsypurdeeva A.A., Yarmolinskaya M.I., Savicheva A.M.

D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Russia

Objective. To explore in vitro bacterial biofilm formation on mesh implants used in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Materials and methods. The study used six fragments of medical mesh implants: polypropylene meshes Reperen, Russia (KS1), Gynemesh PS, USA (KS2), and titanium mesh Titanium Silk, Russia (KS3). Clinical bacterial isolates were obtained from the vaginal biotope. Biofilm forming bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Candida albicans. Biofilm formation capacity was determined in polystyrene flat-bottom plates. After co-cultivation of bacterial isolates and mesh fragments for 24 and 48 hours, biofilm formation on the bottom of the plate well and on the mesh surface was determined in optical density (OD) units. 
Results. Bacterial biofilm formation did not occur on the surface of the investigated mesh implants within 24 or 48 hours. Optical density of the eluent during co-cultivation of polypropylene mesh and S. aureus was 0.174 and 0.179 after 24 and 48 hours, respectively, that was similar to OD of the negative control. Similar results were obtained for other investigated mesh implants.
Conclusion. Polypropylene and titanium mesh materials are highly resistant to microbial colonization and biofilm formation on their surfaces.

Authors' contributions. Shalepo K.V. – methodology, the study design and  coordination, manuscript writing and editing; Khusnutdinova T.A., Budilovskaya O.V., Krysanova A.A. – participation in manuscript writing and editing; Rusina E.I. – study coordination, participation in manuscript writing and editing; Tsypurdeeva A.A., Yarmolinskaya M.I. – manuscript editing, approval of the final manuscript version; Savicheva A.M. – the study concept and coordination, manuscript editing,  approval of the final manuscript version. The authors declare their authorship in compliance with the ICMJE criteria. The authors have made a significant contribution to the analytical search and preparation of the manuscript, read and approved the final version for publication.
Conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest to declare.
Funding. The study was conducted within the framework of Fundamental scientific research topic No. 1024032800068-4-3.2.2 “Development of treatment strategies aimed at active longevity of women”.
Ethical Approval. The study was approved by the Expert Commission of  D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology on January 13, 2026.
Authors' Data Sharing Statement. The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author after approval from the principal investigator.
For citation: Shalepo K.V., Khusnutdinova T.A., Budilovskaya O.V., Krysanova A.A., Rusina E.I., 
Tsypurdeeva A.A., Yarmolinskaya M.I., Savicheva A.M. Exploration of  bacterial biofilm formation
on  mesh implants used in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2026; (5): 99-106 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2026.17

Keywords

bacterial biofilms
vaginal microorganisms
mesh implant

References

  1. Deffieux X., Perrouin-Verbe M.A., Campagne-Loiseau S., Donon L., Levesque A., Rigaud J. et al. Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2024; 294(2): 170-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.015
  2. Donlan R.M., Costerton J.W. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002; 15(2): 167-93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.20023
  3. Yin W., Wang Y., Liu L., He J. Biofilms: the microbial "protective clothing" in extreme environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019; 20(14): 3423. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143423
  4. Hall C.W., Mah T.F. Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017; 41(3): 276-301. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux010
  5. Høiby N., Bjarnsholt T., Moser C., Bassi G.L., Coenye T., Donelli G. et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015; 21 Suppl 1: S1-S25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024
  6. Roman S., Mangir N., Bissoli J., Chapple C.R., MacNeil S. Biodegradable scaffolds designed to mimic fascia-like properties for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. J. Biomater. Appl. 2016; 30(10): 1578-88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885328216633373
  7. Wi Y.M., Patel R. Understanding biofilms and novel approaches to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of medical device-associated infections. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2018; 32(4): 915-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.009
  8. Francolini I., Donelli G. Prevention and control of biofilm-based medical-device-related infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2010; 59(3): 227-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00665.x
  9. Khatoon Z., McTiernan C.D., Suuronen E.J., Mah T.F., Alarcon E.I. Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon. 2018; 4(12): e01067. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01067
  10. Omwenga E.O., Awuor S.O. The bacterial biofilms: formation, impacts, and possible management targets in the healthcare system. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2024; 2024: 1542576. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/cjid/1542576
  11. Serrano-Aroca Á., Pous-Serrano S. Prosthetic meshes for hernia repair: state of art, classification, biomaterials, antimicrobial approaches, and fabrication methods. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2021; 109(12): 2695-719. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37238
  12. Calabrese G., Franco D., Petralia S., Monforte F., Condorelli G.G., Squarzoni S. et al. Dual-functional nano-functionalized titanium scaffolds to inhibit bacterial growth and enhance osteointegration. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11(10): 2634. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11102634
  13. Lin F.C., Gilleran J.P., Powell C.R., Atiemo H.O. To mesh or not mesh "apical prolapse," that is the question! Neurourol. Urodyn. 2024; 43(7): 1626-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nau.25469
  14. Mangir N., Roman S., Chapple C.R., MacNeil S. Complications related to use of mesh implants in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: infection or inflammation? World J. Urol. 2020; 38(1): 73-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02679-w
  15. Birolini C., Faro Junior M.P., Terhoch C.B., de Miranda J.S., Tanaka E.Y., Utiyama E.M. Microbiology of chronic mesh infection. Hernia. 2023; 27(4): 1017-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02747-6
  16. Cevasco M., Itani K.M. Ventral hernia repair with synthetic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile. Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2012; 13(4): 209-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2012.123
  17. Kao A.M., Arnold M.R., Augenstein V.A., Heniford B.T. Prevention and treatment strategies for mesh infection in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018; 142(3S): 149S-55S. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004871
  18. Dipp Ramos R., O’Brien W.J., Gupta K., Itani K.M.F. Re-infection after explantation of infected hernia mesh: are the same micro-organisms involved? Surg. Infect. (Larchmt). 2021; 22(10): 1077-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/sur.2021.142
  19. Birolini C., Tanaka E.Y., de Miranda J.S., Murakami A.H., Damous S.H.B., Utiyama E.M. The early outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction with polyvinylidene (PVDF) mesh in the setting of active infection: a prospective series. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2022; 407(7): 3089-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02625-2
  20. Birolini C., de Miranda J.S., Tanaka E.Y., Utiyama E.M., Rasslan S., Birolini D. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma-A long-term prospective clinical trial. Hernia. 2020; 24(2): 307-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02035-2
  21. Birolini C., de Miranda J.S., Utiyama E.M., Rasslan S. A retrospective review and observations over a 16-year clinical experience on the surgical treatment of chronic mesh infection. What about replacing a synthetic mesh on the infected surgical field? Hernia. 2015; 19(2): 239-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1225-9
  22. Christensen G.D., Simpson W.A., Younger J.J., Baddour L.M., Barrett F.F., Melton D.M. et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1985; 22(6): 996-1006. https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985
  23. Slade E.A., Thorn R.M.S., Young A.E., Reynolds D.M. Real-time detection of volatile metabolites enabling species-level discrimination of bacterial biofilms associated with wound infection. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022; 132(3): 1558-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15313
  24. Ganj F.A., Ibeanu O.A., Bedestani A., Nolan T.E., Chesson R.R. Complications of transvaginal monofilament polypropylene mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic. Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20(8): 919-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0879-9
  25. Negut I., Albu C., Bita B. Advances in antimicrobial coatings for preventing infections of head-related implantable medical devices. Coatings. 2024; 14(3): 256. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/coatings14030256
  26. Okui N., Okui M.A. Pathological insights on polypropylene mesh complications from laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a case series. Cureus. 2024; 16(3): e56354. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56354
  27. Franco-Duarte R., Černáková L., Kadam S., Kaushik K.S., Salehi B., Bevilacqua A. et al. Advances in chemical and biological methods to identify microorganisms-from past to present. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(5): 130. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7050130
  28. Verhorstert K.W.J., Guler Z., de Boer L., Riool M., Roovers J.W.R., Zaat S.A.J. In vitro bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and nonabsorbable polypropylene pelvic floor implants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020; 12(48): 53646-53. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c14668

Received 11.01.2026

Accepted 23.04.2026

About the Authors

Kira V. Shalepo, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, +7(911)247-41-51, 2474151@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-3002-3874
Tatiana A. Khusnutdinova, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, husnutdinovat@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-2655
Olga V. Budilovskaya, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, o.budilovskaya@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7673-6274
Anna A. Krysanova, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, krusanova.anna@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-1881
Elena I. Rusina, Dr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Experimental Microbiology Group, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, pismo_rusina@mail.ru, eLibrary SPIN: 3527-5104, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8744-678X
Anna A. Tsypurdeeva, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of Gynecology and Endocrinology and Head of Gynecology Department I with an operating unit,
D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, tsypurdeeva@mail.ru,
eLibrary SPIN: 5208-9707, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-2094
Maria I. Yarmolinskaya, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Gynecology and Endocrinology, Head of the Center of Diagnostics and Treatment of Endometriosis, D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, m.yarmolinskaya@gmail.com, eLibrary SPIN: 3686-3605, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-4147
Alevtina M. Savicheva, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, D.O. Ott Research Institute
of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, 3 Mendeleyevskaya Line, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia, savitcheva@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-3870-5930
Corresponding author: Kira V. Shalepo, 2474151@mail.ru

Similar Articles