Asherman’s syndrome in patients of reproductive age
Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S., Nikolaeva E.I., Efremova N.V., Bakharovskaya A.S.
Asherman’s syndrome (AS) is an acquired endometrial condition defined by the presence of nonvascular myofibrous intrauterine adhesions and at least one of the following symptoms: history of decreased fertility, recurrent miscarriages, dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, aberrant placentation, or menstrual disorders (amenorrhea, hypomenorrhea, or oligomenorrhea). The review presents a comprehensive analysis and summary of studies on AS, considering the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, advantages and disadvantages of the treatment methods, as well as the latest therapeutic possibilities for intrauterine adhesions. The existing medical literature on the subject accessible via open sources was studied. These sources included the eLibrary (a scientometric database), PubMed (an English-language text database of medical and biological publications), and CyberLeninka (a scientific electronic library). It is essential to consider the findings of the anamnesis, clinical and instrumental studies when selecting an appropriate treatment and prevention of AS. Treatment methods should certainly be aimed at correcting the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development of intrauterine adhesions. Hysteroscopy, hormone therapy and the use of intrauterine contraceptives are the traditional methods. Modern techniques such as the use of biomaterials and stem cells are important components of regenerative medicine. The description of treatment, recurrence prevention, and the incidence of AS is a challenging and clinically significant task.
Conclusion: It is worth noting that if uterine surgery is indicated, the risk of developing intrauterine adhesions should be minimized.
Authors’ contributions: Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S. – developing the concept and design of the study; Nikolaeva E.I., Efremova N.V., Bakharovskaya A.S. – collecting and processing the material, writing the text; Sulima A.N. – editing the text.
Conflicts of interest: Authors declare lack of the possible conflicts of interest.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship. None of the authors has any financial interest in the materials or methods presented.
For citation: Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S., Nikolaeva E.I., Efremova N.V.,
Bakharovskaya A.S. Asherman’s syndrome in patients of reproductive age.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; (10): 19-26 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.150
Keywords
References
- Khan Z. Etiology, risk factors, and management of Asherman syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023; 142(3): 543-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005309.
- Zupi E., Centini G., Lazzeri L. Asherman syndrome: an unsolved clinical definition and management. Fertil. Steril. 2015; 104(6): 1380-1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.036.
- Sharma J.B., Roy K.K., Pushparaj M., Gupta N., Jain S.K., Malhotra N. et al. Genital tuberculosis: an important cause of Asherman's syndrome in India. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008; 277(1): 37-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0419-0.
- Sevinç F., Oskovi-Kaplan Z.A., Çelen Ş., Ozturk Atan D., Topçu H.O. Identifying the risk factors and incidence of Asherman syndrome in women with post-abortion uterine curettage. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2021; 47(4): 1549-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.14667.
- Попов А.А., Мананникова Т.Н., Алиева А.С., Федоров А.А., Беспалова А.Г. Внутриматочные синехии: век спустя. РМЖ. 2017; 12: 895-9. [Popov A.A., Manannikova T.N., Alieva A.S., Fedorov A.A., Bespalova A.G. Intrauterine synechiae: a century later. RMJ. 2017; 12: 895-9 (in Russian)].
- Fritsch H. Ein Fall von volligem Schwaund der Gebormutterhohle nach Auskratzung. Zentralbl. Gynaekol. 1894; 18: 1337-42.
- Asherman J.G. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 1950; 57(6): 892-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06053.x.
- Dreisler E., Kjer J.J. Asherman's syndrome: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. Int. J. Womens Health. 2019; 20(11): 191-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S165474.
- Salazar C.A., Isaacson K., Morris S. A comprehensive review of Asherman's syndrome: causes, symptoms and treatment options. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 29(4): 249-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000378.
- Оразов М.Р., Михалева Л.М., Исмаилзаде С.Я. Факторы риска реализаций внутриматочных адгезий у женщин репродуктивного возраста. Медицинский вестник Юга России. 2022; 13(2): 86-90. [Orazov M.R., Mikhaleva L.M., Ismailzade S.Ya. Risk factors for intrauterine adhesions in women of reproductive age. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2022; 13(2): 86-90. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-2-86-90.
- Manchanda R., Rathore A., Carugno J., Della Corte L., Tesarik J., Török P. et al. Classification systems of Asherman's syndrome. An old problem with new directions. Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 2021; 30(5): 304-10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2021.1893190.
- Jensen P.A., Stromme W.B. Amenorrhea secondary to puerperal curettage (Asherman's syndrome). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1972; 113(2): 150-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(72)90764-8.
- Hooker A.B., Lemmers M., Thurkow A.L., Heymans M.W., Opmeer B.C., Brölmann H.A. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014; 20(2): 262-78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt045.
- Ma X.L., Ding Y., Wu L.M., Wang Y.X., Yao Y., Wang Y.X. et al. The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog exenatide ameliorates intrauterine adhesions in mice. Peptides. 202; 137: 170481. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170481.
- March C.M., Israel R., March A.D. Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine adhesions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1978; 130(6): 653-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(78)90322-8.
- Hamou J., Salat-Baroux J., Siegler A.M. Diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine adhesions by microhysteroscopy. Fertil. Steril. 1983; 39(3): 321-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46879-2.
- Valle R.F., Sciarra J.J. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and repro-ductive outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 158(6 Pt 1): 1459-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90382-1.
- The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil. Steril. 1988; 49(6): 944-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7.
- Wamsteker K., De Blok S.J. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation. In: Sutton C., Diamon M., eds. Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists. New York (NY): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; 1995: 263-76.
- Nasr A.L., Al-Inany H.G., Thabet S.M., Aboulghar M. A clinicohysteroscopic scoring system of intrauterine adhesions. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2000; 50(3): 178-81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000010305.
- Chithra S., Manchanda R., Jain N. Role of hysteroscopy in diagnosis of Asherman’s syndrome: a retrospective study. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2016; 8: 31963-70.
- Soares S.R., Barbosa dos Reis M.M., Camargos A.F. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 73(2): 406-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00532-4.
- Preutthipan S., Linasmita V. A prospective comparative study between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine pathology in patients with infertility. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2003; 29(1): 33-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00068.x.
- Roma Dalfó A., Ubeda B., Ubeda A., Monzón M., Rotger R., Ramos R. et al. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: A comparison with hysteroscopy. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004; 183(5): 1405-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831405.
- Magos A. Hysteroscopic treatment of Asherman's syndrome. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2002; 4 Suppl 3: 46-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(12)60116-3.
- Zhang Y., Zhu X., Zhang T., Zhang Y., Zhang M., Lin X. Analysis of risk factors for obstetric outcomes after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2022; 156(1): 89-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13616.
- Щукина Н.А., Щербатых М.Г., Бабунашвили Е.Л., Беспалова А.Г., Дробин О.Ю., Земскова Н.Ю., Глебов Т.А., Кочеткова А.А. Внутриматочные синехии после миомэктомии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 6: 134-40. [Shchukina N.A., Shcherbatykh M.G., Babunashvili E.L., Bespalova A.G., Drobin O.Yu., Zemskova N.Yu., Glebov T.A., Kochetkova A.A. Intrauterine synechiae after myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (6): 134-40. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.124.
- Bacelar A.C., Wilcock D., Powell M., Worthington B.S. The value of MRI in the assessment of traumatic intra-uterine adhesions (Asherman's syndrome). Clin. Radiol. 1995; 50(2): 80-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(05)82984-8.
- March C.M. Management of Asherman's syndrome. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2011; 23(1): 63-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.018.
- Ding H., Zhang H., Qiao R., Sun N., Ji Y., Pang W. et al. Comparing the efficacy and pregnancy outcome of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1): 49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01222-w.
- Salma U., Xue M., Md Sayed A.S., Xu D. Efficacy of intrauterine device in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014; 2014: 589296. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/589296.
- Siferih M., Gebre T., Hunduma F., Abebe A., Gebremichael A., Sewunet H. et al. Review of Asherman syndrome and its hysteroscopic treatment outcomes: experience in a low-resource setting. BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1): 99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-02944-0.
- Gao W., Wu G., Xu W., Zhao D., Zheng L. Stem cell-based therapy for Asherman's syndrome: promises and challenges. Cell. Transplant. 2021; 30: 9636897211020734. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09636897211020734.
- Singh N., Shekhar B., Mohanty S., Kumar S., Seth T., Girish B. Autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy for Asherman's syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a 5-year follow-up study. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2020; 13(1): 31-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_64_19.
- Jones B.P., Vali S., Saso S., Garcia-Dominguez X., Chan M., Thum M.Y. et al. Endometrial autotransplantation in rabbits: Potential for fertility restoration in severe Asherman's syndrome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 248: 14-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.011.
- Benor A., Gay S., Decherny A. Update on stem cell therapy for Asherman's syndrome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020; 37(7): 1511-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01801-x.
- Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C, Selam B, Ceyhan T, Ornek T. et al. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 90(5): 1973-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.074.
- Thomson A.J., Abbott J.A., Deans R., Kingston A., Vancaillie T.G. The management of intrauterine synechiae. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 21(4): 335-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32832e07fc.
- Vesce F., Jorizzo G., Bianciotto A., Gotti G. Use of the copper intrauterine device in the management of secondary amenorrhea. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 73(1): 162-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00475-6.
- Deans R., Abbott J. Review of intrauterine adhesions. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(5): 555-69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.016.
- Abel M.K., Wald K., Cedars M.I., Noel M. Uterine synechiae after intrauterine device use: a case series. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021; 38(10): 2625-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02173-6.
- Ding H., Zhang H., Qiao R., Sun N., Ji Y., Pang W. et al. Comparing the efficacy and pregnancy outcome of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in infertile women: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1): 49. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01222-w.
- Lin X., Wei M., Li T.C., Huang Q., Huang D., Zhou F. et al. A comparison of intrauterine balloon, intrauterine contraceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syndrome: a cohort study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 170(2): 512-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.018.
- AAGL Elevating Gynecologic Surgery. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines on intrauterine adhesions developed in collaboration with the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). Gynecol. Surg. 2017; 14(1): 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1007-3.
- Ahmad G., Cheong Y.C., Metwally M.E., Watson A.J.S. The use of adhesion prevention agents in obstetrics and gynaecology (Scientific Impact Paper, 39). 2013; London, GB, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 6pp.
- Доброхотова Ю.Э., Гришин И.И., Гришин А.И., Комагоров В.И. Применение противоспаечных гелей при внутриматочной хирургии. РМЖ. Мать и дитя. 2018; 1(1): 71-5. [Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Grishin I.I., Grishin A.I., Komagorov V.I. The use of anti-adhesion gels during intrauterine surgery. RMJ. Mother and Child. 2018; 1(1): 71-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.32364/2618-8430-2018-1-1-71-75.
- Li X., Wu L., Zhou Y., Fan X., Huang J., Wu J. et al. New crosslinked hyaluronan gel for the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after dilation and curettage in patients with delayed miscarriage: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26(1): 94-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.032.
- Fei Z., Xin X., Fei H., Yuechong C. Meta-analysis of the use of hyaluronic acid gel to prevent intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 244: 1-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.018.
- Сулима А.Н., Румянцева З.С., Беглицэ Д.А., Коваленко Е.П., Фомочкина И.И., Ефремова Н.В. Оценка эффективности современного противоспаечного барьера в программе хирургического лечения пациенток с бесплодием трубного происхождения. Женское здоровье и репродукция. 2023; 1(56): 21-6. [Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S., Beglitse D.A., Kovalenko E.P., Fomochkina I.I., Efremova N.V. Efficiency evaluation of the modern anti-adhesive barrier in the surgical treatment program of patients with tubal infertility. Women's Health and Reproduction. 2023; 1(56): 21-6. (in Russian)].
- Сулима А.Н., Румянцева З.С., Беглицэ Д.А., Коваленко Е.П., Фомочкина И.И., Сизова О.А. Анализ эффективности применения противоспаечного геля Реформ после эндохирургических органосохраняющих операций при трубной беременности. Таврический медико-биологический вестник. 2022; 25(4): 43-7. [Sulima A.N., Rumyantseva Z.S., Beglitse D.A., Kovalenko E.P., Fomochkina I.I., Sizova O.A. Analysis of the effectiveness of the use of anti-adhesion gel Reform after endosurgical organ-preserving operations during tubal pregnancy. Tauride Medical and Biological Bulletin. 2022; 25(4): 43-7. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.29039/2070-8092-2022-25-4-43-47.
Received 30.06.2024
Accepted 04.10.2024
About the Authors
Anna N. Sulima, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology № 1, Order of the Labor Red Banner Medical Institute named after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Russia, Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Lenin blvd., 5/7, +7(978)764-82-00,gsulima@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-6985
Zoya S. Rumyantseva, PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology № 1, Order of the Labor Red Banner Medical Institute named after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Russia, Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Lenin blvd., 5/7, +7(978)855-85-37,
zoyarum@inbox.ru, https://orcid.org/0001-0002-1711-021X
Yelizaveta I. Nikolaeva, Resident Physician at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology № 1, Order of the Labor Red Banner Medical Institute named
after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Russia, Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Lenin blvd., 5/7, +7(978)860-51-88,
yelizavetakaraseva19@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-1062
Natalia V. Efremova, Resident Physician at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology № 1, Order of the Labor Red Banner Medical Institute named
after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Russia, Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Lenin blvd., 5/7, +7(988)252-03-12,
natasha_horunzhaya@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-9358
Anastasiya S. Bakharovskaya, Student at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology № 1, Order of the Labor Red Banner Medical Institute
named after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Russia, Republic of Crimea, Simferopol, Lenin blvd., 5/7, +7(978)755-00-78,
nastyabakharovskaya@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1489-0289
Corresponding author: Anna N. Sulima, gsulima@yandex.ru