Ultrasound during labor: techniques and practical application

1. Dupuis O., Silveira R., Zentner A., Dittmar A., Gaucherand P., Cucherat M. et al. Birth simulator: Reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192(3): 868-74.
2. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Хасанов А.А. Ультразвуковое исследование в родах. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2014; 3: 81-2. [Miftakhutdinova D. K., Teregulova L. E., Khasanov A. A. Ultrasound examination in childbirth. Ultrasound and functional diagnostics. 2014; 3: 81-2. (in Russian)]
3. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Галимова И.Р. Протокол ультразвукового исследования в родах. Практическая медицина. 2015; 4-1: 143-6. [Miftakhutdinova D. K., Teregulova L. E., Galimova I. R. Protocol of ultrasound examination in childbirth. Practical medicine. 2015; 4-1: 143-6.(in Russian)]
4. Barbera A.F., Pombar X., Peruginoj G., Lezotte D.C., Hobbins J.C. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 313-9.
5. Barbera A.F., Imani F., Becker T., Lezotte D.C., Hobbins J.C. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 320-5.
6. Kalache K.D., Dückelmann A.M., Michaelis S.A.M., Lange J., Cichon G., Dudenhausen J.W. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 326-30.
7. Калачев В.Н., Захаренкова Т.Н. Интрапартальная ультразвуковая диагностика при выборе тактики ведения затянувшегося второго периода родов. Репродуктивное здоровье. Восточная Европа. 2017; 7(3): 342-50. [Kalachev V. N., Zakharenkova T. N. Intrapartum ultrasound in choosing management strategy for prolonged second stage of labor. Reproductive health. Eastern Europe. 2017; 7(3): 342-50. (in Russian)]
8. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Галимова И.Р., Губайдуллина С.В. Значение угла прогрессии для оценки продвижения головки плода во втором периоде родов при трансперинеальном ультразвуковом исследовании. Практическая медицина. 2013; 2: 108-11. [Miftakhutdinova DK, Teregulova L.E., Galimova I.R., Gubaidullina S.V. The value of the angle of progression for assessing the fetal head progression in the second stage of labor using transperineal ultrasound Practical medicine. 2013; 2: 108-11. (in Russian)]
9. Dietz H.P., Lanzarone V., Simpson J.M. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 27(4): 409-15.
10. Gilboa Y., Kivilevitch Z., Spira M., Kedem A., Katorza E., Moran O. et al. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(4): 436-41.
11. Henrich W., Dudenhausen J., Fuchs I., Kämena A., Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 28(6): 753-60.
12. Tutschek B., Braun T., Chantraine F., Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011; 118(1): 62-9.
13. Ghi T., Farina A., Pedrazzi A., Rizzo N., Pelusi G., Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 331-6.
14. Tutschek B., Torkildsen E.A., Eggebø T.M. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(4): 425-9.
15. Eggebø T.M., Gjessing L.K., Heien C., Smedvig E., Økland I., Romundstad P. et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 27(4): 387-91.
16. Kasbaoui S., Séverac F., Aïssi G., Gaudineau A., Lecointre L., Akladios C. et al. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 216(5): 507.e1-507. e9.
17. Ghi T., Maroni E., Youssef A., Morselli-Labate A.M., Paccapelo A., Montaguti E. et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: Relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 44(1): 82-9.
18. Youssef A., Maroni E., Ragusa A., De Musso F., Salsi G., Iammarino M.T. et al. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(4): 419-24.
19. Ghi T., Youssef A., Maroni E., Pilu G., Rizzo N. Head rotation in labor and intrapartum sonography diagnosis with 2D and 3D. In: Malvasi A., ed.
20. Intrapartum ultrasonography for labor management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012: 101-8.
21. Gilboa Y., Kivilevitch Z., Spira M., Kedem A., Katorza E., Moran O. et al. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(4): 442-6.

Reseived 04.12.2018

Accepted 22.02.2019