Increased thrombin generation as a potential marker of adverse pregnancy outcomes

1. Бицадзе В.О., Макацария А.Д., Хизроева Д.Х., Макацария Н.А., Яшенина Е.В., Казакова Л.А. Тромбофилия как важнейшее звено патогенеза осложнений беременности. Практическая медицина. 2012; 9: 24-31. [Bitsadze V.O., Makatsaria A.D., Khizroeva D.Kh., Makatsaria N.A., Yashenina E.V., Kazakova L.A. Thrombophilia as the most important link in the pathogenesis of complications of pregnancy. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2012; 9: 24-31. (in Russian)]

2. Mastrolia S.A., Mazor M., Loverro G., Klaitman V., Erez O. Placental vascular pathology and increased thrombin generation as mechanisms of disease in obstetrical syndromes. PeerJ. 2014; 2: e653.

3. Simcox L.E., Ormesher L., Tower C., Greer I.A. Thrombophilia and pregnancy complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015; 16(12): 28418-28.

4. Bates S.M. Preventing thrombophilia-related complications of pregnancy: an update. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2013; 6(3): 287-300.

5. Липец Е.Н., Атауллаханов Ф.И., Пантелеев М.А. Интегральные лабораторные тесты гемостаза в диагностике гиперкоагуляции и оценке риска тромбоза. Онкогематология. 2015; 10(3): 73-91. [Lipets E.N., Ataullakhanov F.I., Panteleev M.A. Integral laboratory tests of hemostasis in the diagnosis of hypercoagulation and evaluation of the risk of thrombosis. Onkogematologiya. 2015; 10(3): 73-91. (in Russian)]

6. Othman M., Falcón B.J., Kadir R. Global hemostasis in pregnancy: are we using thromboelastography to its full potential? Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2010; 36(7): 738-46.

7. Момот А.П., Молчанова И.В., Семенова Н.А., Романов В.В., Сердюк Г.В., Белозеров Д.Е., Трухина Д.А., Кудинова И.Ю., Максимова Н.В. Динамика показателей системы гемостаза у женщин при вынашивании беременности и после родов. Лабораторная служба. 2015; 4(2): 3-11. [Momot A.P., Molchanova I.V., Semenova N.A., Romanov V.V., Serdyuk G.V., Belozerov D.E., Trukhina D.A., Kudinova I.Yu., Maksimova N.V. Dynamics of indicators of the system of hemostasis in women during pregnancy and after childbirth. Laboratornaya sluzhba. 2015; 4(2): 3-11. (in Russian)]

8. Patel J.P., Patel R.K., Roberts L.N., Marsh M.S., Green B., Davies J.G., Arya R. Changes in thrombin generation and D-dimer concentrations in women injecting enoxaparin during pregnancy and the puerperium. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 384.

9. Николаева А.Е., Кутуева Ф.Р., Кайка И.А., Папаян Л.П., Капустин С.И., Наместников Ю.А., Силина Н.Н. Клиническое значение ретрохориальной гематомы у беременных, имеющих факторы риска по возникновению репродуктивных потерь. Опыт ведения в условиях женской консультации. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011; 5: 94-8. [Nikolayeva A.E., Kutuyeva F.R., Kaika I.A., Papayan L.P., Kapustin S.I., Namestnikov Yu.A., Silina N.N. Clinical value of retrochorial hematoma in pregnant women having risk factors for reproductive losses: management experience in an antenatal clinic. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011; 5: 94-8. (in Russian)]

10. Hemker H.C., Giesen P., AlDieri R., Regnault V., de Smed E, Wagenvoord R. et al. The calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT): a universal routine test for hyper- and hypocoagulability. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2002; 32(5-6): 249-53.

11. Gribkova I.V., Lipets E.N., Rekhtina I.G., Bernakevich A.I., Ayusheev D.B., Ovsepyan R.A. et al. The modification of the thrombin generation test for the clinical assessment of dabigatran etexilate efficiency. Sci. Rep. 2016;6: 29242.

12. McLean K.C., Bernstein I.M., Brummel-Ziedins K.E. Tissue factor-dependent thrombin generation across pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 207(2): 135. e1-6.

13. Erez O., Romero R., Vaisbuch E., Kusanovic J.P., Mazaki-Tovi S., Chaiworapongsa T. et al. The pattern and magnitude of “in vivo thrombin generation” differ in women with preeclampsia and in those with SGA fetuses without preeclampsia. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31(13): 1671-80.

14. Rosenkranz A., Hiden M., Leschnik B., Weiss E.C., Schlembach D., Lang U. et al. Calibrated automated thrombin generation in normal uncomplicated pregnancy. Thromb. Haemost. 2008; 99(2): 331-7.

15. Kovac M.K., Lalic-Cosic S.Z., Dmitrovic J.M., Djordjevic V.J., Radojkovic D.P. Thrombin generation, D-dimer and protein S in uncomplicated pregnancy. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2015; 53(12): 1975-9.

16. Joly B., Barbay V., Borg J.Y., Le Cam-Duchez V. Comparison of markers of coagulation activation and thrombin generation test in uncomplicated pregnancies. Thromb. Res. 2013; 132(3): 386-91.

17. Bagot C.N., Leishman E., Onyiaodike C.C., Jordan F., Freeman D.J. Normal pregnancy is associated with an increase in thrombin generation from the very early stages of the first trimester. Thromb. Res. 2017; 157: 49-54.

18. Efthymiou M., Lawrie A.S., Mackie I., Arachchillage D., Lane P.J., Machin S. et al. Thrombin generation and factor X assays for the assessment of warfarin anticoagulation in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb. Res. 2015; 135(6): 1191-7.

19. Vidaeff A.C., Mongan M., Ramin S.M., Saade G., Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Is thrombin activation predictive of subsequent preterm delivery? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 208: 306. e1-7.

20. Chowdary P., Adamidou D., Riddell A., Aghighi S., Griffioen A., Priest P. et al. Thrombin generation assay identifies individual variability in responses to low molecular weight heparin in pregnancy: implications for anticoagulant monitoring. Br. J. Haematol. 2015; 168(5): 719-27.

21. Bennett S.A., Bagot C.N., Appiah A., Johns J., Ross J., Roberts L.N. et al. Women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss do not have evidence of an underlying prothrombotic state: experience with calibrated automated thrombography and rotational thromboelastometry. Thromb. Res. 2014; 133(5): 892-9.

Received 16.11.2017

Accepted 22.12.2017