Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with birth weight discordance
Birth weight discordance in multiple pregnancies is not uncommon, and significant birth weight difference is a risk factor for adverse outcomes. Aim. To investigate perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with significant (over 25%) birth weight discordance. Material and methods. The study comprised 485 pregnant women and their 959 newborns. Two groups were formed based on the presence or absence of birth weight discordance, in which the antenatal and neonatal periods were analyzed. Results. Birth weight discordance was detected in 18.8% of twins. The antenatal mortality rate in groups with and without birth weight discordance was 6.6% and 1.3%, respectively, p = 0.008. The median gestational age of twins with and without birth weight discordance was 33.6 and 36.0 weeks, respectively, p <0.001. Twins with birth weight discordance had significantly lower birth weight (1654 g) than concordant twins (2386 g), p <0.001. The neonatal mortality rate of twins with birth weight discordance was 9.1% compared with 1% in concordant twins, p <0.001. Discordant twins had higher neonatal morbidity (21.6%) than concordant twins (6.1%), (p = 0.002). Conclusion. Twin birth weight discordance is a risk factor for antenatal death, premature birth, and surgical delivery. At the same time, birth weight discordance is associated with high neonatal morbidity (respiratory and neurological disorders) and mortality.Kostyukov K.V., Ionov O.V., Shakaya M.N.
Keywords
multiple gestation pregnancy
fetal growth restriction of one twin
birth weight discordance
References
- Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Osterman M.J. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009. NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Jan; (80): 1-8.
- Blickstein I. Normal and abnormal growth of multiples. Semin. Neonatol. 2002; 7(3): 177-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/siny.2002.0105.
- Hack K.E., Derks J.B., Elias S.G., Franx A., Roos E.J., Voerman S.K. et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG. 2008; 115(1): 58-67. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x.
- Visintin C., Mugglestone M.A., James D., Kilby M.D.; Guideline Development Group. Antenatal care for twin and triplet pregnancies: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5714. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5714.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 121(5): 1122-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9.
- Lewi L., Devlieger R., De Catte L., Deprest J. Growth discordance. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014; 28(2): 295-303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.12.003.
- Amaru R.C., Bush M.C., Berkowitz R.L., Lapinski R.H., Gaddipati S. Is discordant growth in twins an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome? Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 103(1): 71-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000104060.37475.29.
- Hartley R.S., Hitti J., Emanuel I. Size-discordant twin pairs have higher perinatal mortality rates than non discordant pairs. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 187(5): 1173-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.126961.
- D’Antonio F., Odibo A.O., Prefumo F., Khalil A., Buca D., Flacco M.E. et al. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 52(1): 11-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.18966.
- Miller J., Chauhan S.P., Abuhamad A.Z. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 206(1): 10-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.075.
- Machado M., Lima T.E., Ferreira L.M., Rodrigues F., Henriques R., Afonso E. Perinatal outcome in relation to chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Acta Med. Port. 2017; 30(1): 12-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.20344/amp.7133.
- D’Antonio F., Khalil A., Dias T., Thilaganathan B. Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(6): 632-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.12363.
- Carter E.B., Bishop K.C., Goetzinger K.R., Tuuli M.G., Cahill A.G. The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 213(3): 390. e1-7.
- Al Riyami N., Al-Rusheidi A., Al-Khabori M. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic in comparison to dichorionictwin pregnancies. Oman Med. J. 2013; 28(3): 173-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2013.49.
- Fumagalli M., Schiavolin P., Bassi L., Groppo M., Uccella S., De Carli A. et al. The impact of twin birth on early neonatal outcomes. Am. J. Perinatol. 2016; 33(1): 63-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556881.
- Lee H.J., Kim S.H., Chang K.H., Sung J.H., Choi S.J., Oh S.Y. et al. Gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: what is the optimal gestational age for delivery according to chorionicity? Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 2016; 59(1): 9-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.1.9.
- McLennan A.S., Gyamfi-Bannerman C., Ananth C.V., Wright J.D., Siddiq Z., D’Alton M.E. et al. The role of maternal age in twin pregnancy outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 217(1): 80. e8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.002.
- Garabedian C., Poulain C., Duhamel A., Subtil D., Houfflin-Debarge V., Deruelle P. Intrapartum management of twin pregnancies: are uncomplicated monochorionic pregnancies more at risk of complications than dichorionic pregnancies? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015; 94(3): 301-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12558.
- Callaghan W.M., MacDorman M.F., Rasmussen S.A., Qin C., Lackritz E.M. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4): 1566‐73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0860.
- Masheer S., Islam Z., Dileep D., Munim S. Twin chorionicity and prospective stillbirth risk: experience at a tertiary care hospital. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2017; 67(3): 360-4.
- Di Mascio D., Acharya G., Khalil A., Odibo A., Prefumo F., Liberati M. et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019; 98(10): 1245‐57. https://dx.doi. org/10.1111/aogs.13613.
- Timur H., Aksoy R.T., Tokmak A., Timur B., Coskun B., Uygur D., Danisman N. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies diagnosed with vanishing twin syndrome: a retrospective analysis from a single clinical center. Ginekol. Pol. 2018; 89(1): 30-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2018.0006.
Received 28.11.2019
Accepted 29.11.2019
About the Authors
Kirill V. Kostyukov, Ph.D., Senior Researcher at the Department of Fetal Medicine, Institute of Obstetrics; Physician at the Department of Functional and Ultrasound Diagnostics, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P of Minzdrav of Russia. Tel.: +7(926)214-97-84. E-mail: kostyukov_k@yahoo.com.4 Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Oleg V. Ionov, Ph.D., Head of the A.G. Antonov Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Neonatology and Pediatrics, V.I. Kulakov NMRC for OG&P of Minzdrav of Russia; Associate Professor at the Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Pediatrics of I.M. Sechenov First MSMU. E-mail: o_ionov@oparina4.ru.
4 Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
Marika N Shakaya, Ph.D., Teaching Assistant at the Department of Neonatology, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of Minzdrav
of Russia (Sechenov University); Emergency Neonatologist at the A.G. Antonov Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Neonatology and Pediatrics, V.I. Kulakov
NMRC for OG&P of Minzdrav of Russia; Tel.: +7(903)769-61-60. E-mail: m_shakaya@oparina4.ru. 4 Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.
For citation: Kostyukov K.V., Ionov O.V., Shakaya M.N.
Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies with birth weight discordance.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 5: 78-84 (In Russian).
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.5.78-84