ISSN 0300-9092 (Print)
ISSN 2412-5679 (Online)

A new perspective on uterine embryogenesis

Makiyan Z.N.

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Background: The embryonic development of the uterus and vagina has been studied through a systematic review of scientific literature, from the earliest published papers to the most recent studies. According to the theory proposed by Muller in 1830, the fallopian tubes, uterus, and vagina develop from fused paramesonephric ducts, while the mesonephric ducts are reduced in the female fetus.
Results: A comparative analysis of clinical variations of uterine abnormalities was conducted based on the results of the observations between 1996 and 2025. Some complex issues have been identified, namely, how to draw a distinction line between the uterus, which has a thick layer of myometrium and endometrial cavity, and the fallopian tubes and vagina during the fusion of symmetrical genital ducts. The origin of the normal endometrium is still unknown. The results of the review demonstrated the chronological stages of embryonic morphogenesis; relevant references to primary sources were provided.
Conclusion: A new theory of uterine embryogenesis has been formulated: the fallopian tubes and vagina develop from the mesonephric ducts, and the uterus is formed by the fusion of the mesonephric ducts with the gonadal ridges. The proposed new theory may be the key to understanding abnormalities in the development of the uterus, as well as major gynecological diseases such as myoma and endometriosis from embryonic polypotent cells.

Conflicts of interest: The author declares lack of the possible conflicts of interest.
Funding: The study was conducted without sponsorship.
For citation: Makiyan Z.N. A new perspective on uterine embryogenesis.
Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2025; (10): 166-172 (in Russian)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2025.276

Keywords

paramesonephric
mesonephric ducts
uterine abnormalities
organogenesis
myoma
endometriosis

References

  1. Müller J.P. Bildungsgeschichte der Genitalien aus anatomischen Untersuchungen an Embryonen des Menschen und der Thiere. Düsseldorf: Arnz; 1830: 185-7.
  2. Muller J.P. Anatomie des Menschen. Berlin: Miller; 1931: 272-5.
  3. Sulik K.K., Bream P.R. Jr. Embryo images: Normal and abnormal mammalian development. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.med.unc.edu/embryo_images/
  4. Sadler T.W. Langman's medical embryology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000; 324. Fig. 14.3-C.
  5. Hill M.A. Embryology BGD Lecture - Sexual Differentiation. 2025. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/BGD_Lecture_-_Sexual_Differentiation
  6. Hill M.A. Embryology Primordial Germ Cell Migration Movie. 2025. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Primordial_Germ_Cell_Migration_Movie
  7. Hill M.A. Embryology Stage 13 image 093.jpg. 2025. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/File:Stage_13_image_093.jpg
  8. Hill M.A. Embryology Stage 22 image 214.jpg. 2025. Retrieved from https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/File:Stage_22_image_214.jpg
  9. Hurst C.H., Abbott B., Schmid J.E., Birnbaum L.S. Feulgen staining of female rat reproductive tracts after GD 15 administration of 1.0 μg TCDD/kg showing width of interductal mesenchyme. Toxicol. Sci. 2002; 65(1): 87-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/65.1.87
  10. Hashimoto R. Development of the human Müllerian duct in the sexually undifferentiated stage. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 2003; 272(2): 514-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10061
  11. Макиян З.Н. Аномалии мочеполовой системы – этапы эмбриогенеза. В кн.: Эндоскопия и альтернативные подходы в хирургическом лечении женских болезней. Сборник статей. М.: Российская акад. мед. наук; 2001: 329-41. [Makiyan Z.N. Abnormalities of the urinary and genital systems: stages of embryogenesis. In: Endoscopy and alternative approaches in the surgical treatment of female diseases. Collection of articles. Moscow: Russian Academy of Medical Sciences; 2001: 329-41 (in Russian)].
  12. Makiyan Z. Studies of gonadal sex differentiation. Organogenesis. 2016; 12(1): 42-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2016.1145318
  13. Адамян Л.В., Курило Л.Ф., Глыбина Т.М., Окулов А.Б., Макиян З.Н. Аномалии развития женских половых органов: новый взгляд на морфогенез. Проблемы репродукции. 2009; 15(4): 10-9. [Adamyan L.V., Kurilo L.F., Glybina T.M., Okulov A.B., Makiyan Z.N. Abnormalities of female reproductive organs development: a new perspective on morphogenesis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2009; 15(4): 10-19 (in Russian)].
  14. Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Асатурова А.В., Ярыгина Н.К. Маточные рудименты: клинико-морфологические варианты и оптимизация хирургического лечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 12: 126-32. [Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Asaturova A.V., Yarygina N.K. Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Asaturova A.V., Yarygina N.K. Uterine rudiments: clinical and morphological options of surgical treatment and its optimization. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (12): 126-32 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.12.126-132
  15. Макиян З.Н., Адамян Л.В., Ярыгина Н.К., Асатурова А.В. Гигантская миома маточных рудиментов при аплазии матки и влагалища. Акушерство и гинекология, 2020; 8: 149-52. [Makiyan Z.N., Adamyan L.V., Yarygina N.K., Asaturova A.V. Giant myoma of uterine rudiments in uterovaginal aplasia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (8): 149-52 (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.8.149-152
  16. Makiyan Z. Systematization for female genital anatomic variations. Clin. Anat. 2021; 34(3): 420-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.23668
  17. Makiyan Z. Endometriosis origin from primordial germ cells. Organogenesis. 2017; 13(3): 95-102. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2017.1323162
  18. Burunova V.V., Gisina A.M., Yarygina N.K., Sukhinich K.K., Makiyan Z.N., Yarygin K.N. Isolation of a population of cells co-expressing markers of embryonic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells from the rudimentary uterine horn of a patient with uterine aplasia. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2023; 174(4): 549-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10517-023-05746-w
  19. Makiyan Z. New theory of uterovaginal embryogenesis. Organogenesis. 2016; 12(1): 33-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2016.1145317
  20. Acién P., Navarro V., Acién M. Embryological-clinical classification of female genital tract malformations – a review and update. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2024; 51(1): 104751. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104751
  21. Acién P., Sánchez del Campo F., Mayol M.J., Acién M. The female gubernaculum: role in the embryology and development of the genital tract and in the possible genesis of malformations. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011; 159(2): 426-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.040
  22. Cunha G.R., Kurita T., Cao M., Shen J., Robboy S., Baskin L. Molecular mechanisms of development of the human fetal female reproductive tract. Differentiation. 2017; 97: 54-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2017.07.003
  23. Fatum M., Rojansky N., Shushan A. Septate uterus with cervical duplication: rethinking the development of Mullerian anomalies. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2003; 55(3):186-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000071535
  24. Fritsch H., Hoermann R., Bitsche M., Pechriggl E., Reich O. Development of epithelial and mesenchymal regionalization of the human fetal utero-vaginal anlagen. J. Anat. 2013; 222(4): 462-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12029
  25. Martínez-Frías M.L., Frías J.L., Opitz J.M. Errors of morphogenesis and developmental field theory. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1998; 76(4): 291-6.
  26. Sanchez-Ferrer M.L., Acien M.I., Sanchez Del Campo F., Mayol-Belda M.J., Acién P. Experimental contributions to the study of the embryology of the vagina. Hum. Reprod. 2006; 21(6): 1623-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del031
  27. Shapiro E., Huang H., McFadden D.E., Masch R.J., Ng E., Lepor H., Wu X.R. The prostatic utricle is not a Mullerian duct remnant: immunonistochemical evidence for a distinct urogenital sinus origin. J. Urol. 2004; 172(4 Pt 2): 1753-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000140267.46772.7d
  28. Spencer T.E., Hayashi K., Hu J., Carpenter K.D. Comparative developmental biology of the mammalian uterus. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2005; 68: 85-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(05)68004-0
  29. Cunha G.R. The dual origin of vaginal epithelium. Am. J. Anat. 1975; 143(3): 387-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001430309
  30. Fritsch H., Richter E., Adam N. Molecular characteristics and alterations during early development of the human vagina. J. Anat. 2012; 220(4): 363-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01472.x
  31. Jost A. A new look at the mechanisms controlling sex differentiation in mammals. Johns Hopkins Med. J. 1972; 130(1): 38-53.
  32. Robboy S.J., Kurita T., Baskin L., Cunha G.R. New insights into human female reproductive tract development. Differentiation. 2017; 97: 9-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2017.08.002

Received 30.06.2025

Accepted 10.07.2025

About the Authors

Zograb N. Makiyan, Dr. Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Department of Operative Gynecology, Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 4, Oparin str., Moscow, 117997, Russia, makiyan@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0463-1913

Similar Articles