External cephalic version in cases of pelvic and transverse lie

1. Hartnack T.H.E., Rasmussen S., Krebs L. Consequences of the term breech trial in Denmark. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2011; 90(7): 767-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01143.x.
2. Rietberg C.C., Elferink-Stinkens P.M., Visser G.H. The effect of the term breech trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005; 112(8): 205-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00317.x.
3. Sullivan E.A., Moran K., Chapman M. Term breech singletons and caesarean section: a population study, Australia 1991-2005. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 49(5): 456-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01050.x.
4. Collaris R.J., Oei S.G. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2004; 83(6): 511-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00347.x.
5. Hofmeyr G.J., Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000; (2): CD000083. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083
6. Breech Presentation and Delivery. SOGC obstetrical content review committee. 2012.
7. Адамян Л.В., Артымук Н.В., Баев О.Р., Белокриницкая Т.Е., Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Мельников А.П., Петрухин В.А., Пучко Т.К., Смольнова Т.Ю., Филиппов О.С., Шмаков Р.Г. Тазовое предлежание плода (ведение беременности и родов). Клинические рекомендации (протокол). Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации; 2017. 39 с. [Adamyan L.V., Artymuk N.V., Baev O.R., Belokrinickaya T.E., Krasnopol’skij V.I., Logutova L.S., Mel’nikov A.P., Petrukhin V.A., Puchko T.K., Smol’nova T.YU., Filippov O.S., Shmakov R.G. Tazovoe predlezhanie ploda(vedenie beremennosti i rodov). Klinicheskie rekomendatsii (protocol) Ministerstvo Zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii, 2017, 39 p.(in Russian)]
8. External cephalic version and reducing of breech presentation. Guideline No. 20a. 2010. External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20a. BJOG. 2017; 124(7): e178-e192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14466.
9. Abenhaim H., Varin J., Boucher M. External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature. J. Perinat. Med. 2009; 37(2): 156–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.006.
10. de Meeus J.B., Ellia F., Magnin G. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: A series of 38 cases. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1998; 81: 65–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00149-3.
11. Sela H.Y., Fiegenberg T., Ben Arie A., Elchalal U., Ezra Y. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009; 142(2): 111–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012.
12. Berghella V. Prolapsed cord after external cephalic version in a patient with premature rupture of membranes and transverse lie. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2001; 99(2): 274–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00389-X.
13. Brost B.C., Adams J.D., Hester M. External cephalic version after ruptured membranes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 95(6,Pt2): 1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00588-8.
14. Kok M., Cnossen J., Gravendeel L., van der Post J.A., Mol B.W. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(1): 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6277.
15. Boucher M., Bujold E., Marquette G.P., Vezina Y. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 189(3): 751–4. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00846-9.
16. Haas D.M., Magann E.F. External cephalic version with an amniotic fluid index < or = 10 : a systematic review. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005; 18(4): 249-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050500277586.
17. Grootscholten K., Kok M., Oei S.G., Mol B.W., van der Post J.A. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 112(5): 1143–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade.
18. Hutton E.K., Hofmeyr G.J., Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; (7): CD000084.
19. Васильев В.Е., Васильев В.В., Иванов Д.О., Ветров В.В., Петренко Ю.В. Исходы беременности при наружном профилактическом повороте плода на головку. Детская медицина Северо-Запада. 2012; 3(3): 56–62. [Vasil’ev V.E., Vasil’ev V.V., Ivanov D.O., Vetrov V.V., Petrenko Yu.V. Iskhody beremennosti pri naruzhnom profilakticheskom povorote ploda na golovku. Detskaya medicina Severo-Zapada 3.3 (2012): 56–62. (in Russian)]
20. Lou T.K., Lo K.W., Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 176(1, Pt1): 218–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80040-3.
21. Kabiri D., Elram T., Aboo-Dia M., Elami-Suzin M., Elchalal U., Ezra Y. Timing of delivery after external cephalic version and the risk for cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 118(2,Pt1): 209–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822545a9.

Received 03.06.2019

Accepted 21.06.2109